Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T02:18:55.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary validation of an observational checklist for persons with cognitive impairments and inability to communicate verbally

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2000

Lynn M Breau
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Patrick J McGrath
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Biomechanical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Carol Camfield
Affiliation:
Division of Child Neurology, IWK Grace Health Centre for Children, Women, and Families, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Christina Rosmus
Affiliation:
Paediatric Pain Service, IWK Grace Health Centre for Children, Women, and Families, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
G Allen Finley
Affiliation:
Departments of Anaesthesia and Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada.
Get access

Abstract

To obtain a preliminary validation of the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist for individuals with inability to communicate verbally, 32 caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairments aged 3 to 44 years retrospectively completed the Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist and rated item usefulness (0 to 10). In the second part of the study 33 caregivers completed the checklist after two painful (e.g. burns, falls, surgery), one distressful (e.g. unwanted grooming, feared animal/noise), and one calm event (e.g. watching television). Checklist scores did not correlate with the age, sex, or physical limitations of individuals with inability to communicate verbally. In the first part of the study Cronbach's alpha was 0.66; all mean usefulness ratings exceeded 5 out of 10. In the second part of the study after four items were removed, Cronbach's alpha was 0.79. Checklist scores during pain correlated with numerical ratings of pain intensity, did not differ between the two pain events, and differed significantly from calm scores. Differences in Checklist scores during pain and distress were found for two subscales. The checklist exhibits internal consistency, and preliminary evidence suggests it can detect pain and is reliable over time.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2000 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)