Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T20:05:48.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participation Motives in Relation to Background and Involvement Variables Among Finnish Non-Professional Dancers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Pipsa Nieminen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Different dance forms attract different people. Dancers involved in folk dance, ballroom dance, ballet, and modern dance differ in both their background and participation profiles (Nieminen 1997) and in their reasons for participating in dance (Nieminen 1998). In Finland, the 1980s can be considered a golden age in the field of dance education. It was the decade that at long last saw the start of university-level and vocational dance education in the country. At the same time students of physical education were given the opportunity to specialize in dance pedagogy. The new Finnish Opera House in Helsinki also generated a great deal of publicity for dance in general. All this gave impetus to a demand for qualified dance teachers and increased the number of people involved in art dance. Since the 1970s, folk dance has also become more popular than in previous years and today there are many innovative folk dance choreographers who want to see folk dance not only as the transmission of tradition but also as a theater-art form. The latest changes to take place in the field of folk and ballroom dance are partly due to the new four-year program for folk and ballroom dance instructors offered by the Oulu Conservatory of Music.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Fall 1998 , pp. 53 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, B. J. 1997. Why dance students pursue dance: Studies of dance students from 1953 to 1993. Dance Research Journal 29/2: 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, J., Denman, D., and Barron, F. 1972. Dancers write of themselves and dance education. In Artists in the Making, edited by Barron, F., 85–113. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Best, D. 1978. Philosophy and Human Movement. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bisakha, S. 1994. Did Blue Peter save your country? In Kindle the Fire. Proceedings of the 1994 conference of Dance and the Child: International, edited by Schiller, W. and Spurgeon, D., 264–267. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Brodkin, P., and Weiss, M. 1990. Developmental differences in motivation for participating in competitive swimming. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 12/3: 248–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrouser, D. R. 1973. Participation and increase in age of male Indiana University Alumni. Ph.D diss., Indiana University.Google Scholar
Duda, J. 1988. The relationship between goal perspectives, persistence and behavioral intensity among male and female recreational sport participants. Leisure Sciences 10: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duda, J. 1989. Relationship between task and ego orientation and the perceived purpose of sport among high school athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11/3: 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D.L. 1986. Competitiveness among females and males in physical activity classes. Sex Roles 15/56: 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D.L., Gross, J., and Huddleston, S. 1983. Participation motivation in youth sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology 14/1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Gould, D., Feltz, D., and Weiss, M. 1985. Motives for participating in competitive youth swimming. International Journal of Sport Psychology 16/2: 126–140.Google Scholar
Hamburger, M. 1953. Modern dance in Acalanes High School. In “Dance in Education” issue, Impulse, edited by Van Tuyl, M., 23–27. San Francisco: Impulse Publications.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, J. A. 1990. Gender on the sport agenda. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 25/4: 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitmann, H. 1985. Motives of older adults for participating in physical activity programs. In Sports and Aging, edited by McPherson, B., 199–204. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Ingram, A. 1978. Dance and sport. International Review of Sport Sociology 13: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klint, K., and Weiss, M. 1986. Dropping in and dropping out: Participation motives of current and former youth gymnasts. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 11/2: 106–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Korhonen, E. 1996. Suomen Tanssiurheiluliitto ry 20v. SLU-paino.Google Scholar
Lange, R. 1990. Dance folklore and the non-professional dance. Dance Studies 14: 11–35.Google Scholar
Longhurst, K., and Spink, K. 1987. Participation motivation of Australian children involved in organized sport. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences 12/1: 24–30.Google ScholarPubMed
McRobbie, A. 1987. Dance and social fantasy. In Gender and Generation, edited by McRobbie, A. and Nava, M., 130–161. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Messner, M. 1987. The life of the man's seasons: Male identity in the life course of the jock. In Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity, edited by Kimmel, M.London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
Nieminen, P. 1997. Participation profiles and socialisation into dance among non-professional dancers. Sport, Education and Society 2: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, P. (1998). Motives for dancing among Finnish folk dancers, competitive ballroom dancers, ballet dancers and modern dancers. European Journal of Physical Education 3: 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novack, C. J. 1993. Ballet, gender and cultural power. In Dance, Gender and Culture, edited by Thomas, H., 34–48. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, J. 1989. Dance for males: Consideration for separate gender attention. In Young People Dancing: An International Perspective. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Dance and the Child. Vol. 1, 223–227. London: Dance and the Child International.Google Scholar
Reyser, C. P. 1964. The student dancer. In The Arts and Society, edited by Wilson, R. N.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rust, F. 1969. Dance in Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Silvennoinen, M. 1984. Relations between different kinds of physical activity and motive types among Finnish comprehensive and upper secondary school pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Sport Sciences 6/2: 77–82.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, D. 1997. The men's movement. In The Call of Forest and Lakes. Proceedings of the 1997 Conference of Dance and the Child: International, edited by Anttila, E., 8–17. Kuopio, Finland.Google Scholar
Stinson, S. W. 1993. Meaning and value: Reflections on what students say about school. Journal of Curriculum and Supervison 8/3: 216–238.Google Scholar
Stinson, S. W. 1997. A question of fun: Adolescent engagement in dance education. Dance Research Journal 29/2: 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinson, S.W., Blumenfield-Jones, D., and Van Dyke, J. 1990. Voices of young women dance students: An interpretive study of meaning in dance. Dance Research Journal 22/2: 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telama, R., Vuoile, P., and Laakso, L. 1981. Health and physical fitness as motives for physical activity among Finnish urban adults. International Journal of Physical Education 38/1: 11–16.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. 1993. An-other voice: Young women dancing and talking. In Dance, Gender and Culture, edited by Thomas, H., 69–93. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, C. 1992. Dance as recreation: A comparison of college students' perceived values in dancing. Ann Arbor, MI: UMIGoogle Scholar