Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T01:51:05.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification of Clay Minerals by X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

George W. Brindley
George W. Brindley*
Affiliation:
Physics Laboratories, The University, Leeds, England Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since X-ray diffraction patterns are directly related to crystal structures. X-ray identification is, in principal, better suited to the recognition of structural groups and structural varieties than of chemical species.

Well-formed kaolin, mica, and chlorite structures give rise to characteristic 7, 10 and 14Å spacings which are relatively easily identified. Hydrated forms, such as hydrated halloysite (d = 14Å) and montmorillonoids under normal conditions (d= 14Å), are recognized either by low-temperature dehydration giving characteristically diminished spacings, or by the formation of organic complexes giving characteristically increased spacings. This introduces at once the principle that X-ray identification may, and generally does, entail the study of mineral modification by suitable chemical and/or thermal treatment.

The main requirements in the X-ray technique are: (1) Ability to record long spacings up to 2.5Å or even higher values; (2) well focused lines with good resolution; (o) absence of background scattering and white radiation anomalies. Of these, (1) and C) lie within the control of the investigator, but (2) depends partly on the material.

The main difficulties of X-ray identification are: (1) The multiplicity of lines when many components are present, and (2) poorly defined diagrams arising from poor crystallinity and/or small size of crystals. The first can be treated experimentally, but the second is inherent in the problem. Simidification of X-ray diagrams is possible by sedimentation, acid treatment and thermal treatment and by the use of orientated.specimens. Poor quality powder diagrams (if not due to poor technique) are of interest in themselves and may still give valuable information concerning the clay minerals, more particularly when monomineralic or mainly monomineralic fractions are used. Line profiles give valuable indications of randomly displaced layers and of interstratified sequences.

The recognition of chemical species by X-rays is difficult but some progress can be made if pure or nearly pure specimens are obtainable. The recognition of di- and tri-octahedral minerals by the (060) spacing is well known but the recognition of micas and chlorites in any greater detail is difficult. A consideration of basal spacings and basal intensities may make more specific identification possible.

Type
Part III—Methods of Identifying Clays and the Interpretation of Results
Information
Clays and Clay Technology (National Conference on Clays and Clay Technology) , Volume 1 , July 1955 , pp. 119 - 129
Copyright
© Clay Minerals Society 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Alexanian, C Wey, R, Sur l’existence d’uue raie intense à 32Å environ dans le diagramme de rayons X de plaquettes de montinoriHonite orientée Acad. Sci. Paris comptes rendus 1951 232 1855–56.Google Scholar
Kannister, F A Whittard, W F, A magnesian chamosite from the Wenlock limestone of Wickwar, Gloucestershire Mineralog. Mag. 1945 27 90–111.Google Scholar
Bradley, W F, The alternating layer sequence of rec-torite Am. Mineralogist 1950 35 590–595.Google Scholar
Brindley, G W, The effect of grain or particle size on X-ray reflection from mixed powders and alloys, considered in relation to the quantitative determination of crystalline substances by X-rav methods London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philos. Mag. and Jour. Sci. 1945 30 347–369 10.1080/14786444508520918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G W Editor, X-ray identification and crystal Structures of clay minerals 1951 London Mineralog. Soc..Google Scholar
Rrindley, G W MacEwan, DMC, Ceramics—a symposium British Ceramic Soc. Trans. 1953 15–59.Google Scholar
Brindley, G W Goodyear, J, X-ray studies of hal-loysite and metahalloysite. Part II. The transition of halloysite to metahalloysite in relation to relative humidity Mineralog. Mag. 1948 28 407–422.Google Scholar
Brindley, G W Mering, J, Diffractions des rayons X par les structures en couches de Desordonnees. I Acta Crystallographica 1951 4 441–447 10.1107/S0365110X51001409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G W Oughton, B M Robinson, K, Polymorphism of the ehlorites. I. Ordered structures Acta Crystallo-graphica 1950 3 408–416 10.1107/S0365110X50001221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G W Oughton, B M Youell, R F, The crystal structure of amesite and its thermal decomposition Acta Crystallographica 1951 4 552–557 10.1107/S0365110X5100177X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, G W Robinson, K, The structure of kaolinite Mineralog. Mag. 1946 27 242–253.Google Scholar
Brindley, G W Robinson, K, X-ray studies of halloysite and metahalloysite Mineralog. Mag. 1948 28 393–406.Google Scholar
Brindley, G W Robinson, K, Brindley, G W, The chlorite minerals X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals 1951 London Mineralog. Soc. 173–198.Google Scholar
Brown, G, Brindley, G W, Nomenclature of the mica clay minerals X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals 1951 155–172.Google Scholar
Brown, G MacEwan, D M C, The interpretation of X-ray diagrams of soil clays. II. Structures with random inter-stratification Soil Sci. Jour. 1950 1 239–253 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1950.tb00735.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G MacEwan, D M C, Brindley, G W, X-ray diffraction by structures with random interstratification X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals 1951 London Mineralog. Soc. 266–284.Google Scholar
Caillère, S Mathieu-Sicaud, A Henin, S, Nouvel essai d’identification du mineral de la Table pres Allevard, l’alle-vardite Soc. Francais Mineralogie Crvstallographie Bull. 1950 73 193–201 10.3406/bulmi.1950.4707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Engelhardt, W, Die Strukturen von Thuringit, Bavalit und Chamosit und ihre Stellung in der Chloritgruppe (The structures of thuringite, bavalite, and chamosite and their position in the chlorite group) Zeitsehr. Kristallographie 1942 104 142–159.Google Scholar
Grim, R E Bradley, W F, Brindley, G W, The mica clay minerals X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals 1951 London Mineralog. Soc. 138–154.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S B Jefferson, M E, Polymorphism of the micas, with optical measurements Am. Mineralogist 1939 24 729–771.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S B Ross, C S, Lattice limitation of montmorillonite Zeitsehr. Kristallographie 1938 100 251–264.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S B Teller, E, X-ray interference in partiallv ordered laver lattices Jour. Chem. Physics 1942 10 147–167 10.1063/1.1723678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M L Hseung, Y Corey, R B Evans, E J Heuvel, R C V, Weathering sequence of clay-size minerals in soils and sediments. II. Chemical weathering of layer silicates Soil Sci. Soc. America Proc 1952 16 3–6 10.2136/sssaj1952.03615995001600010002x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, P P, Analytical data on reference clay minerals Am. Petroleum Inst. Proj. 1950 New York Columbia University.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D M C, The identification and estimation of montmorillonite group of minerals, with special reference to soil clays Soc. Chem. Industry Jour. 1946 65 298–304 10.1002/jctb.5000651005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEwan, D M C, Brindley, G W, The montmorillonite minerals (mont-morillonoids) X-ray identification and crystal structures of clay minerals 1951 London Mineralog. Soc. 86–137.Google Scholar
MacEwan, D M C Finch, G I, Electron diffraction by montmorillonite Paper read to Clay Minerals Group 1950.Google Scholar
Mering, J, L’interferenee des rayons X dans les systèmes a stratification desordonnee Acta Crystallographica 1949 2 371–377 10.1107/S0365110X49000977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mering, J, Les reflexions des rayons X par les minereux argileux interstratifies Fourth Internat. Cong. Soil Sci., Amsterdam Trans. 1950 3 21–26.Google Scholar
Nagelschmidt, G, X-ray investigations of clays. Part III. The differentiation of micas by X-ray powder photographs Zeitschr. Kristallographie 1937 97 514–521.Google Scholar
Nagelschmidt, G, The identification of clay minerals by means of aggregate X-ray diffraction diagrams Jour. Sci. Instruments 1941 18 100–101 10.1088/0950-7671/18/5/310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagelschmidt, G Gordon, R L Griflin, O G, Surface of finely ground silica Nature 1952 169 538–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, I MacEwan, D M C, Some chloritic minerals of unusual type Clay Minerals Bull. 1951 1 157–162 10.1180/claymin.1951.001.5.06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G F, Distinction of vermiculite, chlorite, and montmorillonite in clays Nature 1949 164 577–578 10.1038/164577b0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, B E, X-ray diffraction in random layer lattices Physical Rev. 1941 59 693–698 10.1103/PhysRev.59.693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilchinsky, Z W, Effect of crystal, grain, and particle size on X-ray power diffracted from powder Acta Crystallographica 1951 4 1–9 10.1107/S0365110X51000015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A J C, X-ray diffraction by random layers, ideal line profiles and determination of structure amplitudes from observed line profiles Acta Crystallographica 1949 2 245–251 10.1107/S0365110X49000631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A J C, Geiger-counter X-ray spectrometer—influence of size and absorption coeffieient of specimen on position and shape of powder diffraction maxima Jour. Sci. Instruments 1950 27 321–325 10.1088/0950-7671/27/12/301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchell, A N, A third study of chlorite Am. Mineralogist 1936 21 642–651.Google Scholar
de Wolff, P M, A theory of X-ray absorption in mixed powders Physica 1937 13 62–78 10.1016/0031-8914(47)90069-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wolff, P M, Multiple Guinier cameras Acta Crystallographica 1948 1 207–211 10.1107/S0365110X48000569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar