Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:38:43.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archived Voices, Acoustic Traces, and the Reverberations of Kurdish History in Modern Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2019

Marlene Schäfers
Marlene Schäfers*
Affiliation:
Department of Conflict and Development Studies, Middle East and North Africa Research Group (MENARG), Ghent University, Belgium
*
Marlene.Schafers@ugent.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates how middle-aged to elderly Kurdish women in Turkey engage with large collections of Kurdish music recordings in their possession. Framing them as archives, women mobilize these collections as central elements in a larger, ongoing Kurdish project of historical critique, which seeks to resist hegemonic state narratives that have long denied and marginalized Kurdish voices. While recognizing the critical intervention such archives make, the article contends that, to be heard as “history” with a legitimate claim to authority, subaltern voices often have to rely on the very hegemonic forms, genres, and discourses they set out to challenge. This means that subaltern projects of historical critique walk a fine line between critique and complicity, an insight that nuances narratives that would approach subaltern voices predominantly from a perspective of resistance. At the same time, this article argues that a more complete picture of subaltern archives requires us to attend to the voices they contain not just as metaphors for resistance or political representation but also as acoustic objects that have social effects because of the way they sound. By outlining the affective qualities that voice recordings held for the Kurdish women who archived them, the article shows how their collections participated in carving out specific, gendered subject positions as well as forging a broader Kurdish sociality. Paying attention to history's “acoustic register” (Hunt 2008), this suggests, promises to open up perspectives on subaltern historiography that go beyond binary frameworks of resistance and domination, critique and complicity.

Keywords

archivevoicesilenceKurdsTurkeysubalternhistorical critiqueacousticsaffect
Type
Sonic History
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 447 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altınay, Ayşe Gül, ed. 2007. Ebru: Reflections on Cultural Diversity in Turkey. Istanbul: Metis.Google Scholar
Amy de la Bretèque, Estelle. 2012. Voices of Sorrow: Melodized Speech, Laments, and Heroic Narratives among the Yezidis of Armenia. Yearbook for Traditional Music 44: 129–48.Google Scholar
Bieberstein, Alice Von. 2017. Treasure/Fetish/Gift: Hunting for ‘Armenian Gold’ in Post-Genocide Turkish Kurdistan. Subjectivity 10, 2: 170–89.Google Scholar
Biehl, João, Good, Byron, and Kleinman, Arthur. 2007. Subjectivity: Ethnographic Investigations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997a. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997b. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Çakır, Argun. 2017. The Appeal to Oral Tradition in Kurdish Historiography: An Investigation on the Use of the Textual Contents of Kilam-s as Historical Data. Presentation at the conference “Kurdish Futures in and outside of Iraq, Syria, Turkey, and Iran: Fresh Hopes or New Tragedies,” University of Exeter, 26–28 June.Google Scholar
Çelik, Adnan. 2017. Cent Ans de Malédiction. In Chabot, Joceline, Doucet, Marie-Michèle, Kasparian, Sylvia, and Thibault, Jean-François, eds., Le génocide des Arméniens: Représentations, Traces et Mémoires. Quebec: Presses de l'Université Laval, 135–48.Google Scholar
Çelik, Adnan and Dinç, Namık Kemal. 2015. Yüz Yıllık Ah! Toplumsal Hafızanın İzinde 1915 Diyarbekir. Istanbul: İsmail Beşikçi Vakfı.Google Scholar
Çelik, Adnan and Öpengin, Ergin. 2016. The Armenian Genocide in the Kurdish Novel: Restructuring Identity through Collective Memory. European Journal of Turkish Studies, Complete List, http://ejts.revues.org/5291.Google Scholar
Çetin, Fethiye and Altınay, Ayşe Gül. 2009. Torunlar. Istanbul: Metis.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena, Kleinman, Arthur, Ramphele, Mamphela, and Reynolds, Pamela, eds. 2000. Violence and Subjectivity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Düzgün, Cevahir Sadak, Akyol, Hilmi, Gazi, Mustafa, Kadri Avcı, Mehmet, and Günal, Melike, eds. 2007. Antolojiya Dengbêjan: Türkiye'de Kültürel Hakların Desteklenmesi, Kültürel Destek Hibe Programı (Cisgs) Dengbêj ve Dengbêjlik Geleneği Programı. Diyarbakır: Diyarbakır Büyük Şehir Belediyesi.Google Scholar
Eidsheim, Nina Sun. 2008. Voice as a Technology of Selfhood: Towards an Analysis of Racialized Timbre and Vocal Performance. PhD diss., University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Farge, Arlette. 2013. The Allure of the Archives. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Feld, Steven and Fox, Aaron A.. 1994. Music and Language. Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 25–53.Google Scholar
Feld, Steven, Fox, Aaron A., Porcello, Thomas, and Samuels, David. 2004. Vocal Anthropology: From the Music of Language to the Language of Song. In Duranti, Alessandro, ed., A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, 321–45.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality, Volume 3. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1989. Clues: Roots of an Evidential Paradigm. In Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 96–125.Google Scholar
Hamelink, Wendelmoet. 2016. The Sung Home: Narrative, Morality, and the Kurdish Nation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Harkness, Nicholas. 2013. Songs of Seoul: An Ethnography of Voice and Voicing in Christian South Korea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hirschler, Konrad. 2001. Defining the Nation: Kurdish Historiography in Turkey in the 1990s. Middle Eastern Studies 37, 3: 145–66.Google Scholar
Hunt, Nancy Rose. 2008. An Acoustic Register, Tenacious Images, and Congolese Scenes of Rape and Repetition. Cultural Anthropology 23, 2: 220–53.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako. 2006. Vicarious Language: Gender and Linguistic Modernity in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1990. Registering Affect: Heteroglossia in the Linguistic Expression of Emotion. In Abu-Lughod, Lila and Lutz, Catherine A., eds., Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 126–61.Google Scholar
Jamison, Kelda. 2016. Hefty Dictionaries in Incomprehensible Tongues: Commensurating Code and Language Community in Turkey. Anthropological Quarterly 89, 1: 31–62.Google Scholar
Karasu, Doğan, Hülakü, Ahmet, Korkmazcan, Orhan, Güleryüz, Devrim, and Güngör, Özlem, eds. 2007. Bingöl Dengbêjleri. Istanbul: Peri.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 1997. From Fetishism to Sincerity: On Agency, the Speaking Subject, and Their Historicity in the Context of Religious Conversion. Comparative Studies in Society and History 39, 4: 674–93.Google Scholar
Kevirbirî, Salih. 2004. Filîtê Quto: Yirmi Olay, Yirmi Kılam. Istanbul: Evrensel.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, Laura. 2014. Voicing Subjects: Public Intimacy and Mediation in Kathmandu. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kuruoğlu, Alev P. and Ger, Güliz. 2015. An Emotional Economy of Mundane Objects. Consumption Markets & Culture 18, 3: 209–38.Google Scholar
Neyzi, Leyla. 2010. Oral History and Memory Studies in Turkey. In Kerslake, Celia, Öktem, Kerem, and Robins, Philip, eds., Turkey's Engagement with Modernity: Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 443–59.Google Scholar
Neyzi, Leyla and Darıcı, Haydar. 2013. “Özgürüm ama Mecburiyetim Var”: Diyarbakırlı ve Muğlalı Gençler Anlatıyor. Istanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Ochoa Gautier, Ana María. 2014. Aurality: Listening and Knowledge in Nineteenth-Century Colombia. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Özyürek, Esra. 2006. Nostalgia for the Modern: State Secularism and Everyday Politics in Turkey. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Özyürek, Esra, ed. 2007. The Politics of Public Memory in Turkey. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Papailias, Penelope. 2005. Genres of Recollection: Archival Poetics and Modern Greece. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reigle, Robert F. 2013. A Brief History of Kurdish Music Recordings in Turkey. Hellenic Journal of Music, Education, and Culture 4, 1, http://hejmec.eu/journal/index.php/HeJMEC/article/view/41.Google Scholar
Scalbert-Yücel, Clémence. 2009. The Invention of a Tradition: Diyarbakır's Dengbêj Project. European Journal of Turkish Studies 10, http://ejts.revues.orgwww.ejths.revues.org/4055.Google Scholar
Schäfers, Marlene. 2017. Writing against Loss: Kurdish Women, Subaltern Authorship, and the Politics of Voice in Contemporary Turkey. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23, 3: 543–61.Google Scholar
Schäfers, Marlene. 2018. ‘It Used to Be Forbidden’: Kurdish Women and the Limits of Gaining Voice. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies 14, 1: 3–24.Google Scholar
Spence, Louise and Avcı, Aslı Kotaman. 2013. The Talking Witness Documentary: Remembrance and the Politics of Truth. Rethinking History 17, 3: 295–311.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence, eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.Google Scholar
Steedman, Carolyn. 2002. Dust: The Archive and Cultural History. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Martin. 2010. The Republic of Love: Cultural Intimacy in Turkish Popular Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. 2010. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strohmeier, Martin. 2003. Crucial Images in the Presentation of a Kurdish National Identity: Heroes and Patriots, Traitors and Foes. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tambar, Kabir. 2013. Historical Critique and Political Voice after the Ottoman Empire. History of the Present 3, 2: 119–39.Google Scholar
Tambar, Kabir. 2014. The Reckoning of Pluralism: Political Belonging and the Demands of History in Turkey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael. 1992. The Nervous System. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tortorici, Zeb. 2015. Archival Seduction: Indexical Absences and Historiographical Ghosts. Archive Journal 5, http://www.archivejournal.net/essays/archival-seduction/ (accessed 21 Nov. 2018).Google Scholar
Weidman, Amanda. 2007. Stage Goddesses and Studio Divas in South India: On Agency and the Politics of Voice. In McElhinny, Bonnie S., ed., Words, Worlds, and Material Girls: Language, Gender, Globalization. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 131–55.Google Scholar
Weidman, Amanda. 2014a. Anthropology and Voice. Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 37–51.Google Scholar
Weidman, Amanda. 2014b. Neoliberal Logics of Voice: Playback Singing and Public Femaleness in South India. Culture, Theory and Critique 55, 2: 175–93.Google Scholar
Yüksel, Metin. 2010. Dengbêj, Mullah, Intelligentsia: The Survival and Revival of the Kurdish-Kurmanji Language in the Middle East, 1925–1960. PhD diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar