Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:26:20.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interobserver reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms in children with newly diagnosed seizures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2006

Hans Stroink
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Robbert-Jan Schimsheimer
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Al W de Weerd
Affiliation:
Dutch Epilepsy Clinics Foundation (SEIN), Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Ada T Geerts
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Neurology, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Willem F Arts
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Neurology, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Els A Peeters
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Oebele F Brouwer
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Medical Centre, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A Boudewijn Peters
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Neurology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cees A van Donselaar
Affiliation:
Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Get access

Abstract

The reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms (EEG) is of great importance in assessing the value of this diagnostic tool. We prospectively obtained 50 standard EEGs and 61 EEGs after partial sleep deprivation from 93 children (56 males, 37 females) with a mean age of 6 years 10 months (SE 5mo; range 4mo–15y 7mo) with one or more newly diagnosed, unprovoked seizures. Two clinical neurophysiologists independently classified the background pattern and the presence of epileptiform discharges or focal non-epileptiform abnormalities of each EEG. The agreement was substantial for the interpretation of the EEG as normal or abnormal (kappa 0.66), almost perfect for the presence of epileptiform discharges (kappa 0.83), substantial for the occurrence of an abnormal background pattern (kappa 0.73), and moderate for the presence of focal non-epileptiform discharges (kappa 0.54). In conclusion, the reliability of the visual interpretation of EEGs in children is almost perfect as regards the presence of epileptiform abnormalities, and moderate to substantial for the presence of other abnormalities.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2006 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)