Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:15:15.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dance and the Political: States of Exception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Mark Franko
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My first idea was to compare Ausdruckstanz literature to work in other fields on the theorization of fascist aesthetics. This would establish a critical framework for the vexed question of the fascistization of German modern dance. As the research of Susan Manning, Marion Kant, and Laure Guilbert has made patently evident, Ausdruckstanz begs the question of dance and politics because of the easy and massive accommodation of German modern dance to the cultural policies of the Third Reich. The history of Ausdruckstanz has long been veiled, but the original research of these scholars persuades us to reconsider dance modernism from the political perspective. An early twentieth-century avant-garde art movement and an authoritarian state apparatus encounter each other at a moment crucial in the development of each; something new is being created, both artistically and politically, that reveals contradictory forces and tendencies at work. Only when these dance scholars lifted the veil and rewrote history could we begin to perceive dance in the full light of the political. They have inaugurated an area of inquiry that requires further work. But any serious critical development of dance study methodology must also be tested against their re-evaluation Ausdruckstanz.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 38 , Issue 1-2 , Summer/Winter 2006 , pp. 3 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ankersmit, F. R. 1996. Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Banes, Sally. 1994. Greenwich Village 1963: Avant-Garde Performance and the Effervescent Body. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Beik, William. 1985. Absolutism and Society in Seventeenth-Century France: State Power and Provincial Authority in Languedoc. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenson, Michael. 2001. Visionaries and Outcasts: The NEA, Congress, and the Place of the Visual Artist in America. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Carlston, Erin G. 1998. Thinking Fascism: Sapphic Modernism and Fascist Modernity. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Edwin. 1942. “Private Lives.” Seattle Washington Times. August 16.Google Scholar
Daly, Ann. 2002. “The Thrill of a Lynch Mob or the Rage of a Woman?” In Critical Gestures: Writings on Dance and Culture, 6–18. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsche, Rosalyn. 1996. “Agoraphobia.” Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges. 1982. Invention de l'hystérie. Charcot et l'iconographie photographique de la Salpetrière. Paris: Macula.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Dominique. 2003. “Ouvertures.” Danse et politique. Démarche artistique et contexte historique. Edited and commented on by Pouillaude, Frédéric. Pantin: Centre national de la danse.Google Scholar
Falasca-Zamponi, Simonetta. 1997. Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini's Italy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, William. 2003. Public forum at the Bamdialogue. New York City. (October 2).Google Scholar
Foster, Susan Leigh. 2003. “Choreographies of Protest.” Theatre Journal (Dance: A Special Issue) 55/3 (October): 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1986. The Dancing Body in Renaissance Choreography (c. 1416–15 89). Birmingham, Ala.: Summa Publications.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1988. “Pour un Nouveau Statut du Baroque en Chorégraphie: l’Effet Puget.” In Image du Corps et Corps Vivant. Actes du Colloque du 22 janvier 1988 de Hyeres, La Seyne-sur-Mer et Toulon, 87–90. Toulon: Ecole des Beaux Arts de Toulon.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1993. Dance as Text: Ideologies of the Baroque Body. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1995. Dancing Modernism/Performing Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 1998. “The King Cross-Dressed: Power and Force in Royal Ballets.” In From the Royal to the Republican Body: Incorporating the Political in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century France. Edited by Melzer, Sara and Norberg, Kate, 64–84. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2001. “Dance and Figurability.” In The Salt of the Earth: On Dance, Politics, and Reality. Edited by de Belder, Steven. Brussels: Flemish Theater Institute.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2002. The Work of Dance: Labor, Movement, and Identity in the 1930s. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2003. “L'utopie antifasciste: American Document de Martha Graham.” In Etre ensemble. Edited by Rousier, Claire, 283–306. Pantin: Centre national de la danse.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. 2007. “Period Plots, Canonical Stages, and Post-Metanarrative in American Modern Dance.” In The Returns of Alwin Nikolais: Bodies, Boundaries, and the Dance Canon. Edited by Martin, Randy and Gitelman, Claudia. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Franko, Mark. ed. 2006. Ritual and Event: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilbert, Laure. 2000. Danser avec le IIIe Reich: les danseurs modernes sous le nazisme. Paris: Éditions Complexe.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1994. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1984. “Periodizing the Sixties.” In The Sixties without Apology. Edited by Sayres, Sohnya, Stephanson, Anders, Aronowitz, Stanley, and Jameson, Fredric. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Alice Yaeger. 1986. Reproductions of Banality: Fascism, Literature, and French Intellectual Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Karina, Lilian, and Kant, Marion. 2003. Hitler's Dancers: German Modern Dance and the Third Reich. Translated by Steinberg, Jonathan. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepecki, André. 1994. “Rethinking Words: A Field Trip in Dance Criticism.” Contact Quarterly 19 (2): 23.Google Scholar
Manning, Susan. 1993. Ecstasy and the Demon: Feminism and Nationalism in the Dances of Mary Wigman. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marin, Louis. 1981. Le portrait du roi. Paris: Minuit, 1988.Google Scholar
Portrait of the King. Translated by Houle, Martha M.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.Google Scholar
McCarren, Felicia. 1998. Dance Pathologies: Performance, Poetics, Medicine. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Margaret M. 1978. L'art du ballet de cour en France (1581–1641). Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1990. Feminist Theory and Simone de Beauvoir. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morris, Mark. 2004. Public forum at the “On Dance” series at Barnard College, New York City. (October 11).Google Scholar
Patraka, Vivian M. 1999. Spectacular Suffering: Theatre, Fascism, and the Holocaust. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pouillaude, Frédéric, ed. 2003. Danse et politique: Démarche artistique et contexte historique. Pantin: Centre national de la danse.Google Scholar
Prevots, Naima. 1998. Dance for Export: Cultural Diplomacy and the Cold War. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Rabant, Claude. 2003. “Le ‘trauma’et les névroses de guerre.” In Danse et politique: Démarche artistique et contexte historique. Edited by Pouillaude, Frédéric. Pantin: Centre national de la danse.Google Scholar
Savigliano, Marta. 1995. Tango: The Political Economy of Passion. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1985. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by Schwab, George. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schnapp, Jeffrey T. 1996. Staging Fascism: 18BL and the Theater of the Masses for Masses. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schnapp, Jeffrey, and Spackmann, Barbara, eds. 1990. Fascism and Culture. Stanford Italian Review 8: 1–2.Google Scholar
Spackman, Barbara. 1996. Fascist Virilities: Rhetoric, Ideology, and Social Fantasy in Italy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Van Orden, Kate. 2005. Music, Discipline, and Arms in Early Modern France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden. 1987. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality.” In The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, 1–25. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1999. “Formalist and Contextualist Strategies in Historical Explanation.” In Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect, 43–75. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Janet. 1997. “Reinstating Corporeality: Feminism and Body Politics.” In Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance. Edited by Jane Desmond, 81–99. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar