Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T06:22:50.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-Term Effects of Once-Daily Valbenazine in Older and Younger Adults with Tardive Dyskinesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2022

Martha Sajatovic
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
Khody Farahmand
Affiliation:
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
Chirag Shah
Affiliation:
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
Leslie Lundt
Affiliation:
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Older patients taking a dopamine receptor blocking agent (eg, first- or second-generation antipsychotic) have an increased risk for tardive dyskinesia (TD), a persistent and potentially disabling movement disorder. Valbenazine, a selective and potent vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor, is approved for once-daily treatment of TD with no dosing adjustments required for older patients. This analysis of valbenazine clinical trial data, which is the first to evaluate an approved TD medication in a population ≥65 years, was conducted to better understand treatment outcomes in older patients.

Methods

Data from two 48-week long-term studies (KINECT 3-extension, KINECT 4) were pooled and analyzed in older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) participants. Analyses based on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) total score included: mean change from baseline (BL); clinically meaningful response (≥30% improvement from BL [AIMS-30%]); and protocol-defined response (≥50% improvement from BL [AIMS-50%]). Additional analyses included response thresholds for Clinical Global Improvement-Tardive Dyskinesia and Patient Global Impression of Change as follows: rating of “minimally improved” or better (score ≤3) at week 48 (CGI-TD≤3, PGIC≤3); rating of “much improved” or “very much improved” (score ≤2) at week 48 (CGI-TD≤2, PGIC≤2).

Results

AIMS outcomes in the older subgroup were generally comparable to (or better than) outcomes in the younger subgroup and overall study populations. In participants ≥65 years, pooled AIMS results indicated substantial improvements in TD movements with valbenazine 40 mg (n = 8) and 80 mg (n = 20): mean change from BL (−6.4 and −9.8 [for 40 and 80 mg, respectively]); AIMS-30% (75% and 95%); AIMS-50% (75% and 85%). CGI-TD and PGIC response rates indicated that clinician- and patient-reported global improvements were also substantial in the older subgroup: CGI-TD = 3 (88% and 100% [for 40 and 80 mg, respectively]); CGI-TD = 2 (88% and 95%); PGIC = 3 (88% and 100%); PGIC = 2 (75% and 90%).

Conclusions

These analyses, which are the first to evaluate long-term valbenazine effects in patients ≥65 years, indicate that older study participants had clinically meaningful and substantial improvements in TD that were comparable to (or better than) those in younger participants.

Funding

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press