Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T01:46:14.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Elites in Advanced Industrial Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

James Davison Hunter
James Davison Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In primitive and nonindustrialized societies the typical (and in many cases, the exclusive) tasks of religious elites have revolved chiefly around the creation, modification, and maintenance of the symbolic universe of society. Such work invariably implied privilege and various kinds and degrees of political power. But with the expansion of the modern world order, the situation of religious elites has altered dramatically. For one, religious-knowledge workers make up a very small percentage of the ranks of a much larger knowledge sector. For example, while the percentage of religious-knowledge workers (including clergy) relative to the entire economically active population in the United States has remained relatively constant since 1870, the percentage of religious workers to the knowledge workers has declined by one half in the period between 1950 and 1970—a period of dramatic growth of the knowledge sector (see Table 1). By 1970, the percentage of religious-knowledge workers to knowledge workers generally had shrunk to one sixth of its proportionate size a century earlier. Between 1970 and 1984, this proportion has leveled off somewhat. In Western Europe and Japan the same patterns have become firmly established as well.

Type
The Limited Power of the Clergy
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 360 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The actual figures are as follows:

Source: United States, Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Statistical Abstracts of the United States: 1980 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1981), 418ffGoogle Scholar.; idem, Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1975), 139ff. Directly comparable data were not available for Western Europe and Asia, though information presented in Barrett, DonaldBarrett, Donald , The World Christian Encyclopedia (Nairobi: Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar, points to the same general trends.

2 This, of course, is not to say that religious-knowledge workers do not perform functions in modern societies. They do, but their greatest influence is in the private sphere concerning spiritual, moral, and human relational problems.

3 Mannheim, Karl, Ideology and Utopia, Wirth, L. and Shils, E., trans. (New York: Harcourt Brace and World, 1935)Google Scholar.

4 Hadden, Jeffrey, The Gathering Storm in the Churches (New York: Doubleday, 1970), 7Google Scholar.

5 Ibid., 155.

6 Cox, Harvey, “The New Breed in American Churches: Sources of Social Activism in American Religion,” Daedalus, 96 (Winter 1967), 135–50Google Scholar.

7 Quinley, Harold, “Hawks and Doves among the Clergy,” Ministry Studies 3 (1969), 5–23Google Scholar; idem, “The Protestant Clergy and the War in Vietnam, ” Public Opinion Quarterly, 34:1 (Spring 1970), 43–52; idem. The Prophetic Clergy (New York: Wiley, 1974); Stark, Rodney, Foster, Bruce, Glock, Charles, and Quinley, Harold, Wayward Shepherds: Prejudice and the Protestant Clergy (New York: Harper and Row, 1971)Google Scholar.

8 Leiffer, Murray, Changing Expectations and Ethics in the Professional Ministry (Evanston: Garrett Theological Seminary, 1969)Google Scholar.

9 Alston, Jon, Peek, Charles, and Wingrove, C. Ray, “Religiosity in Black Militancy: A Reappraisal,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11:3 (1972), 252–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Jeffries, Vincent and Tygart, Clarence, “The Influence of Theology Denomination, and Values upon the Positions of Clergy on Social Issues,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13:3 (1974), 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Berenson, William, Elifson, Kirk, and Tollerson, Tandy, “Preachers in Politics: A Study of Political Activism among the Black Ministry,” Journal of Black Studies, 6 (1966), 373–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Murphy, Steven, “A Note on Clergy-Laity Differences among Lutherans,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11:2 (1972), 177–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. 178.

13 Berk, Marc, “Pluralist Theory and Church Policy Positions on Racial and Sexual Equality,” Sociological Analysis, 39 (1978), 338–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Lull, Timothy, “Those Conservative Lutherans,” in The Anatomy of Faith, Johnson, Roger A., ed. (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983), 7Google Scholar.

15 Lull, “Those Conservative Lutherans, ” 14–15; Cf. Lutheran Panel, Unpublished research findings, Office of Planning Research and Evaluation, Lutheran Church in America, New York, 1978.

16 Presbyterian Panel, Unpublished research findings, Research Division of the Support Agency, United Presbyterian Church, USA, New York, 1977; Cf. Wuthnow, Robert, “The Current Moral Climate: What Pastors Think,” Theology Today, 36 (07 1979), 239–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Wuthnow, “Current Moral Climate, ” 240.

18 Wuthnow, Robert, “The Political Rebirth of American Evangelicalism,” in The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimation, Liebman, Robert and Wuthnow, Robert, eds. (Chicago: Aldine, 1983), 168–85Google Scholar.

19 Gallup, George, “Evangelical Christianity in the United States,” Unpublished report, Princeton Religious Research Center Princeton, 1979Google Scholar; cf. Hunter, J. D., “The Young Evangelicals and the New Class,” Review of Religious Research 22:2 (1980), 155–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Hunter, J. D., American Evangelicalism: Conservative Religion and the Quandary of Modernity (New Brunswick: Rutgers, 1983)Google Scholar; idem, Evangelicalism: The Coming Generation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), ch. 5.

21 Liebman, Robert, “The Making of the New Christian Right,” in The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimation, Liebman, Robert and Wuthnow, Robert, eds. (Chicago: Aldine, 1983), 229–38Google Scholar.

22 Hunter, Evangelicalism: The Coming Generation, ch. 5.

23 Wiley, Norbert, “Religious and Political Liberalism among Catholics,” Sociological Analysis, 28:3 (1967), 142–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Greeley, Andrew, Priests in the United States (New York: Doubleday, 1972), 91Google Scholar.

25 Varicalli, Joseph, Toward the Establishment of a Liberal Catholicism (Washington, D C.: University Press of America, 1983)Google Scholar; Stewart, James, “The Changing Role of the Catholic Priest and His Ministry in an Inner City Context,” Sociological Analysis, 30:2 (Summer 1969), 81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 The Jewish case is unique. To be sure, as Schuller, David, Strommen, Morton, and Brekke, Milo, eds., Ministry in America (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1980)Google Scholar, show, rabbis as an aggregate in North America are generally more liberal than the Jewish laity. Yet the Jewish community globally has the appearance of being universally more liberal than the populations of their host societies. There are several plausible explanations for this, which Medding, Peter, “Toward a General Theory of Jewish Political Interest and Behavior,” Jewish Journal of Sociology, 14:2 (1977), 115–44Google Scholar, reviews. Medding himself argues that, while Jewish political interests and ideology are typically left-liberal, this is not always so, as witness the cases of Romania, Poland, and South Africa between the world wars. By and large, Jewish ethnic interests are paramount over class interests, the former being defined as (1) survival of the group, (2) capacity for Jews to participate fully and freely in their host societies, (3) the freedom of Jews to establish their own distinctive social organization, and (4) the capacity for Jews to concentrate their own economic interests. Medding contends that “the major concern [of Jews] is to achieve a maximum degree of stability irrespective of the nature of the regime. The specific Jewish political response will be inversely related to the direction from which the greatest perceived threat to Jewish micro-political interests is seen to come” (p. 123). It just so happens that in most (but not all) cases Jewry is best served by a liberal or open society. It is of interest that the Jewish alliance with the New Left in America tended to be against many of its class and ethnic interests (see Glazer, Nathan, “The New Left and the Jews,” Jewish Journal of Sociology, 11:2 (1969), 121–31Google Scholar.

27 Schuller, Morton, and Brekke, , eds., Ministry in America, cf. 130–31Google Scholar.

28 Institute for Educational Affairs and the Roper Center, “Theology Faculty Survey,” This World, 2 (Summer 1982), 28–75Google Scholar; Cf. Novak, Michael, “A Stunning Survey: Notes and Comments,” This World, 2 (Summer 1982), 101–8Google Scholar.

29 Research and Forecasts, Inc., The Connecticut Mutual Life Report on American Values in the 80s: The Impact of Belief (New York: Research and Forecasts, Inc., 1980)Google Scholar.

30 Jarvis, Peter, “The Ministry-Laity Relationship: A Case of Potential Conflict,” Sociological Analysis, 37:1 (Spring 1976), 74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Wicker, Brian, First the Political Kingdom: A Personal Appraisal of the Catholic Left in Britain (Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1965)Google Scholar.

32 Streib, Gordon, “Attitudes of the Irish toward Changes in the Catholic Church,” Social Compass. 20 (1973), 49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Bocock, Robert, “Anglo-Catholic Socialism: A Study of a Protest Movement within a Church,” Social Compass, 20:1 (1973), 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, cf. 33ff.; Evans, S., The Social Hope of the Christian Churches (London: Stoughton and Hodder, 1965)Google Scholar.

34 Norman, Edward, Church and Society in England, 1770–1970 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976)Google Scholar ch. 10; Russell, Anthony, The Clerical Profession (London: SPCK, 1980)Google Scholar ch. 18; Martin, David, “The Cultural Politics of Established Churches,” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 6: 1–2 (1979), 283–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “The Revs and Revolutions, ” Encounter, 52:6 (1979); idem, “Disorientations to Mainstream Religion, ” in The Social Impact of the New Religious Movements, Bryan R. Wilson, ed. (New York: Rose of Sharon. 1981), 43–58; idem, “Revived Dogma and New Cult, ” Daedalus, 3:1 (1982), 53–72.

35 I would like to thank David Martin for providing the marginals on an unpublished survey from the British Opinion Research Centre entitled “Attitudes of the Church of England Clergy. ” This survey was conducted in 1981.

36 Bruce, Steve, “Defending the Faith: Militant Protestantism in Modern Scotland,” manuscript, The Queen's University in Belfast, 1982Google Scholar.

37 Dekker, G., “Opkomst der Evangelischen,” manuscript, Free University of Amsterdam, 1980Google Scholar; idem, “Power and Powerlessness of the New Clergy” (paper presented at the Oxford Symposium, Blackfriars, November 1981).

38 Dobbelaire, Karel, “Professionalization and Secularization in the Belgian Catholic Pillar,” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 6 (1979), 39–65Google Scholar.

39 Cf. Martin, “Cultural Politics.”

40 Mushaben, Joyce Marie, “Cycles of Peace Protest in West Germany: Experiences from Three Decades” (paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Detroit, 09 1983)Google Scholar.

41 Becker, Carl, “The Sinto Syndrome: Religion and Political Ideology in Japan” (paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Providence, 10 1982)Google Scholar.

42 Swnygedouw, Jan, “Japanese Religions and the Anti-Nuclear Movement,” Japanese Religions, 12:3 (1982), 25–40Google Scholar.

43 Broadbent, Jeff, “Buddhism and Shintoism as Analytic Components of Political Action in Japan” (paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Providence, 10 1982)Google Scholar.

44 Broadbent, Jeff, “Environmental Movements in Japan: Citizen versus State Mobilization” (paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, 09 1983)Google Scholar.

45 “Report of the Consultation on Inter-Religious Dialogue with Special Reference to World Peace,” Contemporary Religions in Japan, 10:1 (1970)Google Scholar.

46 Swnygedouw, “Japanese Religions.”

47 Ibid.

48 Pratt, Henry J., “Organizational Stress and Adaptation to Changing Political Status: The Case of the National Council of Churches of Christ in the United States,” in The Church in Modern Society, Martin, Leo, ed. (Los Angeles: Sage, 1977), 95Google Scholar.

49 Ibid., 101.

50 Pratt, Henry J., The Liberalization of American Protestantism (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1972), 112ffGoogle Scholar.

51 Ibid., 120.

52 Derr, Thomas Seiger, “The Economic Thought of the World Council of Churches,” This World, 1 (Spring 1982), 20–33, 31Google Scholar; Norman, Edward, Christianity and the World Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Neuhaus, Richard J., “The World Council of Churches and Radical Chic” (Washington, D.C.: Ethics and Public Policy Center, Georgetown University, 1977)Google Scholar.

53 On liberation theology in America generally, see the perceptive dissertation by Hettinger, Cynthia, “The Importation of an Ideology: The American Theological Response to Latin American Liberation Theology” (Ph.D. diss., Rutgers University, 1980)Google Scholar.

54 Janosik, Robert J., “Religion and Political Involvement: A Study of Black African Sects,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13:2 (1973), 161–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Johnson, Benton, “Theology and the Position of Pastors on Public Issues,” American Sociological Review, 32 (06 1967), 433–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cf. Hadden, Gathering Storm; Stark et al., Wayward Shepherds; Hunter, J. D., American Evangelicalism; Conservative Religion and the Quandary of Modernity (New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

56 Berk, “Pluralist Theory. ”

57 Wood, James R., “Authority and Controversial Policy: The Churches and Civil Rights,” American Sociological Review, 35 (12 1970): 1057–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

58 Hammond, Phillip E. and Mitchell, Robert, “Segmentation of Radicalism: The Case of the Protestant Campus Minister,” American Journal of Sociology, 71:2 (09 1965), 133–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Underwood, Kenneth, The Church, the University, and Social Policy (Middletown, Conn., Wesleyan University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Bocock, “Anglo-Catholic Socialism. ”

59 Berenson et al. “Preachers in Politics”; Murphy, “Note on Clergy-Laity Differences.”

60 Lutheran Panel, Unpublished research findings.

61 I make no presumption that knowledge workers in advanced capitalist societies are, out of some sort of structural necessity, left-liberal or even adversarial. Such arguments have been made but they are irrelevant to the present argument. I only note the large amount of evidence showing that the political and ideological configuration of knowledge elites has been (from the post- World War II period to the early 1980s) both adversarial and left of center. Religious elites are merely responding to this configuration. For evidence on the political and ideological values of knowledge elites generally, see Gouldner, Alvin. “The New Class Project I,” Theory and Society, 6 (09 1978a), 153–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “The New Class Project II, ” Theory and Society, 1 (November 1978b), 343–89; Ladd, Carl E., “Pursuing the New Class: Social Theory and Survey,” in The New Class? Bruce-Briggs, B., ed. (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1979)Google Scholar; Brint, Steven, “Stirrings of an Oppositional Elite?: The Social Base and Historical Trajectory of Upper White Collar Dissent in the United States, 1960–1980” (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1980)Google Scholar.

62 See, for example, Research and Forecasts, Connecticut Mutual Life Report, 212. Occupational prestige studies show the same preferences.

63 This is suggested by research which shows that membership in the mainline religious denominations has been declining significantly since the early 1960s, when mainline pastors became more vocal politically. By contrast, conservative churches have shown growth during this period, perhaps picking up defectors from the mainline churches. See Kelley, Dean, Why Conservative Churches Are Growing (New York: Harper and Row, 1977)Google Scholar.

64 See Hunter, J. D., “The Liberal Reaction to the New Christian Right,” in The New Christian Right, Liebman, Robert and Wuthnow, Robert, eds. (New York: Aldine, 1983), 149–63Google Scholar.