Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:28:32.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Total Masala Slammer/Heartbreak No. 5: A Case of Mistaken Identity for the Indian Classical Dancer?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Abstract

Total Masala Slammer/Heartbreak no. 5, conceived and directed by Belgian director Michel Laub and visual artist Marina Abramovic, has been described as a European American Indian multimedia theater project combining dance, theater, video projection, art installation, and music. Laub and Abramovic draw on vastly mixed references to deal with themes of race and multiculturalism. A recurrent theme is women and their abuse in different cultural perspectives. Laub and Abramovic are fascinated by two extremes of Indian culture: on the one side the purity of classical Indian dance and art, kathak; on the other, the triviality of soap operas and kitschy TV serials produced by Bollywood (Archa Theatre 2001). Laub's theater is said to play with the conventions of theatrical representation, constantly bringing the rehearsal process onto the stage. Less interested in trained actors than in forceful personalities, Laub looks for a fusion of the autobiographical details of his performers with fictional situations. So, what happens when Michel Laub, a postmodernist with a tendency to parody order, system, and signification, collaborates with Kumudini Lakhia, a traditional reformist for whom art is about poetry, wonder, simplicity, and dignity?

In Total Masala Slammer, unrequited love is “performed” in different performance traditions of kathak and bharatanatyam, Bollywood soap opera, and German theater. Actors, sometimes wearing period costumes, read out excerpts from a book with exaggerated melodrama or affected irreverence. Audition videos are screened, and there is much dancing—contemporary dance, cabaret, kathak, and bharatanatyam. It has a deliberately fragmented piece-by-piece approach with actors seated on stage, taking turns to perform their acts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Theatre, Archa. 2001. www.archatheatre.cz. Accessed on September 1, 2003.Google Scholar
Hebbel Theatre. 2001. www.hebbeltheatre.de. Accessed on September 1, 2003.Google Scholar
Laub, Michel. 2002. Interview by Michael Dwyer on Total Masala Slammer/Heartbreak no: 5, Bollywood Blitz. www.theage.com.au. Accessed on September 1, 2003.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, Chitra. 2001. “Redefining Kathak.” The Hindu, www.hindu.com. Accessed April 20, 2004.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1969. “The Work of Art in an Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations. Edited by Arendt, Hannah, 217252. Reprint, Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bharucha, Rustom. 1995. Chandralekha: Woman, Dance, Resistance. New Delhi: Harper Collins, India.Google Scholar
Bullock, Alan and Trombley, Stephen, 1999. The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought, 3rd ed. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Menon, Sadanand. 2003. “Tripping up on Tradition.” The Hindu. www.theage.com.au. Accessed September 1, 2003.Google Scholar
States, Bert O. 1985. Great Reckonings in Little Rooms; On the Phenomenology of Theatre. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar