Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:13:11.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unique Contributions of Brain Stimulation to the Study of Consciousness: Where Neuroscience Meets Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Stefano Pallanti*
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Extract

True progress in understanding how experience arises from the brain has been relatively slow when viewed from a historical perspective. Recently, several technologies to study and stimulate the brain have been applied to this field of inquiry. Such progress was made only 2,500 years after the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides first adopted a technical procedure involving the application of formal logic instruments to explore the perception of experiences.

At the phenomenological level, consciousness has been referred to as “what vanishes every night when we fall into dreamless sleep and reappears when we wake up or when we dream. It is also all we are and all we have: lose consciousness and, as far as you are concerned, your own self, and the entire world dissolves into nothingness”. According to the integrated information theory, consciousness is integrated information.

The term “consciousness” therefore has two key senses: wakefulness and awareness. Wakefulness is a state of consciousness distinguished from coma or sleep. Having one's eyes open is generally an indication of wakefulness and we usually assume that anyone who is awake will also be aware. Awareness implies not merely being conscious but also being conscious of something. The broad definition of consciousness includes a large range of processes that we normally regard as unconscious (eg, blindsight or priming by neglected or masked stimuli).

Both sleep and anesthesia are reversible states of eyes-closed unresponsiveness to environmental stimuli in which the individual lacks both wakefulness and awareness. In contrast to sleep, where sufficient stimulation will return the individual to wakefulness, even the most vigorous exogenous stimulation cannot produce awakening in a patient under an adequate level of general anesthesia.

Type
Brain Stimulation
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Tononi, G. Consciousness as integrated information: a Provisional Manifesto. Biol Bull. 2008;215:216242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Tononi, G. An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neurosci. 2004;5:42.Google Scholar
3.Zeman, A. What in the world is consciousness? Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:110.Google Scholar
4.Massimini, M, Ferrarelli, F, Huber, R, Esser, SK, Singh, H, Tononi, G. Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science. 2005;309:22282232.Google Scholar
5.Mashour, GA. Altered states: LSD and the Anesthesia Laboratory of Henry Knowles Beecher. Bull Anesth Hist. 2005;23:1114.Google Scholar
6.Mashour, GA. Uncoscious processes in psychoanalysis and anesthesiology. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;46:195202.Google Scholar
7.Schiff, ND, Giacino, JT, Kalmar, K, et al.Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature. 2007;448:600603.Google Scholar
8.Gillet, GR. The subjective brain, identity and neuroethics. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9:513.Google Scholar
9.Amassian V, E, Cracco, RQ, Maccabee, PJ, Cracco J, B, Rudeli, A, Eberle, L. Suppresion of visual prception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalogram Neurophysiol. 1989;74:458462.Google Scholar
10.Kammer, T. Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychol Res. 2007;71:659666.Google Scholar
11.Matthews, N, Luber, B, Qian, N, Lisanby, SH. Transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially affects speed and direction judgments. Exp Brain Res. 2001;140:397406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Silvanto, J, Muggleton N, G, Cowey, A, Walsh, V. Neural adaptation reveals state-dipendent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:18741881.Google Scholar
13Bar, M. A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:600609.Google Scholar
14.Ganis, G, Schendan, HE, Kosskyn, SM. Neuroimaging evidence for object model verification theory: Role of prefrontal control in visual object categorization. Neuroimage. 2007;34:384398.Google Scholar
15.Bestmann, S, Ruff, CC, Blakemore, C, Driver, J, Thilo, KV. Spatial attention chenages excitability of human visual cortex to direct stimulation. Curr Biol. 2007;17:134139.Google Scholar
16.Romei, V, Brodbeck, V, Michel, C, Amedi, A, Pascual-Leone, A, Thut, G. Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:20102018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Silvanto, J, Cowey, A, Lavie, N, Walsh, V. Making the blindsighted see. Neuropsychology. 2007;45:33463350.Google Scholar
18.Boyer, JL, Harrison, S, Ro, T. Unconscious processing of orientation and color without primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:1687516879.Google Scholar
19.Jolij, J, Lamme, VA. Repression of unconscious information by conscious processing; evidence from affective blindsight induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:1074710751.Google Scholar
20.Urgesi, C, Moro, V, Candidi, M, Aglioti, SM. Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. J Neurosci. 2006;26:79427949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Fadiga, L, Fogassi, L, Pavesi, G, Rizzolatti, GJ. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73:26082611.Google Scholar
22.Lou, HC, Luber, B, Crupain, M, et al.Parietal cortex and representation of the mental Self. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:68276832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed