Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:29:00.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fetish of Art in the Twentieth Century

The Case of the Mona Lisa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Hans Belting
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The old idea of the masterpiece, the bane of artists throughout the century that is now drawing to a close, is barely recognizable any more. For the general public, this idea remains a facile cliché that is always ready when needed to put an end to a serious discourse on art. Only the label, not the idea itself, was left when artists came to the point of holding masterpieces responsible for the tenacious survival of outdated artistic ideals. The idea of perfected art has become so far removed from the object of its incarnation that we have long been forced to seek the masterpiece by other names. On the other hand, the term masterpiece lends itself to cut-rate uses in which the Utopian content is but a dim gleam. The avantgarde, in search of a scapegoat, decries favored artistic objects as false idols or as fetishes of art. The Mona Lisa, which did not achieve the status of a universal idol until the nineteenth century, thus became the prime target of ill humor: was it not the very epitome of society's trivialization (and mystification) of art?

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 46 , Issue 183 , September 1998 , pp. 83 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Theft: On this point, see Reit, S. V., The Day They Stole the Mona Lisa, New York, 1981; M. Esterow, Mit Mona Lisa leben. Die grossen Kunstdiebstähle unserer Zeit, Hamburg, 1967, pp. 167 ff. On the futurists' manifesto, see in E. Crispolti, La macchina mito futurista, Rome, 1986 (appendix). On A. Salmon's text, see R. Fry, Der Kubismus, Cologne, 1966, pp. 88 ff; E. Lipton, Picasso Criticism, London, 1976, p. 80. Apollinaire too wrote about the theft: see H. Düchting (ed.), Apollinaire, Cologne, 1990, p. 125, p. 331. On art historians, see R. Longhi, “Le Due Lisa,” in La Voce, vol. VI, 1914, no. 1; H. Focillon, “La Joconde et ses interprètes,” in Technique et sentiment, Paris, 1932, pp. 78 ff.Google Scholar
Kafka at the Cinema: On Max Brod and Franz Kafka's visit to Paris, and on the film that they saw, see Zischler, H., Kafka geht ins Kino, Hamburg, 1996, pp. 86 ff (on the film), p. 58 (on the taxi ride through Munich), p. 40 (the panorama), p. 68 (Paris), p. 73 (film and journal). On the publication of the journals, see M. Brod / F. Kafka, Eine Freundschaft, vol. I, Reiseaufzeichnungen, Frankfurt-am-Main, 1987; F. Kafka, Resisetagebücher in der Fassung der Handschrift, Frankfurt-am-Main, 1994. On silent film, see S. Kracauer, Kino, Frankfurt-am-Main, 1974, pp. 16 ff. (written in 1951). G. Deleuze, Cinéma 2. L'Image-Temps, Paris, Minuit, 1985. On the nineteenth century, D. Sternberger, Panorama oder Ansichten des 19. Jahrhunderts, 1934, Berlin, 1955. On the railroad, W. Schivelbusch, Geschichte der Eisenbahnreise, Frankfurt-am-Main, 1989. On Duchamp's 1911 nude, see the catalogue Duchamp, Philadelphia Museum of Art, 1984, no. 32.Google Scholar
Ready-Mades: Noteworthy among recent titles in a field too vast to exhaust are: Zaunschirm, Th., Bereites Mädchen. Ready-Made, Klagenfurt, 1983. Catalogue Duchamp, 1984. H. Molderings, Marcel Duchamp, Frankfurt-am-Main, 1987. On the “Richard Mutt Case,” see W. A. Camfield, Marcel Duchamp, Fountain, Houston, 1989. On Malevitch's painting, see the catalogue published by E. Weiss, Cologne, 1995; the catalogue of the exhibition Kazimir Malevitch, New York, 1991; the catalogue Mona Lisa, Duisburg, 1978, p. 196. On belonging to the suprematist movement, see C. Malevitch, Suprematismus. Die Gegenstandslose Welt, Cologne, 1989, p. 118. On Léger's painting, see J.-L. Ferrier, “Comment se débarrasser de la Joconde?” in Hommage à F. Léger, Paris, 1971, pp. 82 ff. On the crisis around 1930, see R. Golan, Modernity and Nostalgia, New Haven, 1995, pp. 53 ff. For Léger's text, see F. Léger, Fonctions de la peinture, Paris, 1965, pp. 53 ff. A. Huxley's text, The Gioconda Smile and Other Stories, London, 1984, pp. 103 ff; The Gioconda Smile: A Play, London, 1948; A. Gide, Les Faux-Monnayeurs [The Counterfeiters], see note 13 above.Google Scholar
Mona Lisa's Beard: On the 1919 Mona Lisa and its publication by Picabia, see Salzmann, S. and Reff, Th. in the catalogue Mona Lisa, Duisburg, 1978, pp. 57 ff., pp. 79 ff., pp. 198 ff. E. Bonk, Marcel Duchamp. Die grosse Schachtel, Munich, 1989, pp. 241 ff. On the debate over Castiglione and the empty wall, see R. de la Sizeranne, in La Revue des Deux Mondes, 1912. Concerning the pseudonym Rose Sélavy, used by Duchamp starting in 1920 (for Man Ray's photograph of the bottle of perfume on the front pages in New York: Bonk, Dada, 1989, p. 247), there are numerous statements and allusions by Duchamp; see also Bonk, 1989, on La-boîte-en-valise, p. 97. On the subsequent metamorphoses of the beard, the catalogue Mona Lisa, Duisburg, pp. 202 ff. Concerning the reception of Duchamp, see S. Gohr (ed.), exhibition catalogue, Marcel Duchamp and the Avantgarde seit 1950, Cologne, 1988.Google Scholar
Travels of a Cliché: On paraphrases of the Mona Lisa, see Storey, M. R., Mona Lisa, New York, 1980; the Duisberg catalogue. The Spiegel article appeared 7 October 1959. The review Bizarre, with texts by J. Margat and others, dates from May 1959, no. XI and XII. André Malraux, Les Voix du Silence, II: La création artistique, Paris, 1951, p. 462. The text by Ch. de Tolnay, “Remarques sur la Joconde,” in Revue des Arts, 1952, 2, pp. 18 ff. On the Mona Lisa's trip to the United States, see F. Zöllner, J. F. Kennedy and Leonardo's Mona Lisa: Art as the Continuation of Politics, in W. Kersten (ed.), Radical Art History, Zurich, 1997, pp. 467 ff. See also P. Salinger, Mit Kennedy, Düsseldorf, 1967 [With Kennedy, Garden City, New York, 1966]; J. Walker, Self-Portrait with Donors, Boston, 1969. On Warhol's 1963 works, see R. Crone, Andy Warhol, Stuttgart, 1970, p. 136; likewise, Das bildnerische Werk Andy Warhols, Berlin, 1976; exhibition catalogue Andy Warhol Retrospektive, Cologne, 1990. For Warhol's text, Andy Warhol, Ma philosophie de A à B, Paris, Flammarion, 1977 [The Philosophy of Andy Warhol: From A to B and Back Again, New York, 1975].Google Scholar