Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T06:17:17.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative Courts and the Concept of Community. A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Lawrence Rosen
Affiliation:
Princeton University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Land and Law
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

2 Galanter, Marc, “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don’t Know (and Think We Know) about Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 U.C.L.A. L. Rev. 3 (1983)Google Scholar. Indeed, in the colonial period, where Auerbach finds considerable use of community dispute resolution, Galanter, citing the studies of historians, states: “In Accomack County, Virginia, in 1639, the litigation rate of 240 per thousand was more than four times that in any contemporary American county for which we have data. In a seven year period, 20% of the adult population appeared in court five or more times as parties or witnesses. In Salem County, Massachusetts, about 11% of the adult men were involved in court conflicts during the year 1683” (p. 41, footnotes omitted).