Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T10:43:15.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Runes and Rye: Administration in Denmark and the Emergence of the Younger Futhark, 500–800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2023

Richard Cole*
Affiliation:
History and Classical Studies, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, DK

Abstract

In this article, I take up the case of runic writing to reflect upon James Scott’s view of the nexus between writing and various forms of domination in early states, especially the use of literacy for taxation in cereal-growing societies. Scott’s theses provide interesting matter “to think with,” even when his grasp of historical detail has been found wanting. It is not controversial to grant Scott that cuneiform writing was a remarkable tool for statecraft, and exploitation, in the first states of Mesopotamia, around 3500 BC. The same is true of writing in other early states. But in the first states of Scandinavia, particularly Denmark ca. AD 500–800, writing had a more troubled relationship with the state. No evidence survives that runic writing was used to administer taxation or much else, as it was in other agrarian civilisations. It is true that the runic script was used to commemorate kings, most famously by Haraldr Blátǫnn (r. ca. 958–ca. 986.). But, statistically speaking, it was more often used to aggrandize the sort of local big men who usually resisted centralized power. In this article, I survey the relationship between runic writing and administration. I consider what the Danish situation suggests about the relationship between states and writing and offer a tentative hypothesis of a short-lived attempt at runic bureaucracy around 800, which created—and quickly lost control of—a shortened variety of the runic script (the Younger Futhark).

Type
Origami and the Sides of States
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annales Regni Francorum inde ab a. 741 usque AD a. 829. 1895. Pertz, G. H. and Kurze, Friedrich, eds. Monumenta Germaniae Historica Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum 6. Hannover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Antonsson, Haki. 2020. Viking-Age Scandinavia: Identities, Communities and Kingdoms. In Lindskog, Annika and Stougaard-Nielsen, Jakob, eds., Introduction to Nordic Cultures. London: University College of London Press, 1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arup, Erik. 1961. Danmarks Historie. Vol. 1. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske boghandel.Google Scholar
Bagge, Sverre. 1986. Borgerkrig og statsutvikling i Norge i Middelalderen. Historisk tidsskrift [Norwegian] 65: 145–97.Google Scholar
Bagge, Sverre. 2002. Mellom kildekritikk og historisk antropologi: Olav den hellige, aristokratiet og rikssamlingen. Historisk tidsskrift [Norwegian] 81: 173212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagge, Sverre. 2015. Borgerkrig og statsutvikling—svar til Hans Jacob Orning. Historisk tidsskrift [Norwegian] 94, 91110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 2004. Standardised Fuþarks: A Useful Tool or a Delusion? In Stoklund, Marie, Nielsen, Michael Lerche, Holmberg, Bente, and Fellows-Jensen, Gillian, eds., Runes and Their Secrets. Studies in Runology. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 1130.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P. 2012. Runes: A Handbook. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Barreiro, Santiago. 2010. Santiago Barreiro: Big Men during the Icelandic Commonwealth. MA diss., Háskóli Íslands.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Robert. 2001. Medieval and Modern Concepts of Race and Ethnicity. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 31, 1: 3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkhout, Carl, Parsons, David, and Wilson, David. 1995. Preface to Ray Page, Runes and Runic Inscriptions: Collected Essays on Anglo-Saxon and Viking Runes. Woodbridge: Boydell, ixxi.Google Scholar
Borake, Trine Louise. 2019. No Man Is an Island: Anarchism and Social Complexity in Western Zealand, 550–1350. PhD diss., Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Brink, Stefan. 2008. Lord and Lady—Bryti and Deigja: Some Historical and Etymological Aspects of Family, Patronage and Slavery in Early Scandinavia and Anglo-Saxon England. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.Google Scholar
Brink, Stefan. 2018. Vikingarnas slavar: Den nordiska träldomen under yngre järnålder och äldsta medeltid. Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar
Búalög um verðlag og allskonar venjur í viðskiptum og búskap á Íslandi. 1915–1933. Þorkelsson, Jón, ed. Vol. 1. Reykjavík: Sögufélagið.Google Scholar
Christensen, Aksel E. 1977. Vikingetidens Danmark paa Oldhistorisk Baggrund. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Chronicon Aquitanicum. 1829. Pertz, Georg Heinrich, ed. Monumenta Germaniae Historica 2. Hannover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Chronicon Roskildense et Chronicon Lethrense. 1917. Gertz, M. Cl, ed. Scriptores minores historiae Danicae 1. Copenhagn: Selskabet for Udgivelse af Kilder til Dansk Historie.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T. 2006. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. E. Martin. 1936. The Office of Thyle in Beowulf. Review of English Studies 12, 45: 6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Jacob L. 2012. The Marks of Early Writing. Iran 50: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix. 2004. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Den Jyske Lov. 1941. Skautrup, Peter, ed. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
De Vries, Jan. 2000. Altnordisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Earl Fehr, Dennis. 1993. Dogs Playing Cards: Powerbrokers of Prejudice in Education, Art and Culture. Counterpoints 5. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Edda: Die Lieder des Codex Regius nebst Verwandten Denkmälern. 1983. Neckel, Gustav and Kuhn, Hans, eds. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Engels, Frederick. 1972. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Fischer, Steven Roger. 2001. A History of Writing. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
Foote, Peter and Wilson, David M.. 1979. The Viking Achievement: The Society and Culture of Early Medieval Scandinavia. London: Book Club Associates.Google Scholar
Gazzoli, Laura. 2011. Denemearc, Tanmaurk Ala, and Confinia Nordmannorum: The Annales Regni Francorum and the Origins of Denmark. Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 11: 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guta Lag: The Law of The Gotlanders. 2009. Peel, Christine. ed. and trans. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.Google Scholar
Hansen, Gitte. 2005. Bergen c. 800 to c. 1170: The Emergence of a Town. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedeager, Lotte. 2002. Danernes land: Fra ca. 200 f. Kr til ca. 700 e. Kr. Gyldendal og Politikens Danmarkshistorie. Vol. 2. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Helle, Knut. 2009. Den primitivistiske vendingen i norsk historisk middelalderforskning. Historisk tidsskrift [Norwegian] 88: 571–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, John. 1997. Functions of Literacy and the Use of Runes. In Nyström, Staffan, ed., Runor och ABC: Elva föreläsningar från ett symposium i Stockholm våren 1995. Stockholm: Sällskapet Runica et Mediævalia, 7992.Google Scholar
Ilkjær, Jørgen. 2000. Illerup Ådal: Et arkæologisk tryllespejl. Århus: Moesgaard.Google Scholar
Imer, Lisbeth. 2014. The Danish Runestones—When and Where? Danish Journal of Archaeology 3: 2, 164–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imer, Lisbeth. 2016. Danmarks runesten: En fortælling. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Imer, Lisbeth. 2017. Peasants and Prayers: The Inscriptions of Norse Greenland. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Lis and Moltke, Erik. 1942. Danmarks runeindskrifter. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaards Forlag.Google Scholar
Jansson, Sam Owen. 1981. Runkalendarium. In Karker, Allen, ed., Kulturhistorisk Leksikon for Nordisk Middelalder. Vol. 14. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde og Bagger, 494–96.Google Scholar
Jesch, Judith. 2011. Runic Inscriptions and the Vocabulary of Land, Lordship, and Social Power in the Late Viking Age. In Poulsen, Bjørn and Sindbæk, Søren, eds., Settlement and Lordship in Viking and Early Medieval Scandinavia. Turnhout: Brepols, 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jómsvíkinga saga. 2018. Íslenzk Fornrit 33. Hauksson, Þorleifur and Sigurðsson, Marteinn Helgi, eds. Reykjavík: Hið Íslenzka Fornritafélag.Google Scholar
Kabell, Aage. 1977. Das schwedische Amulett aus Hedeby. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 19, 6469.Google Scholar
Kaestle, Carl F. 1985. The History of Literacy and the History of Readers. Review of Research in Education 12: 1153.Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 2003. Early Runic Consonants and the Origin of the Younger Futhark. NOWELE 43: 7176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroman, Erik. 1982. Taltegn. In Karker, Allen, ed., Kulturhistorisk Leksikon for Nordisk Middelalder. Vol. 18. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde og Bagger.Google Scholar
Liestøl, Aslak. 1971. The Literate Vikings. In Foote, Peter and Strömbäck, Dag, eds., Proceedings of the Sixth Viking Congress. London: Viking Society for Northern Research.Google Scholar
Liestøl, Aslak. 1981. Jartegn. In Karker, Allan, ed., Kulturhistorisk Leksikon for Nordisk Middelalder. Vol. 7. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde og Bagger, 568–69.Google Scholar
Liestøl, Aslak. 1982. Runebrev. In Karker, Allan, ed., Kulturhistorisk Leksikon for Nordisk Middelalder. Vol. 14. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde og Bagger, 459–60.Google Scholar
Liestøl, Aslak, Kerkkonen, Gunvor, and Jansson, Sam Owen. 1981. Karvestokk. In Karker, Allen, ed., Kulturhistorisk Leksikon for Nordisk Middelalder. Vol. 8. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde og Bagger, 322–23.Google Scholar
Looijenga, Tineke. 2003. Texts and Contexts of the Oldest Runic Inscriptions. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, Niels. 1991. ‘Denemearc,’ ‘tanmarkar but’ and ‘tanmaurk ala.’ In Wood, Ian and Lund, Niels, eds., People and Places in Northern Europe 500–1600: Essays in Honour of Peter Hayes Sawyer. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 161–70.Google Scholar
MacGregor, Neil. 2012. A History of the World in 100 Objects. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Moltke, Erik. 1976. Runes and Their Origin: Denmark and Elsewhere. Foote, Peter G., trans. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Must, Gustav. 1957. The Problem of the Inscription on Helmet B of Negau. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 62: 5159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näsman, Ulf. 2006. Danerne og det danske kongeriges opkomst: Om forskningsprogrammet “Fra Stamme til Stat i Danmark.” Kuml [no vol.]: 205–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedoma, Robert. 2002. Helm B. In Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde. Vol. 21. 117–22.Google Scholar
Nordby, K. Jonas. 2013. Ráð þat, If You Can! Futhark 3: 8188.Google Scholar
Norges Gamle Love. 1846. Vol. 1. Keyser, R. and Munch, P. A., eds. Kristiania: Grøndahl.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orning, Hans Jacob. 2014. Borgerkrig og statsutvikling i Norge i middelalderen—en revurdering. Historisk tidsskrift [Norwegian] 93: 193216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östgötalagen. 1895. Freudenthal, A. O., ed. Helsinki: Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
Poole, Russell. 2010a. Þulir as Tradition-Bearers and Prototype Saga-Tellers. In Quinn, Judy and Lethbridge, Emily, eds., Creating the Medieval Saga: Versions, Variability and Editorial Interpretations of Old Norse Saga Literature. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 237–60.Google Scholar
Poole, Russell. 2010b. Þulr.” In Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde. Vol. 30. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 545–46.Google Scholar
Porsmose, Erland. 1988. Middelalder o. 1000–1536. In Bjørn, Claus, Dahlerup, Troels, Jensen, S. P., and Pedersen, Erik Helmer, eds., Det danske landbrugshistorie. Vol. 1. Odense: Landbohistorisk Selskab, 205416.Google Scholar
Postgate, Nicholas. 2013. Bronze Age Bureaucracy: Writing and the Practice of Government in Assyria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Postgate, Nicholas, Wang, Tao, and Wilkinson, Toby. 1995. The Evidence for Early Writing: Utilitarian or Ceremonial? Antiquity 69: 459–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, Bjørn. 2012. Den danske konges indtægter i middelalderen: Haløkonomi, borgøkonomi og skattestat. In Bagge, Sverre, Gelting, Michael H., Hervik, Frode, Lindkvist, Thomas, and Poulsen, Bjørn, eds., Statsutvikling i Skandinavia i middelalderen. Oslo: Dreyers Forlag, 5575.Google Scholar
Poulsen, Bjørn and Sindbæk, Søren. 2011. Settlement and Lordship in Viking and Early Medieval Scandinavia. In Poulsen, Bjørn and Sindbæk, Søren, eds., Settlement and Lordship in Viking and Early Medieval Scandinavia. Turnhout: Brepols, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Neil. 2020. The Children of Ash and Elm: A History of the Vikings. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Randsborg, Klavs. 1980. The Viking Age in Denmark. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Randsborg, Klavs. 1982. Handel, plyndring eller landbrugsekspansion—tre centrale aspekter af vikingetiden. Historisk tidsskrift [Danish] 14: 205–18.Google Scholar
Rimbert. 1884. Vita Anskarii. Waitz, G., ed. MGH Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum 55. Hannover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Robinson, David Earle, Mikkelsen, Peter Hambro, and Malmros, Claus. 2009. Agerbrug, driftsformer og plateressourcer i jernader og vikingetid (500 f. Kr–1100 e. Kr. In Odgaard, Bent and Rømer, Jørgen Rydén, eds., Danske landbrugslandskaber gennem 2000 år: Fra digervoldinger til støtteordninger. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, 117–42.Google Scholar
Roesdahl, Else. 1998. The Vikings. Margeson, Susan M. and Williams, Kirsten, trans. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rose, Jonathan. 2010. The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1963. Poor Man, Rich Man, Big-Man, Chief: Political Types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5, 3, 285303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Peter. 1988. Da Danmark blev Danmark. Fra ca. år 700 til ca. 1050. Marie Hvidt, trans. Danmarkshistorie 3. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Grammaticus, Saxo. 2015. Gesta Danorum. Vol. 2. Friis-Jensen, Karsten, ed., Fisher, Peter, trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2008. Om å skrive språkhistorie ‘nedenfra’: Tanker om en ny norsk språkhistorie for tiden 700–1050. Maal og minne 97, 2: 167–88.Google Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2009. The Scandinavian Runic Reform: A Sound Notion or a Research Dogma? NOWELE 56–57: 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2011. The Rise of the Younger Fuþark: The Invisible Hand of Change. NOWELE 60–61: 4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2015. Runology and Historical Sociolinguistics: On Runic Writing and Its Social History in the First Millennium. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1, 1: 87110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2019. Futhark, älteres und jüngeres. In Sebastian Brather, Wilhelm Heizmann, and Steffen Patzold, eds., Germanische Altertumskunde Online. At https://www.degruyter.com/database/gao/html (last accessed 8 Feb. 2023).Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 2017. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skre, Dagfinn. 2008. The Development of Urbanism in Scandinavia. In Brink, Stefan and Price, Neil, eds., The Viking World. London: Routledge, 8393.Google Scholar
Spurkland, Terje. 2004. Literacy and ‘Runacy’ in Medieval Scandinavia. In Adams, Jonathan and Holman, Katherine, eds., Scandinavia and Europe 800–1350: Contact, Conflict, and Coexistence. Turnhout: Brepols, 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturluson, . 1941. Heimskringla. Vol. 1. Aðalbjarnarson, Bjarni, ed. Íslenzk Fornrit 26. Reykjavík: Hið Íslenzka Fornritafélag.Google Scholar
Stoklund, Marie. 2006a. Chronology and Typology of the Danish Runic Inscriptions. In Stoklund, Marie, Nielsen, Michael Lerche, Holmberg, Bente, and Fellows-Jensen, Gillian, eds., Runes and Their Secrets: Studies in Runology. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 355–84.Google Scholar
Stoklund, Marie. 2006b. Vimose: Runologisch. In Beck, Heinrick, Geuenich, Dieter, and Steuer, Heiko, eds., Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde. Vol. 32. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 410–14.Google Scholar
Svärdström, Elisabeth. 1966. Nyköpingsstaven och de medeltida kalenderrunorna. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Vilh. 1882. L’Alphabet Runiforme Turc. In Samlede Afhandlinger. Vol. 3. Copenhagen: Gyldendaske Boghandel, 2782.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tsitsiklis, Kieran R. M. 2017. Der Thul in Text und Kontext: Þulr/Þyle in Edda und altenglischer Literatur. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tummuscheit, Astrid and Witte, Frauke. 2018. The Danevirke in the Light of Recent Excavations. In Hansen, Jesper and Hansen, Mette, eds., The Fortified Viking Age: 36th Interdisciplinary Viking Symposium. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag, 6974.Google Scholar
Ur, Jason. 2010. Cycles of Civilization in Northern Mesopotamia, 4400–2200 BC. Journal of Archaeological Research 18, 4: 387431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visicato, Guiseppe. 2000. The Power and the Writing: The Early Scribes of Mesopotamia. Bethesda: CDL Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2015. Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society. Waters, Tony and Waters, Dagmar, trans. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wickham, Chris. 2005. Framing the Early Middle Ages: Europe and the Middle Ages, 400–800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worm, Ole. 1626. Computus Runicus. At: https://www.arild-hauge.com/computus_runicus.htm (last accessed 4 May 2021).Google Scholar
Zerzan, John. 2012. Future Primitive Revisited. Port Townsend: Feral House.Google Scholar
Zilmer, Kristel. 2020. Runic Sticks and other Inscribed Objects from Medieval Bergen: Challenges and Possibilities. Maal og Minne 112, 1: 65101.Google Scholar