Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:24:14.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Negative Sorption in Studies of Ion Fixation By Hydrobiotite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Donald G. Jacobs*
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA

Abstract

The exclusion of anions relative to tritiated water from the negatively charged interlamellar spacing of hydrobiotites that have a limited degree of lattice expansion permits measurement of the interlamellar volume. Measurement of the changes in the interlamellar volume and in the exchange capacity, when hydrobiotite lattices are collapsed by potassium treatment or expanded by treatment with sodium tetraphenyl boron, provides a means for estimating the distribution of the surface charge densities of these interstratified minerals.

In the hydrobiotite sample studied (Zonolite from Traveler’s Rest, South Carolina), the biotite fraction was estimated to have a surface charge density of 2.0 ± 0.14 × 10−7 meq cm−2 and the vermiculite fraction, 1.5 ± 0.51 × 10−7 meq cm−2. The charge density, and its relative distribution, was reflected in the tendency of these mineral fractions to collapse upon potassium treatment and to entrap trace concentrations of cesium in the interlayer spacing.

Type
General Session
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Research sponsored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under contract with the Union Carbide Corporation.

References

Barshad, I. (1948) Vermiculite and its relationship to biotite as revealed by base exchange reactions, X-ray analyses, differential thermal curves and water content, Am. Mineralogist 33, 655–78.Google Scholar
Barshad, I. (1949) The nature of lattice expansion and its relation to hydration in montmorillonite and vermiculite, Am. Mineralogist 34, 675–84.Google Scholar
Barshad, I. (1950) The effect of the interlayer cations on the expansion of the mica type of crystal lattice, Am. Mineralogist 35, 225–38.Google Scholar
DeMumbrum, L. E. (1959) Exchangeable potassium levels in vermiculite and K-depleted micas and implications relative to potassium levels in soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 23, 192–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glueckauf, E. (1955) Theory of chromatography. Part 9. The “ Theoretical Plate” concept in column separations, Trans. Faraday Soc. 51, 3444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E. (1953) Clay Mineralogy, McGraw-Hill, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, I., Deshpande, K. V., and Thomas, H. C. (1964) Peclet numbers and retardation factors for ion exchange columns, Ind. and Eng. Chem. Fundamentals 3, 213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfferich, F. (1962) Ion Exchange, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobs, O. G. (1963) The effect of collapse-inducing cations on the cesium sorption properties of hydrobiotite, International Clay Conference, Sweden (Edited by Rosenqvist, Th. and Graff-Peterson, P.), pp. 239–48, Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. G., and Tamura, T. (1960) The mechanism of ion fixation using radioisotope techniques, Trans. 7th Intern. Cong. Soil Sci. 2, 206–14.Google Scholar
Keay, J., and Wild, A. (1962) The kinetics of cation exchange in vermiculite, Soil Sci. 92, 5460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruyt, H. R. (1952) Colloid Science, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam .Google Scholar
Rifai, M. N. E., Kaufman, W. J., and Todd, D. K. (1952) Dispersion Phenomena in Laminar Flow Through Porous Media, California Univ. Div. Civil Eng., Sanitary Eng. Res. Lab., IER ser. 93, no. 2.Google Scholar
Schofield, R. K., and Talibuddin, O. (1948) Measurement of internal surface by negative adsorption, Discussions Faraday Soc. 3, 51–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, C. E. (1958) The effects and geologic significance of potassium “ fixation” by expandable clay minerals derived from muscovite, biotite, chlorite, and volcanic material, Am. Mineralogist 43, 839–61.Google Scholar