Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T12:21:28.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Diffusion: Is It an Important Transport Mechanism in Compacted Clays?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Dennis W. Oscarson
Dennis W. Oscarson*
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba ROE 1L0 Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surface diffusion, or migration within the electrical double layer next to mineral surfaces, is often invoked as a significant contributor to the overall diffusion coefficient in compacted clays, particularly where model predictions underestimate measured diffusion coefficients. The potential for surface diffusion of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Na+ on three clays compacted to dry bulk densities of 1.25 and 1.60 Mg/m3 was examined. The clays were a bentonite, an illite/smectite, and a glacial lake clay (composed mainly of smectite, illite, kaolinite and quartz). The clays were saturated with a Na-Ca-Cl-dominated synthetic groundwater solution with an effective ionic strength of 220 mol/m3. Total intrinsic diffusion coefficients for the cations were determined from their steady-state flux through compacted clays, and apparent diffusion coefficients were obtained from the time-lag technique. Models of diffusive transport in compacted clays, based only on diffusion in the pore solution, adequately described the diffusion data for all clays and diffusants, and there was no need to invoke other transport mechanisms, like surface diffusion. The data indicate that surface diffusion is not a significant transport mechanism in compacted clays at least to a clay density of 1.60 Mg/m3.

Keywords

Compacted claysSurface diffusionTransport mechanism
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , October 1994 , pp. 534 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © 1994, Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, J. J., Pinder, J. E., Wurtz, E., and Lesnek, S.. The effect of pH, solid phase, particle concentration and equilibrium time on the partition coefficients of curium on natural sediments. In Application of Distribution Coefficients to Radiological Assessment Models. Sibley, T. H., and Myttenaere, C., 1986 eds. London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 72–82.Google Scholar
Berry, J. A., and Bond, K. A.. 1992 . Studies of the extent of surface diffusion in the migration of radionuclides through geological materials. Radiochim. Acta 58/59: 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, M. H., Green, A., Lever, D., and Stephen, I. G.. 1986 . Diffusion and permeability based on sorption measurements in sandstone, anhydrite and upper magnesian limestone samples. UKAEA Report AERE-R 11995, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, Oxfordshire, U.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D. L., Mortland, M. M., and Kemper, W. D.. Specific surface. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd Ed. Klute, A., 1986 ed. Madison, Wisconsin: ASA and SSSA, 413–423.Google Scholar
Chandratillake, M., Falck, W. E., and Read, D.. 1992 . CHEMVAL Project: Guide to the CHEMVAL Thermodynamic Database. U.K. DOE Report No. DOE/HMIP/RR/92/094, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Chang, K.-P., Hsu, C.-N., and Tamaki, H.. 1993 . Basic study of 137Cs sorption on soil. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 30: 1243–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, W. J., Oscarson, D. W., Gray, M. N., and Cheung, S. C. H.. 1993a . Influence of diffusant concentration on diffusion coefficients in clay. Radiochim. Acta 60: 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, W. J., Oscarson, D. W., and Hahn, P. S.. 1993b . The measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients in compacted clays: An assessment of methods. Appl. Clay Sci. 8: 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conca, J. L., Apted, M., and Arthur, R.. 1993 . Aqueous diffusion in repository and backfill environments. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 294: 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crank, J., 1975. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd Ed. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Frape, S. K., Fritz, P., and McNutt, R. H.. 1984 . Water-rock interaction and chemistry of groundwaters from the Canadian Shield. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48: 1617–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillham, R. W., and Cherry, J. A.. Contaminant migration in saturated unconsolidated geologic deposits. In Recent Trends in Hydrology. Narasimhan, T. N., 1982 ed. GSA Special Paper 189, Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancox, W. T., and Nuttall, K.. 1991 . The Canadian approach to safe, permanent disposal of nuclear fuel waste. Nucl. Eng. Design 129: 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, H. B., 1993. Apparatus and procedures for measuring diffusion and distribution coefficients in compacted clays. AECL Research Report, AECL-10981, COG-93–446. AECL Research, Chalk River, Ontario.Google Scholar
Li, Y.-H., and Gregory, S.. 1974 . Diffusion of ions in sea water and in deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 38: 703–714.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L., 1975. Soil Chemical Analysis-Advanced Course, 2nd ed. Madison, Wisconsin: Published by the Author, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Jahnke, F. M., and Radke, C. J.. Electrolyte diffusion in compacted montmorillonite engineered barriers. In Coupled Processes Associated with Nuclear Waste Repositories. Tsang, C.-F., 1987 ed. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, D. J., and Radke, C. J.. 1988 . Caesium and strontium diffusion through sodium montmorillonite at elevated temperature. J. Soil Sci. 39: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, W. D., 1986. Solute diffusivity. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd Ed. Klute, A., ed. Madison, Wisconsin: ASA and SSSA, 1007–1024.Google Scholar
Kim, H.-T., Suk, T.-W., Park, S.-H., and Lee, C.-S.. 1993 . Diffusivities for ions through compacted Na-bentonite with varying dry bulk density. Waste Management 13: 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, D. W., and Douglass, D. C.. 1965 . The effect of ions on the self-diffusion of water. I. Concentration dependence. J. Phys. Chem. 69: 2001–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, H., Zimmerhackl, E., Zeitler, G., Menge, P., and Hecker, W.. 1987 . Influence of liquid/solid ratios in radionuclide migration studies. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 109: 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, K., Ashida, T., Kohara, Y., Yusa, Y., and Sasaki, N.. 1991 . Effect of bulk density on diffusion of cesium in compacted sodium bentonite. Radiochim. Acta 52/53: 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muurinen, A., Rantanen, J., and Penttilä-Hiltunen, P.. 1985 . Diffusion mechanisms of strontium, cesium and cobalt in compacted sodium bentonite. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 50: 617–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. W., and Sommers, L. E.. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R., 1982 eds. Madison Wisconsin: ASA and SSSA, 539–579.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H., 1979. Diffusion of ions and uncharged solutes in soils and clays. Adv. Agron. 31: 225–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. R., and Kemper, W. D.. 1968 . Movement of nutrients to plant roots. Adv. Agron. 20: 91–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oscarson, D. W., 1994. Comparison of measured and calculated diffusion coefficients for iodide in compacted clays. Clay Miner. 29: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oscarson, D. W., and Dixon, D. A.. 1989 . Elemental, mineralogical, and pore-solution composition of selected Canadian clays. AECL Research Report, AECL-9891. AECL Research, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Oscarson, D. W., Dixon, D. A., and Gray, M. N.. 1990 . Swelling capacity and permeability of an unprocessed and a processed bentonitic clay. Eng. Geol. 28: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oscarson, D. W., and Hume, H. B.. 1993 . On the smectite to illite reaction. AECL Research Report, AECL-10842. AECL Research, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Oscarson, D. W., Hume, H. B., and King, F.. 1994 . Sorption of cesium on compacted bentonite. Clays & Clay Miner. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oscarson, D. W., Hume, H. B., Sawatsky, N. G., and Cheung, S. C. H.. 1992 . Diffusion of iodide in compacted bentonite. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56: 1400–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmuson, A., and Neretnieks, I.. 1983 . Surface migration in sorption processes. SKB Technical Report 83–37, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Robin, M. J. L., Gillham, R. W., and Oscarson, D. W.. 1987 . Diffusion of strontium and chloride in compacted clay-based materials. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 1102–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawatsky, N. G., and Oscarson, D. W.. 1991 . Diffusion of technetium in dense bentonite under oxidizing and reducing conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55: 1261–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shainberg, I., and Kemper, W. D.. 1966 . Conductance of alkali cations in aqueous and alcoholic bentonite pastes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30: 700–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skagius, K., and Neretnieks, I.. 1985 . Diffusion measurements of caesium and strontium in biotite gniess. SKB Technical Report 85–15, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Staunton, S., 1986. The self-diffusion of sodium in soil: Factors affecting the surface mobility. J. Soil Sci. 37: 373–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staunton, S., and Nye, P. H.. 1983 . The self diffusion of sodium in a naturally aggregated soil. J. Soil Sci. 34: 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Schaik, J. C., Kemper, W. D., and Olsen, S. R.. 1966 . Contribution of adsorbed cations to diffusion in clay-water systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 30: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar