No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Immorality and Self-Deception: A Reply to Béla Szabados
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Discussion/Note
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 274 - 280
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1977
References
1 Dialogue, XIII, 1, March 1974, p. 25.
2 Most important are: “Upon the Character of Balaam”, “Upon Self-Deceit”, and the third of the Six Sermons, in The Works of Joseph Butler, edited by W.E. Gladstone (Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1896), Vol. II. In the first half of this essay page references in parentheses are to this textGoogle Scholar.
3 Szabados. p. 25.
4 Ibid., pp. 26–27.
5 Ibid., p. 27.
6 Ibid., p. 28.
7 Ibid.
8 From this point on, page references in parentheses will be to: Fingarette, Herbert, Self-Deception (New York: Humanities Press, 1969)Google Scholar.
9 Szabados, pp. 28–29.
10 Ibid., p. 30.
11 Ibid., p. 29.
12 With slight modifications, John King-Farlow's counterexamples given n i his review of Fingarette's book seem to me valid (Metaphilosophy, IV, 1, January 1973. pp. 82–83).
13 Szabados. p. 34.
14 Cratylus, 428d.
15 The Doctrine of Virtue, translated by Gregor, Mary J. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1964), pp. 92–93Google Scholar.
16 “The Ethics of Belief”, Lectures and Essays, edited by Stephen, Leslie, Pollock, Frederick (London: Macmillan, 1879), Vol. II, p. 186Google Scholar.
17 The Principles of Art (New York: Oxford University Press, 1958), p. 220Google Scholar.