Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T06:52:40.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-Flood Rapid Needs Assessment in Srinagar City, Jammu and Kashmir State, India, September, 2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2018

Rajesh Yadav*
Affiliation:
National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
Dundaiah Somashekar
Affiliation:
National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
Samir V. Sodha
Affiliation:
Division of Global Health Protection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, New Delhi, India Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Kayla F. Laserson
Affiliation:
Division of Global Health Protection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, New Delhi, India Division of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Srinivasa Venkatesh
Affiliation:
National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
Himanshu Chauhan
Affiliation:
National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Rajesh Yadav, National Centre for Disease Control, Room Number 102, Administrative Building, 22 Shamnath Marg, Delhi, 110057, India (e-mail: drrajeshvyadav@gmail.com).

Abstract

Objectives

Torrential rainfall and flooding from September 2-6, 2014 submerged >350 villages in Jammu and Kashmir state. We conducted rapid needs assessment in capital Srinagar from 27 September to 1 October to assess population health and safety needs.

Methods

Based on Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) methodology, we selected 7 households each from 30 census blocks using 2-stage cluster sampling. We collected information on demographics, needs, and illnesses using structured questionnaire.

Results

Of the 210 households surveyed, an estimated 57% (CI: 41%-73%) reported significant damage, 50% (CI: 36%-63%) were evacuated, and 16% (CI: 10%-22%) reported injuries. Households lacked electricity (22%; CI: 8.8%-36%), tap water (13%; CI: 5%-21%), working toilets (11%; CI: 4%-19%), and adequate food supply (14%; CI: 8%-20%). Moreover, 55% (CI: 45%-64%) of households reported cough, cold, fever, rashes, or diarrhea; 68% (CI: 59%-77%) experienced agitation, anxiety, depression, or nightmares since the flooding. Of the households with a member on medicines for non-communicable diseases, 40% did not have a week’s supply. Restoring basic essentials (30%; CI: 22%-37%) and repairing houses (30%; CI: 19%-40%) were the most urgent needs expressed.

Conclusions

Floods damaged >1/2 of households in Srinagar, disrupting basic essentials, and causing mental trauma. These findings helped authorities prioritize assistance with psychological symptoms and availability of prescription medicines. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:133–137)

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Milly, PC, Wetherald, RT, Dunne, KA, Delworth, TL. Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature. 2002;415:514-517.Google Scholar
2. Romshoo S. Retrospective and Prospective of 2014 Floods For Building Flood Resilient Kashmir. New Delhi, India: Centre for Dialogue and Reconciliation; 2015.Google Scholar
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) Toolkit, 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2012.Google Scholar
4. Over 2.26 lakh people rescued in flood-hit J&K. Firstpost. September 14, 2014. http://www.firstpost.com/india/2-26-lakh-people-rescued-flood-hit-jk-1713439.html. Accessed September 16, 2014.Google Scholar
5. Norris, FH, Speier, A, Henderson, AK, et al. Assessment of health-related needs after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in New Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, New Orleans Area, Louisiana, October 17 to 22, 2005. MMWR. 2006;55(2):38-41.Google Scholar
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta and Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Rapid health response, assessment, and surveillance after a tsunami in Thailand, 2004–2005. MMWR. 2005;54(3):61-64.Google Scholar
7. Rodriguez, SR, Tocco, JS, Mallonee, S, Smithee, L, Cathey, T, Bradley, K. Rapid needs assessment of Hurricane Katrina evacuees-Oklahoma, September 2005. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(6):390-395.Google Scholar
8. George, C, Kanakamma, LG, John, J, Sunny, G, Cohen, A, De Silva, MJ. Post-tsunami mental health: a cross-sectional survey of the predictors of common mental disorders in South India 9-11 months after the 2004 Tsunami. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2012;4(2):104-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5872.2012.00196.x Google Scholar
9. North, CS, Pfefferbaum, B. Mental health response to community disasters: a systematic review. JAMA. 2013;310(5):507-518. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.107799 Google Scholar
10. Coldiron, ME, Llosa, AE, Roederer, T, Casas, G, Moro, MR. Brief mental health interventions in conflict and emergency settings: an overview of four Médecins Sans Frontières – France programs. Confl Health. 2013;7(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-7-23 Google Scholar
11. Demaio, A, Jamieson, J, Horn, R, de Courten M, Tellier S. Non-communicable diseases in emergencies: a call to action. PLoS Curr. September 6, 2013. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.53e08b951d59ff913ab8b9bb51c4d0de.Google Scholar
12. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. http://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed December 24, 2017.Google Scholar