Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T08:34:28.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Interpretation of Nature. A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

L. J. Jordanova
Affiliation:
University of Essex

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CSSH Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Another example of the “sentiments” approach is Stone, L.The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500–1800 (London, 1977Google Scholar). There is a critical discussion of this approach in Anderson, M., Approaches to the History of the Western Family 1500–1914, (London, 1980), ch. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Scott, J. W., “The history of the family as an affective unit,” Social History, 4, 509–16 (1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar). Thomas's highly critical review of Stone's book is illuminating; Times Literary Supplement, 21 10 1977, 1226–27Google Scholar.

2 See, for example, Merchant, C., The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution (New York, 1980Google Scholar). Easlea, B., Fathering the Unthinkable: Masculinity, Scientists and the Nuclear Arms Race (London, 1983Google Scholar); Keller, E. Fox, Reflections on Gender and Science (New Haven, 1985Google Scholar); MacCormack, C. P. and Strathem, M., eds., Nature, Culture and Gender (Cambridge, 1980Google Scholar) and Jordanova, L. J., ed., Languages of Nature: Critical Essays on Science and Literature (London, 1986)Google Scholar.