Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:29:55.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Italian Elite Groups at Work: A View from the Urban Grassroots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Italo Pardo
Italo Pardo*
Affiliation:
University of Kent, UK
*
Italo Pardo, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, England, CT2 7NZ, UK. Email: i.pardo@kent.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Western élite groups’ moralities and actions can and should be studied empirically. Contrary to belief held in the 1980s in mainstream social anthropology that fieldwork in the classic anthropological fashion could not be done among the western élite, the findings of long-term research in this field have yielded key ethnographic insights leading to academic and public debate. In this article I draw on ethnographic research on legitimacy, power, and governance among key Neapolitan élite groups to offer reflections on a style of governance that has at once engendered and thrived on the blurring of the dividing line between what is legitimate and what is not legitimate in public life. The discussion focuses on powerful, tightly networked groups that, inspired by an elitist philosophy of power, have been hard at work to gain and maintain power, while losing trust and authority. The analysis builds towards an understanding of their implosion and of the corresponding erosion of the relationship between citizenship and governance.

Keywords

ethnographic study of élite groupspowertrustauthoritygovernancedisciplinary prejudice
Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 63 , Issue 3-4: Urban Anthropology , August 2016 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaturo, E, ed. (2003) Capitale sociale e classi dirigenti a Napoli. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Beetham, D (1987) Bureaucracy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P (1993) La Misère du monde. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M, Rees, AM, eds (1996) Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Camera dei Deputati (1998) Indagine conoscitiva sul sistema creditizio nel Mezzogiorno. Roma: Camera dei Deputati.Google Scholar
Chiariello, P (2008) Monnezzopoli: la grande truffa. Napoli: Tullio Pironti.Google Scholar
Confcommercio (2011) Osservatorio sul credito nel ii trimestre 2011. Roma: Confcommercio.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R (1996) Citizenship and social class. In: Bulmer, M, Rees, AM (eds) Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall. London: University College London Press, pp. 25–48.Google Scholar
Della Corte, M (2007) Bassolino: amici e compagni. Napoli: Controcorrente.Google Scholar
Demarco, M (2007) L’altra metà della storia: spunti e riflessioni su Napoli da Lauro a Bassolino. Napoli: Guida.Google Scholar
De Vivo, P (2006) Ricominciare: il Mezzogiorno, le politiche, lo sviluppo. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Di Feo, G (2008) Compagni spa, L’Espresso, 49: 58–66.Google Scholar
Fuller, LL (1964) The Rationality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hann, C (1996) Introduction: political society and civil anthropology. In: Hann, C, Dunn, E (eds) Civil Society: Challenging Western Models. London: Routledge, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, M (1992) The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Hyland, JL (1995) Democratic Theory: The Philosophical Foundations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Iovene, B, Lombardi, N (2008) Campania infelix. Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Lively, J (1975) Democracy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Marshall, TH (1950) Citizenship, Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Montefusco, G (1997) Un miracolo italiano. Napoli 1993–1997: Dal dissesto finanziario ai b.o.c. Napoli: Il Denaro.Google Scholar
Moore, SF (1978) Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (1993) Socialist visions, Naples, and the Neapolitans: value, control, and representation in the agency/structure relationship, Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 1: 77–92.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (1995) Morals of legitimacy in Naples: streetwise about legality, semi-legality, and crime, European J. of Sociology, 36(1): 44–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, I (1996) Managing Existence in Naples: Morality, Action and Structure. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, I (2000a) Credit, entrepreneurship and the repayment of debt: mismatched conceptions of legitimacy in Italy”, Self, Agency and Society, 2(2): 51–87.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (2000b) When power lacks legitimacy: relations of politics and law to society in Italy. In: Pardo, I (ed.) Morals of Legitimacy: Between Agency and System. Oxford: Berghahn Books. pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (2001) Elite senza fiducia: ideologie, etiche di potere, legittimità. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (2004) Where it hurts: an Italian case of graded and stratified corruption. In: Pardo, I (ed.) Between Morality and the Law: Corruption, Anthropology and Comparative Societies. Farnham: Ashgate (now published by Routledge), pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (2010) Italian rubbish: elemental issues of citizenship and governance. In: Pardo, I, Prato, GB (eds) Citizenship and the Legitimacy of Governance. Farnham: Ashgate (now published by Routledge), pp. 25–45.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (2012a) Exercising power without authority: powerful elite implode in urban Italy. In: Pardo, I, Prato, GB (eds) Anthropology in the City: Methodology and Theory, Farnham: Ashgate (now published by Routledge), pp. 53–78.Google Scholar
Pardo, I (2012b) Entrepreneurialism in Naples: formality and informality, Urbanities, 2(1): 30–45, www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com/journal2/index.html.Google Scholar
Pardo, I, Prato, GB (2010) Introduction: disconnected governance and the crisis of legitimacy. In: Pardo, I, Prato, GB (eds) Citizenship and the Legitimacy of Governance. Farnham: Ashgate (now published by Routledge), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Pardo, I, Prato, GB, eds (2010) Citizenship and the Legitimacy of Governance. Farnham: Ashgate (now published by Routledge).Google Scholar
Parry, G (1969) Political Elites. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Pitch, T (1983) Sociology of law in Italy, Journal of Law and Society, 10(1): 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prato, GB (1993) Political decision making: environmentalism, ethics and popular participation in Italy. In: Milton, K (ed.) Environmentalism: A View from Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prato, GB (2000) The cherries of the mayor: degrees of morality and responsibility in local Italian administration. In: Pardo, I (ed.) Morals of Legitimacy: Between Agency and System. Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 57–82.Google Scholar
Prato, GB, ed. (2009) Beyond Multiculturalism: Views from Anthropology. Farnham: Ashgate (now published by Routledge).Google Scholar
Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Napoli (2008) Interventi di contrasto giudiziario nel settore dello smaltimento illecito dei rifiuti. Napoli: Procura della Repubblica.Google Scholar
Rees, AM (1996) T. H. Marshall and the progress of citizenship. In: Bulmer, M, Rees, AM (eds) Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall. London: University College London Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Ruffo, A (1998) Giornali e potere: esercizio della responsabilità e costruzione della credibilità, Il Denaro, 48.Google Scholar
Ruffo, A (2011) After the Murdoch affair: a better ethics?, Urbanities, 1(1): 60–65, www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com.Google Scholar
Salin, E (1949) Usury. In: Seligman, ERA (ed.) Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. xv, pp. 193–197. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Saltman, M (1985) ‘The Law is an Ass’: an anthropological appraisal. In: Overing, J (ed.) Reason and Morality. London: Tavistock, pp. 226–239.Google Scholar
Senato della Repubblica (2007) Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sul ciclo dei rifiuti e sulle attività illecite ad esso connesse. Roma: Tipografia del Senato.Google Scholar
Smith, BC (1987) Bureaucracy and Political Power. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Stanckiewicz, WJ (1980) Approaches to Democracy: Philosophy of Government at the Close of the Twentieth Century. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Starr, J, Collier, JF, eds (1989) History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stella, G (2001) Lo Spreco. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
svimez (Associazione per lo sviluppo dell’industria nel Mezzogiorno) (2010) Rapporto sull’economia del Mezzogiorno. Roma: Failli Grafica.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1974) Politics as a vocation [1919], in Gerth, HH, Wright Mills, C (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 77–128.Google Scholar