Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:23:38.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schizoid Femininities and Interstitial Spaces: Childhood and Gender in Celine Sciamma's Tomboy and P.J. Hogan's Peter Pan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Robbie Duschinsky
Robbie Duschinsky*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, UK
*
Robbie Duschinsky, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge University, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK. Email: rd522@medschl.cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Childhood innocence has often been treated by scholars as an empty, idealised signifier. This article contests such accounts, arguing that innocence is best regarded as a powerfully unmarked training in heternormativity, alongside class and race norms. This claim will be demonstrated through attention to two recent films addressing childhood: Celine Sciamma's Tomboy and P.J. Hogan's Peter Pan. The films characterise young femininity as an ‘impossible space’, in which subjects face the contradictory, schizoid demands to simultaneously show both childhood innocence and heteronormative femininity – or else face the threat of a spoiled identity. The plot of each film traces how the protagonist attempts to manoeuvre in the face of and precisely using this contradiction. In dramatising such manoeuvring, the films reveal the surprising forms of subjectivity (e.g. the tomboy) that can be inhabited for a time in the interstices between age and gender norms, and which might have lasting value. Both films thus dramatise how an interstitial space can offer possibilities for negotiating the terms under which a subject is inserted into dominant, recognisable forms of subjectivity.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 62 , Issue 1: Gender, globalisation, and cinema , February 2015 , pp. 128 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrie, JM (2004) Peter and Wendy and Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens [1911]. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W (2003) Theses on the concept of history [1940] in Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, 4, ed. Eiland, H, Jennings, MW. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bettis, PJ, Adams, NG (2006) Short skirts and breast juts: Cheerleading, eroticism and schools, Sex Education, 6(2): 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R (2000) Teratologies. In: Buchanan, I, Colebrook, C (eds) Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 156–172.Google Scholar
Butler, J (1990) Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chambers, D, Tincknell, E, van Loon, J (2004) Peer regulation of teenage sexual identities, Gender and Education, 16(3): 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dargis, M (2011) A summer of freedoms in boyhood, New York Times, November 15.Google Scholar
Davies, C (2008) Becoming sissy. In: Davies, B (ed.) Judith Butler in Conversation: Analysing the Texts and Talk of Everyday Life. London: Routledge, pp. 117–133.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G, Guattari, F (1984) Anti-Oedipus [1971], trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Duschinsky, R (2013) Childhood innocence: Essence, education and performativity, Textual Practice, 27(5): 763–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M (1978) The History of Sexuality, 1 [1976], trans. Hurley, Robert, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1998) Nietzsche, history, genealogy [1971]. In: Aesthetics: Essential Works, ed. JD Faubion, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (2003) The Abnormal [1975], trans. Graham Burchell, New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Goffman, E (1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Griffin, C (2005) Impossible spaces? Femininity as an empty/depopulated category, paper presented at the ESRC New Femininities Seminar Series, University of East London.Google Scholar
Hey, V (2009) The girl in the mirror: The psychic economy of class in the discourse of girlhood studies, Girlhood Studies, 2(2): 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, AY (2010) Deleuze and the girl, Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5): 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavey, AB (2009) From peanut butter jars to the silver screen. In: Kavey, AB, Friedman, LD (eds) Second Star to the Right: Peter Pan in the Popular Imagination. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Kehily, MJ (2001) Understanding heterosexualities: Masculinities, embodiment and schooling, Men and Masculinities, 4(2): 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, J (1992) Child-Loving: The Erotic Child and Victorian Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Link, J (2004) From the ‘power of the norm’ to ‘flexible normalism’: Considerations after Foucault, Cultural Critique, 57: 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J (2003) Siblings: Sex and Violence. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Morgan, BL (1998) A three generational study of tomboy behavior, Sex Roles, 39(9): 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munns, D (2009) ‘Gay, innocent and heartless’: Peter Pan and the queering of popular culture. In: Kavey, AB, Friedman, LD (eds) Second Star to the Right: Peter Pan in the Popular Imagination. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 219–242.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F (2007) On the Genealogy of Morality [1887], trans. Carol Diethe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paechter, CF (2010) Tomboys and girly-girls: embodied femininities in primary schools, Discourse, 31(2): 221–235.Google Scholar
Reay, D (2001) ‘Spice girls’, ‘nice girls’, ‘girlies’ and ‘tomboys’: gender discourses, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom, Gender & Education, 13(2): 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renold, E (1997) ‘All they’ve got on their brains is football.’ Sport, masculinity and the gendered practices of playground relations, Sport, Education and Society, 2(1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renold, E (2001) ‘Square-girls’, Femininity and the negotiation of academic success in the primary school, British Educational Research Journal, 27(5): 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renold, E (2002) ‘Presumed innocence’: (hetero)sexual, homophobic and heterosexist harassment amongst children in the primary school, Childhood, 9(4): 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renold, E (2008) Queering masculinity: Re-theorising contemporary tomboyism in the schizoid space of innocent/heterosexualized young femininities, Girlhood Studies, 1(2): 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renold, E (2009) Tomboys and hegemonic masculinity: (dis)embodying hegemonic masculinity, queering gender identities and relations. In Martino, W, Kehler, M, Weaver-Hightower, MB (eds) The Problem with Boys’ Education. London: Routledge, pp. 224–241.Google Scholar
Renold, E, Allan, A (2006) Bright and beautiful: High achieving girls, ambivalent femininities, and the feminization of success in the primary school, Discourse, 27(4): 457–473.Google Scholar
Renold, E, Ringrose, J (2011) Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorizing teen girls’ sexual cultures in an era of ‘sexualization’, Journal of Sociology, 47(4): 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringrose, J, Renold, E (2012) Teen girls, working-class femininity and resistance: retheorising fantasy and desire in educational contexts of heterosexualised violence, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(4): 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringrose, J, Gill, R, Livingstone, S, Harvey, L (2012) A Qualitative Study of Children, Young People and “Sexting”. London: NSPCC.Google Scholar
Rose, J (1992) The Case of Peter Pan, Or the Impossibility of Children's Fiction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rysst, M (2010) ‘I am only 10 years old’: Femininities, clothing fashion codes and the intergenerational gap of interpretation of young girls’ clothes, Childhood, 17(1): 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciamma, C (2011) Interview with the Director, http://www.originalplumbing.com/index.php/the-basics/interviews/item/214-celine-sciammas-tomboy-an-interview-with-the-directorGoogle Scholar
Thorne, B (1993) Gender Play. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Volkom, M (2009) The effects of childhood tomboyism and family experiences on the self-esteem of college females, College Student Journal, 43(3): 736–743.Google Scholar
Wilson, E (2003) Cinema's Missing Children. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar