No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Labanotation and the Study of Human Movement in Anthropology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 September 2015
Abstract
This paper discusses the ways in which Labanotation contributes to the analysis of human movement in anthropology. It is based on the experience of the authors, who, as graduate students in anthropology, were involved in research projects where they used Labanotation for the collection and analysis of data. We argue that the ability of Labanotation to accurately represent body movements and gestures, as well as the spatial relationships between moving agents, makes it useful for analyzing different dimensions of social life as enacted by moving bodies. It also records action from the moving person's point of view, which conforms to the ethnographic practice of taking into account local meanings attached to particular kinds of social action. As such, it can be used at different stages of ethnographic research and for different analytical purposes. To illustrate, we present topically diverse ethnographic projects where Labanotation was used: (1) documentation of the New Year ritual of the Lahu Na Shehleh from Northern Thailand for the purpose of preserving the dance and teaching it to younger members of the community, (2) understanding local meanings of ballet dancing in the Philippines, and (3) identifying tacit learning of social norms among children in Ayacucho, Peru.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Kate Grim-Feinberg and Monica F. A. W. Santos 2015
References
Works Cited
Farnell, Brenda. 1994. “Ethno-Graphics and the Moving Body.” Man
29(4): 929–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnell, Brenda. 1999. “Moving Bodies, Acting Selves.” Annual Review of Anthropology
28: 341–73.Google Scholar
Grim-Feinberg, Kate. 2013. “Cultural Models of Respectful Subjectivity Among Primary School Children in Post-Conflict Ayacucho, Peru: An Embodied Learning Analysis.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Hutchinson Guest, Ann. 2005. Labanotation: The System of Analyzing and Recording Movement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kealiinohomoku, Joann. 1980. “An Anthropologist Looks at Ballet as a Form of Ethnic Dance.” Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement
1(2): 83–97.Google Scholar
Mijares, Clarissa. 2012. “Hidden Mickeys: Reflecting on a Filipino Identity in Movement in Dance.” MA thesis, Ateneo de Manila University.Google Scholar
Miles, Allan. 1976. The Gail Grant Dictionary of Classical Ballet in Labanotation. New York: Dance Notation Bureau.Google Scholar
Ness, Sally. 1997. “Originality in Postcolony: Choreographing the Neoethic Body of Philippine Ballet.” Cultural Anthropology
12(1): 64–108.Google Scholar
Villaruz, Steve. 2006. Treading Through: 45 Years of Philippine Dance. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Drid. 1982. “Semasiology: A Semantic Anthropological View of Human Movements and Actions.” In Semantic Anthropology, edited by Parkin, David, 161–81. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Drid. 1995a. “Space, Intersubjectivity, and the Conceptual Imperative: Three Ethnographic Cases.” In Human Action Signs in Cultural Context: The Visible and the Invisible in Movement and Dance, edited by Farnell, Brenda, 44–81. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Drid. 1995b. “The Missa Major.” Journal for the Anthropological Study of Human Movement
8(2): 1–80.Google Scholar
Williams, Drid. 2003. Signifying Bodies, Signifying Acts: New Ways of Thinking About Human Movement. Manuscript from author.Google Scholar
Wulff, Helena. 2008. “Ethereal Expression: Paradoxes of Ballet as a Global Physical Culture.” Ethnography
9(4): 518–35.Google Scholar