Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T11:35:14.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperial but Not Colonial: Archival Truths, British India, and the Case of the “Naughty” Tibetans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Carole McGranahan
Carole McGranahan*
Affiliation:
Anthropology and History, University of Colorado
*
carole.mcgranahan@colorado.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What truths are available in imperial archives for non-colonial subjects? Tibet was never colonized by the British, and yet was drawn into the British imperial domain in ways that impacted both political history and historiography. In the 1940s, Tibetan intellectual Rapga Pangdatsang based his Tibetan Improvement Party in Kalimpong, India where he soon ran afoul of colonial officials who thought he was a Chinese spy. By drawing on multiple archival, ethnographic, and historic sources, I show how the story of Rapga Pangdatsang and the first Tibetan political party enables a recalibrating of both Tibetan and British imperial history. It also opens up a consideration of empire beyond the colonial, and speaks more broadly to a consideration of the non-colonial as a thus-far overlooked aspect of empire.

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 68 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On Nepali Gurkha soldiers in the British and Indian armies, see Caplan, Lionel, Warrior Gentleman: “Gurkhas” in the Western Imagination (Providence: Berghahn Books, 1995)Google Scholar; Mary DesChene, Relics of Empire: A Cultural History of the Gurkhas, 1815–1987, PhD diss., Stanford University, 1991.

2 Lahiri, Shompa, “Performing Identities: Colonial Migrants, Passing and Mimicry between the Wars,” Cultural Geographies 10 (2003): 408–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bhabha, Homi, The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994)Google Scholar.

3 India Office Record (henceforth IOR): MSS EUR D998/17 Hopkinson.

4 In keeping with Tibetan convention, I reserve the singular name “Pangdatsang” for Rapga's older brother, Yamphel, the family head. I refer to Rapga Pangdatsang as he was and is referred to by his contemporaries, as either “Pangda Rapga” or simply as “Rapga.”

5 The full citation is IOR: L/P+S/12/4211 no. 36, file 39(1) Tibet: Chinese Intrigues (Rapga).

6 On this period, see McGranahan, Carole, “Empire and the Status of Tibet: British, Chinese, and Tibetan Negotiations, 1913–1934,” in McKay, Alex, ed., The History of Tibet, Volume 3: The Tibetan Encounter with Modernity (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2003), 267–95Google Scholar.

7 IOR: L/P+S/12/4211 no. 36, file 39(1), Tibet: Chinese Intrigues (Rapga), Hopkinson to Foreign New Delhi, 29 Apr. 1946.

8 Stoler, Ann Laura, “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance,” Archival Science 2 (2002): 87–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Archival Dis-Ease: Thinking Through Colonial Ontologies,” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 7, 2 (2010): 215–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 218.

9 Stoler, Ann Laura, Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

10 Dirks, Nicholas B., “Annals of the Archive: Ethnographic Notes on the Sources of History,” in Axel, Brian, ed., From the Margins: Historical Anthropology and Its Futures (Durham: Duke University Press 2002), 47–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 58.

11 Ibid., 63; Guha, Ranajit, Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

12 Richards, Thomas, The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire (London: Verso, 1993), 11Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., 6, 12.

14 Dirks, “Annals,” 56.

15 Cohn, Bernard, An Anthropologist among the Historians and other Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

16 Bell, Sir Charles, Tibet Past and Present (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publications, 1992 [1924])Google Scholar; The People of Tibet (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publications, 1992 [1928])Google Scholar; and Portrait of a Dalai Lama: The Life and Times of the Great Thirteenth (London: Wisdom Publications, 1987 [1946])Google Scholar; Richardson, Hugh E., Tibet and Its History (Boston: Shambhala Publications, 1984 [1962])Google Scholar; and High Peaks Pure Earth: Collected Writings on Tibetan History and Culture, Aris, Michael, ed. (London: Serindia Publications, 1988)Google Scholar.

17 Stoddard, Heather, Le Mendiant d'Amdo (Paris: Societe d'Ethnographie, 1985)Google Scholar. All quotations are from the unpublished English translation of this book. I thank Heather Stoddard and Tashi Tsering for making it available to me.

18 Patterson, George, Tragic Destiny (London: Faber and Faber, 1959)Google Scholar; Tibet in Revolt (London: Faber and Faber, 1960)Google Scholar; and Patterson of Tibet: Death Throes of a Nation (San Diego: ProMotion Publishing, 1988)Google Scholar.

19 Dhondup, Sampho Tenzing, Mi tshe'i rba rlabs ‘khrugs po (Dehra Dun: Taring House, 1987)Google Scholar.

20 Goldstein, Melvyn C., A History of Modern Tibet, 1913–1951: The Demise of the Lamaist State (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

21 Tashi, Taklha Phuntsok, Mi tshe'i byung ba brjod pa, deb dang po [The episodes of life, book one], Tsering, Tashi, ed. (Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1995)Google Scholar.

22 Williams, Raymond, Marxism and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), 121–27Google Scholar.

23 Gallagher, John and Robinson, Ronald, “The Imperialism of Free Trade,” Economic History Review 6, 1 (1953): 1–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Wolfe, Patrick, “History and Imperialism: A Century of Theory, from Marx to Postcolonialism,” American Historical Review 102, 2 (1997): 388–420, 401Google Scholar.

25 Coronil, Fernando, “Latin American Postcolonial Studies and Global Decolonization,” in Lazarus, Neil, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Postcolonial Literary Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 221–40, 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Stoler, Ann Laura and McGranahan, Carole, “Introduction: Refiguring Imperial Terrain,” in Stoler, Ann Laura, McGranahan, Carole, and Perdue, Peter, eds., Imperial Formations (Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 2007), 3–42 Google Scholar.

27 McGranahan, Carole, “Empire out of Bounds: Tibet in the Era of Decolonization,” in Stoler, Ann Laura, McGranahan, Carole, and Perdue, Peter, eds., Imperial Formations (Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 2007), 173–209 Google Scholar.

28 On the imperial turn, see the collected essays in Burton, Antoinette, ed., After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and through the Nation (Durham: Duke University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Hansen, Peter, “Why Is there no Subaltern Studies for Tibet?” Tibet Journal 28, 4 (2003): 7–22 Google Scholar. See also the Subaltern Studies volumes 1–11 (vols. 1–10, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1982–1999; vol. 11, New York: Columbia University Press, 2000).

30 The two countries have different policies for Tibetans, as well as inconsistent treatment for Tibetans depending on their year of arrival in country. Neither country has a clear, consistent publicly stated policy for Tibetan refugees. In addition, the agreements made in 1959–1960 between His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in India, and between the Dalai Lama and King Mahendra of Nepal, have never been made public.

31 Appadurai, Arjun, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), 37Google Scholar.

32 On the myth of Shangri-la, see Bishop, Peter, The Myth of Shangri-La: Tibet, Travel Writing, and the Western Creation of a Sacred Landscape (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989)Google Scholar; Shakya, Tsering, “The Myth of Shangri-la: Tibet and the Occident,” Lung-ta (1991): 20–23 Google Scholar; Dodin, Thierry and Rather, Heinz, eds., Imagining Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1996)Google Scholar; and Lopez, Donald S. Jr., Prisoners of Shangri-La: Tibetan Buddhism and the West (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar, including the discussion of this book in the Journal of the American Academy of Religion 69, 1 (2001): 163–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 For example, in 2006 the U.S. Congress approved a bill to enable five thousand Tibetan refugees from Nepal to immigrate to the United States. Many of these individuals were without documents of any sort, and the Government of Nepal refused to issue documents to them or to provide exit permits to those who did have documents. As a result the program was stalled, and today these Tibetan refugees remain stuck, spatially incarcerated in Nepal.

34 On Tibet-Chinese relations during the Republican period, see Tuttle, Gray, Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; and, Jagou, Fabienne, “Liu Manqing: A Sino-Tibetan Adventurer and the Origin of a New Sino-Tibetan Dialogue in the 1930s,” Revue d'Etudes Tibétaines 17 (2009): 5–20 Google Scholar.

35 “Dr. Sun Yat-sen's Will,” in San Min Chu I: The Three Principles of the People, Frank W. Price, trans. (Taipei: China Publishing Company, 1975 [1927]), i.

36 Author's interview with George Patterson, San Diego, Jan. 1999.

37 Sampho, Mi tshe'i rba rlabs ‘khrugs po, 55.

38 Stoddard, Le Mendiant d'Amdo, n.p.

39 Kunpel (Kun ‘phel, 1905–1963) is sometimes spelled in translation as “Kumbela,” including the honorific form of address.

40 For Gedun Chophel's biography, see Stoddard, Le Mendiant d'Amdo; and Lopez, Donald S. Jr., The Madman's Middle Way: Reflections on Reality of the Tibetan Monk Gendun Chophel (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

41 On Tibetan trade, see Harris, Tina, Geographical Diversions: Tibetan Trade, Global Transactions (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2013)Google Scholar; Van Spengen, Wim, Tibetan Border Worlds: A Geo-Historical Analysis of Trade and Traders (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar.

42 IOR: L/P+S/12/4211, top secret note, W.A.B. Gardener, Secutrol, Calcutta, 5 Apr. 1946.

43 “Tibetan” rather than “Tibet” appears to be Rapga's preferred English translation of the title, hence, the Tibetan Improvement Party.

44 Cooper, Frederick and Stoler, Ann Laura, eds., Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 McKay, Alex, Tibet and the British Raj: The Frontier Cadre, 1904–1947 (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

46 IOR L/P+S/12/4211, doc. 92.

47 Stoddard, Le Mendiant d'Amdo, n.p.

48 Ibid, n.p.

49 The British category of “Protected Person” did not apply to Tibetans. See Stein, Sarah Abrevaya, “Protected Persons? The Baghdadi Jewish Diaspora, the British State, and the Persistence of Empire,” American Historical Review 116, 1 (2011): 80–108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; On citizenship for Indian colonial subjects, see Banerjee, Sukanya, Becoming Imperial Citizens: Indians in the Late-Victorian Empire (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Ong, Aihwa, Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

51 Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Poddar, Prem, “Passports, Empire, Subjecthood,” in MacPhee, Graham, ed., Empire and After: Englishness in Postcolonial Perspective (New York: Berghahn Books, 2007), 71–86 Google Scholar.

52 IOR L/P+S/12/4211, doc. 41, “Pleader's advice re: my departure from India,” 17 June 1946.

53 Deportation order: IOR L/P+S/12/4211, Joint Secretary to the Government of India letter to the Chinese Commissioner, New Delhi, 4 June 1946. Deportation confirmation: IOR L/P+S/12/4211, express letter from the Government of Bengal Home (Defense) Department to the Secretary of the Government of India in the Home Department, 25 July 1946.

54 I thank Rapga's granddaughters and daughter-in-law for sharing the diary with me, and Tenzin Phuntsok Bhagentsang for translation assistance.

55 Gyatso, Janet, “Counting Crows' Teeth: Tibetans and Their Diaries,” Les habitants du toit du monde (1997): 159–77Google Scholar.

56 McGranahan, Carole, “In Rapga's Library: The Texts and Times of a Rebel Tibetan Intellectual,” Les Cahiers d'Extreme-Asie 15 (2005): 255–76Google Scholar.

57 From Rapga's Explanatory Supplement for the Grammar Book The Light of Speech (Dag yig ngag sgron la). Thank you to Champa Tenzing Lhunpo for helping me translate this text.

58 Ibid., n.p.

59 Patterson, Tibet in Revolt, 60. See also Stoddard, Le Mendiant d'Amdo, n.p., on Shakabpa describing Rapga as a “great patriot.”

60 McGranahan, Carole, “ Sa spang mda’ gnam spang mda: Murder, History, and Social Politics in 1920s Lhasa,” in Epstein, Lawrence, ed., Khams pa Local Histories: Visions of People, Place, and Authority (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 103–26Google Scholar.

61 Taklha Phuntsok Tashi, Mi tshe'i byung ba brjod pa, 212–18.

62 Ibid., 63–67, my translation from the Tibetan.

63 Ibid.

64 Ibid.

65 Ibid.

66 For biographical sketches of Tharchin, see Fader, H. Louis, Called from Obscurity: The Life and Times of a True Son of Tibet, Gergan Dorje Tharchin (Kalimpong: Tibet Mirror Press, 2004)Google Scholar; and, Engelhardt, Isrun, “Tharchin's One Man War with Mao,” in Vitali, Robert, ed., Studies on the History and Literature of Tibet and the Himalaya (Kathmandu: Vajra Publications, 2012), 183–209 Google Scholar.

67 See especially Hugh Richardson's end-of-empire report on Tibet—IOR: MSS EUR D 998/39.

68 Norbu, Dawa, “G. Tharchin: Patriot and Pioneer,” Tibetan Review, Dec. (1975): 18–20 Google Scholar.

69 Stoddard, Le Mendiant d'Amdo, n.p.

70 Patterson, Patterson of Tibet, xiii.

71 Ibid., 25.

72 Patterson, Tragic Destiny, 204.

73 Author's interview with George Patterson, San Diego, Jan. 1999.

74 Patterson, Tibet in Revolt, 59.

75 Author's interview with George Patterson, San Diego, Jan. 1999.

76 Patterson, Tragic Destiny, 40.

77 Diary entry, 2 Feb. 1949.

78 Ibid., 28 Feb 1949.

79 Ibid., 21 Feb. 1949.

80 Ibid., 6 and 8 Apr. 1949.

81 Ibid., 22 May 1949: “Read book about Lenin.” In Rapga's library in Kalimpong is a copy of Problems of Leninism by Stalin.

82 George Patterson recalls Rapga having heated arguments with Chinese Kuomintang members in the streets of Dartsendo during this time. Interview by author, San Diego, Jan. 1999.

83 Diary entry, 11 Oct 1949.

84 Ibid., 4 Jan. 1950.

85 Ibid., 2 Oct. 1950.

86 Author's interview with Robert Ford, London, Feb. 1999.

87 Ibid.

88 On this period, see Ford, Robert, Wind between the Worlds (Berkeley: Snow Lion Graphics, 1987 [1957])Google Scholar; and Bull, Geoffrey, When Iron Gates Yield (Chicago: Moody Press, 1963)Google Scholar.

89 Bull, When Iron Gates Yield, 104.

90 Stoddard, Le Mendiant d'Amdo, n.p.

91 Stoler, Ann Laura, “Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31, 3 (1989): 134–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 153.

92 Richards, Imperial Archive.

93 Personal information from Rapga's family in Kalimpong and from Tashi Tsering, Dharamsala.