Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:21:00.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual and Community Influences on Adherence to Directives in the Event of a Plague Attack: Survey Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Ricardo J. Wray ,
Jenine K. Harris ,
Keri Jupka ,
Santosh Vijaykumar ,
Elizabeth W. Mitchell ,
William Pollard ,
Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez ,
Dori Reissman  and
Keri Lubell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: During a public health emergency, public health officials issue directives with actions people need to take to protect themselves. Past research has shown that adherence to these directives depends on individual beliefs and circumstances. This report presents new research about the effects of community factors on adherence.

Methods: A random digit-dial survey of 936 residents in the St Louis, Missouri, area was conducted in 2008 to assess barriers to and facilitators of adherence to directives issued in response to a hypothetical scenario involving the intentional release of the bacterium that causes plague. Community factors were assessed using characteristics of census tracts for individual respondents. Multilevel modeling was used to understand how individual and community factors contributed to the likelihood of adherence.

Results: The majority of participants indicated that they would adhere to 3 distinct directives. Community poverty and ethnic homogeneity as well as individual-level barriers were negatively associated with adherence to a 6-day quarantine. Having children younger than 18 years and being away from home when the directive was called were negatively associated with adherence to a 10-hour quarantine. Logistical concerns were negatively associated with visiting a point of dispensing for prophylactic antibiotics.

Conclusions: Our findings establish an empirical basis for the influence of community factors on adherence to public health directives. The influence of community and individual factors on adherence varies across directives. Consequently, communication strategies to disseminate directives and organizational strategies to support them must vary according to the nature of the directives.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2012;6:253–262)

Keywords

social determinantspublic health directive adherenceinfectious disease outbreakmultilevel modeling
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 2012 , pp. 253 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Stokols, D.Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992;47 (1):6–22.Google Scholar
2.Berkman, LKawachi, I.A historical framework for social epidemiology.In: Social Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000:3-12.Google Scholar
3.Diez-Roux, A.The examination of neighborhood effects on health: conceptual and methodological issues related to the presence of multiple levels of organizations.In: Kawachi I, Berkman L, eds. Neighborhoods and Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
4.Jefferds, MDLaserson, KFry, AM, et alCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Anthrax Adherence Team. Adherence to antimicrobial inhalational anthrax prophylaxis among postal workers, Washington, DC, 2001. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8 (10):1138–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gordillo, Vdel Amo, JSoriano, VGonzález-Lahoz, J.Sociodemographic and psychological variables influencing adherence to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 1999;13 (13):1763–1769.Google Scholar
6.Drabek, T.Understanding disaster warning responses. Soc Sci J. 1999;36:515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ruef, C.Immunization for hospital staff. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17 (4):335–339.Google Scholar
8.Moore, DGamage, BBryce, ECopes, RYassi, A;BC Interdisciplinary Respiratory Protection Study Group. Protecting health care workers from SARS and other respiratory pathogens: organizational and individual factors that affect adherence to infection control guidelines. Am J Infect Control. 2005;33 (2):88–96.Google Scholar
9.Del Valle, SHethcote, HHyman, JMCastillo-Chavez, C.Effects of behavioral changes in a smallpox attack model. Math Biosci. 2005;195 (2):228–251.Google Scholar
10.Murphy, DARotheram-Borus, MJJoshi, V.HIV-infected adolescent and adult perceptions of tuberculosis testing, knowledge and medication adherence in the USA. AIDS Care. 2000;12 (1):59–63.Google Scholar
11.Tobin, GAWhiteford, LM.Community resilience and volcano hazard: the eruption of Tungurahua and Evacuation of the Faldas in Ecuador. Disasters. 2002;26 (1):28–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Gostin, LO.Controlling the resurgent tuberculosis epidemic: a 50-state survey of TB statutes and proposals for reform. JAMA. 1993;269 (2):255–261.Google Scholar
13.Joseph, HAShrestha-Kuwahara, RLowry, D, et alFactors influencing health care workers' adherence to work site tuberculosis screening and treatment policies. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32 (8):456–461.Google Scholar
14.Adam, BDMaticka-Tyndale, ECohen, JJ.Adherence practices among people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2003;15 (2):263–274.Google Scholar
15.Weimann, W.Conceptualizing the effects of mass-mediated terrorism. Political Communication Persuasion. 1987;4:213–216.Google Scholar
16.Godin, GNaccache, HMorel, SEbacher, MF.Determinants of nurses' adherence to universal precautions for venipunctures. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28 (5):359–364.Google Scholar
17.Wray, RJBecker, SMHenderson, N, et alCommunicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the Pre-Event Message Development Project. Am J Public Health. 2008;98 (12):2214–2222.Google Scholar
18.Kawachi, IBerkman, L.Social cohesion, social capital, and health.In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000:174-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Macintyre, SEllaway, A.Local opportunity structures, social capital and social inequalities in health: what can central and local government do? Health Promot J Austr. 1999;9:165–170.Google Scholar
20.Wilkinson, RMarmot, M.Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts.2nd ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Europe; 2003.Google Scholar
21.Schulz, ANorthridge, ME.Social determinants of health: implications for environmental health promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31 (4):455–471.Google Scholar
22.Norris, FHStevens, SPPfefferbaum, BWyche, KFPfefferbaum, RL.Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41 (1-2):127–150.Google Scholar
23.Baezconde-Garbanati, LUnger, JPortugal, CDelgado, JLFalcon, AGaitan, M.Maximizing participation of Hispanic community-based/non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in emergency preparedness. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2005-2006;24 (4):289–317.Google Scholar
24.Zakour, M.Social capital and increased organizational capacity for evacuation in natural disasters. Soc Dev Issues. 2008;30:13–28.Google Scholar
25.Morris, LSSchulz, RM.Patient compliance—an overview. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1992;17 (5):283–295.Google Scholar
26.Kirschenbaum, A.Generic sources of disaster communities: a social network approach. Int J Sociol Soc Policy. 2004;24:94–129.Google Scholar
27.Andrulis, DPSiddiqui, NJGantner, JL.Preparing racially and ethnically diverse communities for public health emergencies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26 (5):1269–1279.Google Scholar
28.Ritchie, LGill, D.Social Capital Theory as an integrating theoretical framework in technological disaster research. Sociol Spectr. 2007;27:103–129.Google Scholar
29.John, F.Kennedy School of Government. Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey. Boston, MA: Saguaro Seminar: Civic Engagement in America; 2001.Google Scholar
30.Norton, B McLeroy, KBurdine, J, et alCommunity capacity: concept, theory, and methods.In: Diclemente R, Crosby R, Kegler M, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research: Strategies for Improving Public Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002:194-227.Google Scholar
31.Sampson, R.Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: a multilevel systemic model. Am Sociol Rev. 1988;53:766–779.Google Scholar
32.Wray, R.How Will Individuals and Community Factors Affect Adherence to Public Health Directives in the Event of Plague Attack? Results of Household and Key Informant Interviews.Atlanta, GA: Emergency Communication System, National Center for Health Marketing, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.Google Scholar
33.Wray, RJupka, K.What does the public want to know about plague? Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2 (3):208–215.Google Scholar
34.Blakely, TALochner, KKawachi, I.Metropolitan area income inequality and self-rated health—a multi-level study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54 (1):65–77.Google Scholar
35.Browning, COlinger-Wilbon, M.Neighborhood structure, social organization, and number of short-term sexual partnerships. J Marriage Fam. 2003;65:730–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Coughlin, SSKing, JRichards, TBEkwueme, DU.Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15 (11):2154–2159.Google Scholar
37.Speight, J.Community homogeneity and consensus leadership. Sociol Q. 1968;9:387–396.Google Scholar
38.Krieger, NChen, JTWaterman, PDSoobader, MJSubramanian, SVCarson, R.Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156 (5):471–482.Google Scholar
39.Cagney, KABrowning, CRWen, M.Racial disparities in self-rated health at older ages: what difference does the neighborhood make? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60 (4):S181–S190.Google Scholar
40.Sampson, RJRaudenbush, SWEarls, F.Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997;277 (5328):918–924.Google Scholar
41.Messer, LCLaraia, BAKaufman, JS, et alThe development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index. J Urban Health. 2006;83 (6):1041–1062.Google Scholar
42.O’Campo, PBurke, JGCulhane, J, et alNeighborhood deprivation and preterm birth among non-Hispanic black and white women in eight geographic areas in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167 (2):155–163.Google Scholar
43.Messer, LCKaufman, JSMendola, PLaraia, BA.Black-white preterm birth disparity: a marker of inequality. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18 (11):851–858.Google Scholar
44.Lang, IALlewellyn, DJLanga, KMWallace, RBMelzer, D.Neighbourhood deprivation and incident mobility disability in older adults. Age Ageing. 2008;37 (4):403–410.Google Scholar
45.IME. Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes [computer program].Version 0.999375-392010.http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
46.Luke, D.Multilevel Modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.Google Scholar
47.Berry, WDFeldman, SMultiple Regression in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1985.Google Scholar
48.Field, A.Discovering Statistics Using SPSS.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar
49.Gelman, A.Struggling with survey weighting and regression modeling. Stat Sci. 2007;22:153–164.Google Scholar
50.Osypuk, TLAcevedo-Garcia, D.Are racial disparities in preterm birth larger in hypersegregated areas? Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167 (11):1295–1304.Google Scholar
51.Gordon, C.Mapping Decline: St. Louis and the Fate of the American City.Philadelphia, PA: Penn Press; 2008.Google Scholar
52.Massey, DSDenton, NA.Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions. Demography. 1989;26 (3):373–391.Google Scholar
53.Rubin, GJPotts, HWMichie, S.The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14 (34):183–266.Google Scholar
54.Kreuter, MLezin, N.Social capital theory implications for community-based health promotion. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research Strategies for Improving Public HealthSan Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2002:228-254.Google Scholar
55.Covello, VT.Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication. J Health Commun. 2003;8 4(suppl 1)5–8, discussion 148-151.Google Scholar