Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:37:08.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Humanities: Their Value, Defence, Crisis, and Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Zhang Longxi*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
*
Zhang Longxi, City University of Hong Kong, Department of Chinese, Translation and Linguistics, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China Email: ctlxzh@cityu.edu.hk

Abstract

The humanities, particularly literature and the arts, seem always to have to justify their value and legitimacy vis-à-vis some other, more practical, more useful, or more authoritative aspects of human life and activities. In ancient Greece, Plato dismissed poetry as being untrue and irrational, but beginning with Aristotle, there has been a long tradition of defense of poetry in the West. Traditionally the most effective defense was to emphasize the moral values the humanities can teach and the exemplary significance of the classics. In the late nineteenth century, science began to challenge the value of the humanities, and in the twentieth century, that resulted in the “two cultures” debate in the 1960s. In more recent time, however, a real crisis of the humanities arises not from challenges from the outside but from within, as scholars in the humanities—particularly in literary and cultural studies—question the basic values of the humanities and “decanonize” the classics. The utilitarian tendency of modern society makes it difficult for the humanities to prove their practical use and worth. To argue for the value of the humanities, therefore, it is very important to refuse the utilitarian terms of debate, to reclaim the values of the humanities, and to re-emphasize the exemplary significance of the classic in order to work toward a better future not only of the humanities, but of our world at large.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle (1987) “Poetics” with the “Tractatus Coislinianus”, reconstruction of “Poetics II”, and the fragments of the “On Poets”, trans. Janko, R. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cohen, Patricia (2009) “In Tough Times, Humanities must Justify their Worth,” The New York Times, February 25.Google Scholar
Damrosch, David (2003) What is World Literature? Princeton: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J (1982) Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, A. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eco, U (2002) On Literature. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1977) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. Bouchard, D F, Simon, S. Ithaca: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H-G (1989) Truth and Method, 2nd revised ed., trans. revised by Weinsheimer, J, Marshall, D G. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen (1989) “Aristotle's Poetics,” in Kennedy, G A (ed.) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, t. 1, pp. 149183. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank (2000) Shakespeare's Language. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank (2004) Pleasure and Change: The Aesthetics of Canon. New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Kernan, Alvin, ed. (1997) What Happened to the Humanities? Princeton: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Clark (1994) Troubled Times for American Higher Education: The 1990s and Beyond. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Leavis, F R (1963) Two Cultures? The Significance of C. P. Snow. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Liu, Baonan (1957) 論語正義. Beijing: 中華書局.Google ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, Geoffrey E R (2004) Ancient Worlds, Modern Reflections: Philosophical Perspectives on Greek and Chinese Science and Culture. Oxford: Oxford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J-F (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, G, Massumi, B. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1997) Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
Plato (1963). The Collected Dialogues, including the Letters, eds Hamilton, E, Cairns, H. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, C-A (1900) “What Is a Classic?”, in Essays by Sainte-Beuve, , trans. E Lee, pp. 112. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip (1970) An Apology for Poetry, ed. F G Robinson. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Snow, Charles Percy (1998) The Two Cultures. Cambridge UK: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel (2000) The Moral Obligation to Be Intelligent: Selected Essays. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
Warehime, Nancy (1993) To Be One of Us: Cultural Conflict, Creative Democracy, and Education. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Zuo, Qiuming, et al. (1999) 春秋左傳正義. Beijing: 北京大學出版社.Google ScholarPubMed