Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T06:23:13.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tackling “conspiracy” theories after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Emmanuel Kreis*
Affiliation:
Groupe sociétés, religions, laïcités (UMR 8582 CNRS-EPHE), Paris, France
*
Emmanuel Kreis, Groupe sociétés, religions, laïcités (UMR 8582 CNRS-EPHE), Paris, France. Email: emma.kreis@laposte.net

Abstract

The terrorist attack against the satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo and the subsequent hostage-taking in the kosher supermarket in Paris on the 7th and 9th January 2015 profoundly shocked the French public. The term ‘conspiracy theory’ very rapidly came to be used in the media to account for accusations of a ‘false flag operation’ and for the circulation of doubts concerning certain details relating to these events. The use of the term ‘conspiracy theory’ in these contexts seemed to show up an extremely broad application of it, an application, which, in some cases, was accompanied by a rather impassioned approach to the events and one not always free from ideological presuppositions which aligned phenomena which, even though linkages between them could be shown, should more properly be distinguished one from another.

This article proposes to examine the media and institutional applications of this term during the episode of the ‘anti-conspiracy theory panic’, which followed upon the Paris incidents. This study will permit the very notion of ‘conspiracy theory’ to be brought into question, both on the level of definition and from a heuristic perspective.

Type
Theoretical approaches
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sources

The Cause of World Unrest (1920). New York/London: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Carr, William Guy (1958) Pawns in the Game. Willowdale, ON: National Federation of Christian Laymen.Google Scholar
Carr, William Guy (1966) Satan, Prince of this World. Palmdale, CA: Omni Publications.Google Scholar
Caro, Rodríguez, María, José (1923) El Misterio de la Masonería. Buenos Aires: Editorial difusión.Google Scholar
Cherep-Spiridovich, Arthur (1926) The Secret World Government or the Hidden Hand: The Unrevealed in History. New York: The Anti-Bolshevist Publishing Association.Google Scholar
Docteur Bataille (1892-1895) Le Diable au XIXe siècle. Paris: Delhomme et Briguet.Google Scholar
Griffin, Des (1980) Descent Into Slavery? South Pasadena: Emissary Publications.Google Scholar
Lombard, Jean (1984) La Face cachée de l’Histoire moderne. Madrid: s.n.Google Scholar
Margiotta, Domenico (1895) Le Palladisme: culte de Satan-Lucifer dans les triangles maçonniques. Grenoble: H. Falque.Google Scholar

References

Bratich, JZ (2008) Conspiracy Panics, Political Rationality and Popular Culture. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
deHaven-Smith, L (2013) Conspiracy Theory in America. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, C (2005) The cause of world unrest. In: Richard, SL (ed.) Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution. Santa Barbara/Denver/Oxford: ABC-CLIO, pp. 108109.Google Scholar
Knight, P (2012) Plotting future directions in conspiracy theory research. In: Butter, M, Reinkowski, M (eds) Conspiracy Theories in the Middle East and the United States. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 346370.Google Scholar
Kreis, E (2009) Les Puissances de l’ombre. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
van Prooijen, JW, Krouwel, APM, Pollet, T (2015) Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 6(5): 570578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar