Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:30:45.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History, Anthropology, and the Study of Everyday Life. A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Eve Rosenhaft
Eve Rosenhaft
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Thin Line of Culture
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 99 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Judt, Tony, “A clown in regal purple: Social history and the historians,” History Workshop Journal 7 (Spring 1979), 66–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eley, Geoff and Nield, Keith, “Why does social history ignore olitics?,” Social History 5 (1980), 249–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Most notably, Kater, Michael, “Begrifflichkeit und Historie” [review article], Archiv für Sozialgeschichte XXIII (1983), 688–705Google Scholar. For a more persuasive critique, as part of a new “fin-desiècle” backlash against the 1960s' version of Enlightenment, see Kocka, Jürgen, “Zurück zur Erzählung? Plädoyer f7ür historische Argumentation,” Geschicte und Gesellschaft 10 (1954), 409–20Google Scholar.

3 Goddard, David, “Anthropology: the limits of functional ism,” in Ideology in Social Science, edited by Blackburn, Robin (Glasgow, 1972), 61–75Google Scholar.

4 I am thinking here particularly of the work of the Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies on working-class youth subcultures.