Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T12:01:06.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence of gene–environment correlation for peer difficulties: Disruptive behaviors predict early peer relation difficulties in school through genetic effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Michel Boivin ,
Mara Brendgen ,
Frank Vitaro ,
Nadine Forget-Dubois ,
Bei Feng ,
Richard E. Tremblay  and
Ginette Dionne
Michel Boivin*
Affiliation:
UniversitéLaval
Mara Brendgen
Affiliation:
Université du Québec àMontréal
Frank Vitaro
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Nadine Forget-Dubois
Affiliation:
UniversitéLaval
Bei Feng
Affiliation:
UniversitéLaval
Richard E. Tremblay
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal University College Dublin INSERM U669, Paris
Ginette Dionne
Affiliation:
UniversitéLaval
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Michel Boivin, École de Psychologie, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, 2325 rue des Bibliothèques, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; E-mail: michel.boivin@psy.ulaval.ca.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early disruptive behaviors, such as aggressive and hyperactive behaviors, known to be influenced by genetic factors, have been found to predict early school peer relation difficulties, such as peer rejection and victimization. However, there is no consensus regarding the developmental processes underlying this predictive association. Genetically informative designs, such as twin studies, are well suited for investigating the underlying genetic and environmental etiology of this association. The main goal of the present study was to examine the possible establishment of an emerging gene–environment correlation linking disruptive behaviors to peer relationship difficulties during the first years of school. Participants were drawn from an ongoing longitudinal study of twins who were assessed with respect to their social behaviors and their peer relation difficulties in kindergarten and in Grade 1 through peer nominations measures and teacher ratings. As predicted, disruptive behaviors were concurrently and predictively associated with peer relation difficulties. Multivariate analyses of these associations indicate that they were mainly accounted for by genetic factors. These results emphasize the need to adopt an early and persistent prevention framework targeting both the child and the peer context to alleviate the establishment of a negative coercive process and its consequences.

Type
Special Section Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Gene–Environment Correlation in Developmental Psychopathology , February 2013 , pp. 79 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Child Behavior Checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In Macoulides, G. A. & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Arseneault, L., Milne, B. J., Taylor, A., Adams, F., Delgado, K., Caspi, A., et al. (2008). Being bullied as an environmentally mediated contributing factor to children's internalizing problems: A study of twins discordant for victimization. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 162, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arseneault, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Rijsdijk, F. V., Jaffee, S. R., et al. (2003). Strong genetic effects on cross-situational antisocial behavior among 5-year-old children according to mothers, teachers, examiner–observers, and twins' self-reports. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 832–848.Google Scholar
Ball, H. A., Arseneault, L., Taylor, A., Maughan, B., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on victims, bullies and bully-victims in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 104–112.Google Scholar
Barker, E. D., Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., Fontaine, N., Arseneault, L., Vitaro, F., et al. (2008). Predictive validity and early predictors of peer-victimization trajectories in preschool. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 1185–1192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., Girard, A., Pérusse, D., et al. (in press). Strong genetic contribution to peer relationship difficulties at school entry: Findings from a longitudinal twin study. Child Development.Google Scholar
Boivin, M., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1995). Individual–group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups: The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, M., & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experiences and social self-perceptions: A sequential model. Developmental Psychology, 33, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 765–785.Google Scholar
Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2001). Toward a process view of peer rejection and harassment. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 265–289). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Boivin, M., Pérusse, D., Dionne, G., Saysset, V., Zoccolillo, M., Tarabulsy, G. M., et al. (2005). The genetic–environmental etiology of parents' perceptions and self-assessed behaviors toward their 5-month-old infants in a large twin and singleton sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 612–630.Google Scholar
Boivin, M., & Vitaro, F. (1995). The impact of peer relationship on aggression in childhood: Inhibition through coercion or promotion through peer support? In McCord, J. (Ed.), Coercion and punishment in long-term perspectives (pp. 183–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Gagnon, C. (1992). A reassessment of the Self-Perception Profile for Children: Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity of a French version among second through sixth grade children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Poulin, F. (2005). Peer relationships and the development of aggressive behavior in early childhood. In Tremblay, R. E., Hartup, W. W., & Archer, J. (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 376–397): New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315–329.Google Scholar
Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73–87.Google Scholar
Boyle, M. H., Offord, D. R., Racine, Y., Sanford, M., Szatmari, P., & Fleming, J. E. (1993). Evaluation of the 545 original Ontario Child Health Study Scales. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 535–544.Google Scholar
Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Barker, E. D., Vitaro, F., Girard, A., et al. (2011). Gene–environment processes linking aggression, peer victimization, and the teacher–child relationship. Child Development, 82, 2021–2036.Google Scholar
Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Boivin, M., Girard, A., Bukowski, W. M., Dionne, G., et al. (2009). Gene–environment interplay between peer rejection and depressive behavior in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 1009–1017.Google Scholar
Burt, S. A., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). How are parent–child conflict and childhood externalizing symptoms related over time? Results from a genetically informative cross-lagged study. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 145–165.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261–282.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppetelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1983). A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys' groups. Child Development, 54, 1400–1416.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Ku, H. C. (1999). Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 35, 376–385.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., et al. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374–393.Google Scholar
Erhardt, D., & Hinshaw, S. P. (1994). Initial sociometric impressions of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and comparison boys: Predictions from social behaviors and from nonbehavioral variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 833–842.Google Scholar
Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2005). Bullying: Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20, 81–91.Google Scholar
Fernández, J. R., Etzel, C. J., Beasley, M., Shete, S., Amos, C. I., & Allison, D. B. (2002). Improving the power of sib-pair quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection by phenotype winsorization. Human Heredity, 53, 59–67.Google Scholar
Fontaine, N., Carbonneau, R., Barker, E. D., Vitaro, F., Hébert, M., Côté, S. M., et al. (2008). Girls' hyperactivity and physical aggression during childhood predict adjustment problems in early adulthood: A 15-year longitudinal study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 320–328.Google Scholar
Forget-Dubois, N., Pérusse, D., Turecki, G., Girard, A., Billette, J.-M., Rouleau, G., et al. (2003). Diagnosing zygosity in infant twins: Physical similarity, genotyping, and chorionicity. Twin Research, 6, 479–485.Google Scholar
Forsman, M., Lichtenstein, P., Andershed, H., & Larsson, H. (2010). A longitudinal twin study of the direction of effects between psychopathic personality and antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 39–47.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, H. H. (1991). A zygosity questionnaire for young twins: A research note. Behavior Genetics, 21, 257–269.Google Scholar
Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2004). Aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies: Developmental continuity or developmental change? Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 50, 17–38.Google Scholar
Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101.Google Scholar
Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M. J., & Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–1039.Google Scholar
Houndoumadi, A., & Pateraki, L. (2001). Bullying and bullies in Greek elementary schools: Pupils' attitudes and teachers'/parents' awareness. Educational Review, 53, 19–26.Google Scholar
Hoza, B. (2006). Peer functioning in children with ADHD. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijbregts, S. C. J., Séguin, J. R., Zoccolillo, M., Boivin, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Associations of maternal prenatal smoking with early childhood physical aggression, hyperactivity–impulsivity, and their co-occurrence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymel, S., Wagner, E., & Butler, L. J. (1990). Reputational bias: View from the peer group. In Asher, S. R. & Coie, J. D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 156–188). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iervolino, A. C., Pike, A., Manke, B., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences in adolescent peer socialization: Evidence from two genetically sensitive designs. Child Development, 73, 162–174.Google Scholar
Jaffee, S. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Polo-Tomas, M., Price, T. S., & Taylor, A. (2004). The limits of child effects: Evidence for genetically mediated child effects on corporal punishment but not on physical maltreatment. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1047–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffee, S. R., & Price, T. S. (2007). Gene–environment correlations: A review of the evidence and implications for prevention of mental illness. Molecular Psychiatry, 12, 432–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112, 1231–1237.Google Scholar
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and school functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349–359.Google Scholar
Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment? Child Development, 67, 1305–1317.Google Scholar
Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Perusse, D. (2007). Do friends' characteristics moderate the prospective links between peer victimization and reactive and proactive aggression? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 665–680.Google Scholar
Lamarche, V., Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Perusse, D., & Dionne, G. (2006). Do friendships and sibling relationships provide protection against peer victimization in a similar way? Social Development, 15, 373–393.Google Scholar
Larsson, H., Viding, E., Rijsdijk, F. V., & Plomin, R. (2008). Relationships between parental negativity and childhood antisocial behavior over time: A bidirectional effects model in a longitudinal genetically informative design. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 633–645.Google Scholar
Leblanc, N., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Tremblay, R., & Pérusse, D. (2008). The development of hyperactive/impulsive behaviors during the preschool years: The predictive validity of parental assessments. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 977–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. L. L., Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M. A., & Plomin, R. (2011). The etiology of mathematical self-evaluation and mathematics achievement: Understanding the relationship using a cross-lagged twin study from ages 9 to 12. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 710–718.Google Scholar
McGuire, S., Manke, B., Saudino, K. J., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. (1999). Perceived competence and self-worth during adolescence: A longitudinal behavioral genetic study. Child Development, 70, 1283–1296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1992). Genetic influence on risk of divorce. Psychological Science, 3, 368–373.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2009). MPlus 5.2. Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (1999). Trajectories of boys' physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 70, 1181–1196.Google Scholar
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.Google Scholar
O'Connor, T. G., Jenkins, J. M., Hewitt, J., DeFries, J. C., & Plomin, R. (2001). Longitudinal connections between parenting and peer relationships in adoptive and biological families. In Deater-Deckard, K. & Petrill, S. A. (Eds.), Gene–environment processes in social behaviors and relationships. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 100–125): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In Gadow, K. D. & Bialer, I. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 365–436). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). An empirical comparison of sampling aggression and victimization in school settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 360–366.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814.Google Scholar
Petitclerc, A., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Zoccolillo, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2009). Disregard for rules: The early development and predictors of a specific dimension of disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 1477–1484.Google Scholar
Pike, A., & Atzaba-Poria, N. (2003). Do sibling and friend relationships share the same temperamental origins? A twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 44, 598–611.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1991). The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on “environmental” measures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 373–427.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Loehlin, J. C. (1977). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322.Google Scholar
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–196.Google Scholar
Rhee, S., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 490–529.Google Scholar
Rigby, K. (1999) Peer victimisation at school and the health of secondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 95–104.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Eisenberg, N. & Damon, W. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 571–645): Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258.Google Scholar
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype–environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.Google Scholar
Shete, S., Beasley, T. M., Etzel, C. J., Fernandez, J. R., Chen, J., Allison, D. B., et al. (2004). Effect of windorization on power and type 1 error of variance components and related methods of QTL detection. Behavior Genetics, 34, 153–159.Google Scholar
Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–268.Google Scholar
Spotts, E. L., Neiderhiser, J. M., Towers, H., Hansson, K., Lichtenstein, P., Cederblad, M., et al. (2004). Genetic and environmental influences on marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 107–119.Google Scholar
Tremblay, R. E., Loeber, R., Gagnon, C., Charlebois, P., Larivée, S., & LeBlanc, M. (1991). Disruptive boys with stable and unstable high fighting behavior patterns during junior elementary school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 285–300.Google Scholar
Van den Oord, E. J. C. G., Boomsma, D. I., Verhulst, F. C., (2000). A study of genetic and environmental effects on the co-occurrence of problem behaviors in three-year-old-twins. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 360–372.Google Scholar
van Lier, P., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Perusse, D., Koot, H., et al. (2007). Kindergarten children's genetic vulnerabilities interact with friends' aggression to promote physical aggression. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 1080–1087.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. R. (2005). Winsorized robust measures. In Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 219–281): Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wright, J. C., Gianmarino, M., & Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: Individual–group similarity and the social “misfit.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523–536.Google Scholar