Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T05:28:11.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolutionism Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Pamela J. Utz
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robert, Nisbet, ‘The Irreducibility of Social Change: A Comment on Prof. Stebbin's Paper’, Pacific Sociological Review, 8 (1965), p. 12;Google ScholarBock, K. E., ‘Evolution, Function, and Change’, in Readings in Social Evolution and Development, ed. by Eisenstadt, S. N. (Great Britain, 1970), p. 193;CrossRefGoogle ScholarFrederick, Teggart, Theory and Processes of History (Berkeley, 1941).Google Scholar

2 See Dobzhansky, T., Mankind Evolving (New Haven, 1962), pp. 10, 1517, 128–59;Google ScholarSimpson, G. G., The Major Features of Evolution (New York, 1953), passim.Google Scholar

3 See Burrow, J. W., Evolution and Society (Cambridge, 1966) for a discussion of the peculiarly Victorian brand of evolutionism.Google Scholar