Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:38:36.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Choreography: Ideology as Performance in Dance and Everyday Movement, by Andrew Hewitt. 2005. Durham & London: Duke University Press. 254 pp. $79.95 cloth, $22.95paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Mark Franko
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Agamben, Georgio. 1998. Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Heller-Roazen, Daniel. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baxmann, Inge. 2000. Mythos: Gemeinschaft. Körper - und Tanzkulturen in der Moderne. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Burt, Ramsay. 1998. “The Chorus Line and the Efficiency Engineers.” In Alien Bodies: Representations of Modernity, “Race” and Nation in Early Modern Dance, 84100. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crary, Jonathan. 1990. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Debord, Guy. 1994. The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. 1984. “Aesthetic Formalization: Kleist's Uher das Marionettentheater.’ In The Rhetoric of Romanticism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Desmond, Jane, ed. 1997. Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance: Labor, Movement, and Identity in the 1930s. Middle-town, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark, and Richards, Annette, eds. 2000. Acting on the Past: Historical Performance across the Disciplines. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Andrew. 1993. Fascist Modernism: Aesthetics, Politics, and the Avant-Garde. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Andrew. 1996. Political Inversions: Homosexuality, Fascism, and the Modernist Imaginary. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Skiles. 1998. The Politics of Courtly Dancing in Early Modern England. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jelavich, Peter. 1993. Berlin Cabaret. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koritz, Amy. 1995. Gendering Bodies/Performing Art: Dance and Literature in Early-Twentieth-Century Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 2000. “Modern Dance and the American Century.” In A Modern Mosaic. Art and Modernism in the United States. Ed. Ludington, Townsend, 203–26. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McCarren, Felicia M. 1998. Dance Pathologies: Performance, Poetics, Medicine. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zizek, Slavoj. 1999. “Fantasy as a Political Category: A Lacanian Approach.” In The Zizek Reader. Ed. Wright, Elizabeth and Wright, Edmond, 87101. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
zur Lippe, Rudolf. 1979. Naturbeherrschung am Menschen. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Syndikat Reprise.Google Scholar