Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T01:27:25.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authenticity and the Limits of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

LAUREN BIALYSTOK
LAUREN BIALYSTOK*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Almost everyone has had an intuitive experience of authenticity that seems to reveal a glimmer of one’s true identity. Yet by positing the existence of a ‘true self,’ authenticity introduces metaphysical challenges that resist systematic solutions. I argue that authenticity properly analyzed demands an essentialist structure that strains to be applied to personal identity. I then assess the three most influential types of accounts in modern philosophical discussions against this framework: Romanticism and autonomy; late existentialism; and virtue conceptions of authenticity. This analysis casts doubt on the possibility of generating a complete philosophical account of authenticity.

À peu près tout le monde a déjà fait l’expérience intuitive de l’authenticité, d’un moment qui semble révéler une lueur de sa véritable identité. Pourtant, en posant l’existence d’un «vrai moi», l’idée d’authenticité pose des défis métaphysiques qui mettent en lumière les complexités de l’individualité. J’avance que pour être bien examinée, l’authenticité exige une structure essentialiste qui tend à s’appliquer à l’identité personnelle. J’examine ensuite les trois types d’approches les plus influents dans les discussions philosophiques modernes contre cette position : le romantisme et ses héritiers contemporains, l’existentialisme tardif et les conceptions de la vertu. Cette analyse met en doute la possibilité de générer une conception philosophique complète de l’authenticité.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 271 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berman, Marshall 1970 The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Lauren 2013“Authenticity and Trans Identity.” In Let’s Talk About Sex: A Multidisciplinary Discussion. Ed. Stewart, Scott. Sydney, Nova Scotia: Cape Breton University Press, 122–145.Google Scholar
Bialystok, Lauren 2011“Refuting Polonius: Sincerity, Authenticity, and Shtick.” Philosophical Papers 40.2 (July 2011): 207–231.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John 2010“Integrity and Fragmentation.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1): 2–14.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald 1988 The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry 1988“Identity and Wholeheartedness.” In The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, Michael 2013“Taking the Self out of Self-Rule.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1): 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guignon, Charles 2004 On Being Authentic. Canada: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles 2008“Authenticity.” Philosophy Compass 3 (2): 277–290.Google Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque 1997“Liberating Constraints.” Journal of Philosophical Research 22: 261–287.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1996 Being and Time. Trans. Stambaugh, Joan. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1927 Sein und Zeit. Achtzehnte Auflage (2001). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried 1957 Werke. Ed. Dobbek, Wilhelm. Weimar: Volksverlag.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2008 Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 1995 The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1974 The Gay Science. Trans. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1896 Thus Spake Zarathustra. Trans. Tille, Alexander. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek 1984 Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Potter, Andrew 2010 The Authenticity Hoax: How We Got Lost Finding Ourselves. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 2006 Autobiographical, Scientific, Religious, Moral, and Literary Writings. Trans. Kelly, Christopher. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 2000 Confessions. Trans. Scholar, Angela. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1979 Émile. Trans. Bloom, Allan. United States: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1984 The War Diaries. Trans. Hoare, Q.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1984 Being and Nothingness. 1943. Trans. Barnes, Hazel. New York: Washington Square.Sartre, Jean-Paul1970 Existentialism and Humanism. Trans. P. Mairet. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold 2005 The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean 1988 Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. Trans. Goldhammer, A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1989 Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1991 Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel 1972 Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Varga, Somogy 2012 Authenticity as an Ethical Ideal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Velleman, David 2006“Identification and Identity.” In Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 2002 Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar