No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
From Postmodernism to Mutation: How the Twentieth Century Draws to a Close
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Extract
Dear readers, perhaps you have not realized it, but your lives so far have been spent in a period called ‘postmodern’.
The word is well-known to you. It has been around for many years. It almost always occurs unexpectedly, half way through an article, in the middle of a conversation, in the course of an argument on radio or television. Something, when all is said and done, is postmodern, someone is what he or she is because he or she is postmodern; a strange and inexplicable phenomenon can be explained as postmodern. This changeable, suggestive, authoritative term, which seems to allude to something precise and technical and which, at the same time, suggests the epoch-making, says all that is good and all that is bad of something. Postmodern is an accusation. Postmodern is praise. What is postmodern is degenerate, has got worse, is hardly serious, of low quality, a poor imitation, irresponsible, frivolous. Nevertheless, what is postmodern is also still more topical, even more modern, forward-looking, amusing and light, cultured without being boring, sophisticated without being elitist, complex without being obscure.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 1999
References
Notes
1. This text appeared in a slightly different version in Lo Straniero, winter 1997-8, 80-97.
2. G. Steiner (1996) ‘The Archives of Eden', in No Passion Spent: Essays, 1978-1996 (London and Boston, Faber and Faber), 280-1.
3. Steiner (1996), 282.
4. Jean-François Lyotard (1979), La condition postmoderne (Les Éditions de Minuit) [French trans. note]
5. David Harvey (1989), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Oxford, Basil Blackwell), 36. [Eng. trans. note]