Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:20:11.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brussels and Contemporary Dance: Artistic Labor in a Creative City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2016

Abstract

Within my contribution, I present the research project “Choreographies of Precariousness. A Transdisciplinary Study of the Working and Living Conditions in the Contemporary Dance Scenes of Brussels and Berlin” (supervisors: Katharina Pewny, Rudi Laermans, Christel Stalpaert; UGent and KULeuven; sponsored by FWO). For this conference, I would like to concentrate on the specificity of the contemporary dance profession and to elaborate the landscape of working in Brussels.

Working formats in contemporary dance revolve around internationalization, mobility, transnationalism, and collaboration. Contemporary dance therefore requires an appropriate social security system taking into account the specificity of the profession.

Brussels attracts many foreign dancers, as it offers prominent training possibilities, and hosts several reputable companies and workspaces. Flanders has established a unique social security system for the performing arts professions; however I will elucidate where the system collapses when it comes to contemporary dance. I will demonstrate how dance artists question the working conditions they are confronted within Flanders by analyzing their performances of precaritiousness. Flemish dancer Benjamin Vandewalle uses his piece Co-Productie (2011) to advert to the socio-economic situation, through abruptly stopping his performance in the middle of the piece, clarifying to the audience that he will not continue since the Minister of Culture decided to downsize project subsidies in the middle of the season. He calls for the investment of 2,500 euros by the audience so he can finish the piece. The latter tactic can be seen as one of many ways dance artists are bound to work collaboratively against their precariousness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Annelies Van Assche 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works cited

Ahmed, Sara. 1999. “Home and Away Narratives of Migration and Estrangement.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 2(3): 329347.Google Scholar
Bauer, Eleanor. 2007. “Becoming Room, Becoming Mac: New Artistic Identities in the Transnational Brussels Dance Community.” B-Kronieken. http://www.b-kronieken.be/index.php?type=research_eleanor&lng=nl. Accessed May 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Boon, Ton den, and Geeraerts, Dirk. 2005. Van Dale: Groot Woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal: 3 Dl. (14e dr.). Utrecht, Netherlands: Van Dale Lexicografie.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith P. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendall, S. F.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ellmeier, Andrea. 2003. “Cultural Entrepreneurialism: On the Changing Relationship Between the Arts, Culture and Employment.” The International Journal of Cultural Policy 9(1): 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, Richard. 2004. The Rise of the Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Guerreiro, Angela (curator). 2011. Surviving Dance. Kunst Wirtschaft Politik. [Symposium]. Kampnagel, Hamburg, Germany, May 20–21.Google Scholar
Hesters, Delphine. 2006. “The Facts and Fixions of B-Longing: In Search of a ommunity.” B-Kronieken. http://www.b-kronieken.be/downloads/HESTERS_FACTSANDFIXIONSOFB-LONGING_ENG.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2015.Google Scholar
Janssens, Jan. 2007. Metamorfose in Podiumland: Een Veldanalyse. Brussels: Vlaams Theater Instituut.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, Liz. 2014. VOLCANO. Performance premiere. Kultuurfaktorij Monty, November 21, Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Laermans, Rudi. 2010. “Impure Gestures Towards ‘Choreography in General’: Re/Presenting Flemish Contemporary Dance, 1982–2010.” Contemporary Theatre Review 20(4): 405415.Google Scholar
Lond, Maike. 2013. 10 Journeys to a Place Where Nothing Happens*. Performance premiere. Festival of Ideas “Art and Economy,” November 8, Riga.Google Scholar
Lorey, Isabell. 2006. “Governmentality and Self-Precarization: On the Normalization of Cultural Producers.” MayFly, 187.Google Scholar
Lorey, Isabell. 2010. “Becoming Common: Precarization as Political Constituting.” e-flux. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/becoming-common-precarization-as-political-constituting/. Accessed May 4, 2015.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 2015. “Precarious.” http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/precarious. Accessed February 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Pratt, Andy C. 2008. “Creative Cities: The Cultural Industries and the Creative Class.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 90(2): 107117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambach, Anne, and Rambach, Marine. 2001. Les intellos précaires. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. 2014. A Precariat Charter: From Denizens to Citizens. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Vandewalle, Benjamin. 2011. Co-Productie. Performance premiere: Amperdans, Kultuurfaktorij Monty, October 28, Antwerpen.Google Scholar