No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence: A Reply to Botterell
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2010
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0012217300013652/resource/name/firstPage-S0012217300013652a.jpg)
- Type
- Interventions/Discussions
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 163 - 168
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002
References
Antony, L. 1989 “Anomalous Monism and the Problem of Explanatory Force.” Philosophical Review, 98: 153–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilodeau, R. 1993 “L'Inertie du Mental.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 32: 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botterell, A. 2002 "“Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence: A Reply to Campbell.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 41, 1: 155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. 1997 “The Standard Objection to Anomalous Monism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 73, 3: 373–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. 1998 “Anomalous Monism and the Charge of Epiphenomenalism.” Dialectica, 52, 1:23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. 2000 “Supervenience and Psycho-Physical Dependence.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review, 39: 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1970 “Mental Events.” In Experience and Theory. Edited by Foster, L. and Swanson, J.. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1987 “‘Strong’ and ‘Global’ Supervenience Revisited.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48: 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1990 “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.” Metaphilosophy, 21: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1993a “Can Supervenience and ‘Non-Strict Laws’ Save Anomalous Monism?” In Mental Causation. Edited by Heil, J. and Mele, A.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1993b “Concepts of Supervenience.” In Supervenience and Mind. Edited by Kim, J.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klagge, J. 1990 “Davidson's Troubles with Supervenience.” Synthese, 85: 339–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoutland, F. 1980 “Oblique Causation and Reasons for Action.”Synthese, 43: 351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoutland, F. 1985 “Davidson on Intentional Behavior.” In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Edited by Lepore, E. and McLaughlin, B.. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar