Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:27:08.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Big Data in Disaster Recovery: An Integrative Literature Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2021

Andrew J. Rosenblum*
Affiliation:
Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Christopher M. Wend
Affiliation:
The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
Zohaib Akhtar
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Lori Rosman
Affiliation:
Welch Medical Library, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Jeffrey D. Freeman
Affiliation:
Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Daniel J. Barnett
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Health & Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
*
Corresponding author: Andrew J. Rosenblum, Email: arosenblum@jhu.edu.

Abstract

Objective:

Disasters of all varieties have been steadily increasing in frequency. Simultaneously, “big data” has seen explosive growth as a tool in business and private industries while opportunities for robust implementation in disaster management remain nascent. To more explicitly ascertain the current status of big data as applied to disaster recovery, we conducted an integrative literature review.

Methods:

Eleven databases were searched using iteratively developed keywords to target big data in a disaster recovery context. All studies were dual-screened by title and abstract followed by dual full-text review to determine if they met inclusion criteria. Articles were included if they focused on big data in a disaster recovery setting and were published in the English-language peer-reviewed literature.

Results:

After removing duplicates, 25,417 articles were originally identified. Following dual title/abstract review and full-text review, 18 studies were included in the final analysis. Among those, 44% were United States-based and 39% focused on hurricane recovery. Qualitative themes emerged surrounding geographic information systems (GIS), social media, and mental health.

Conclusions:

Big data is an evolving tool for recovery from disasters. More research, particularly in real-time applied disaster recovery settings, is needed to further expand the knowledge base for future applications.

Type
Systematic Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. World disasters report 2020. Published 2020. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/world-disaster-report-2020 Google Scholar
Kovacs, G, Spens, KM. Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 2007;37(2):99-114. doi: 10.1108/09600030710734820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenough, G, McGeehin, M, Bernard, SM, et al. The potential impacts of climate variability and change on health impacts of extreme weather events in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(Suppl 2):191-198.Google ScholarPubMed
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. What is a disaster? Accessed March 1, 2021. https://www.ifrc.org/en/what-we-do/disaster-management/about-disasters/what-is-a-disaster/ Google Scholar
Thomas, V, López, R. Global increase in climate-related disasters. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, (466). https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/176899/ewp-466.pdf Google Scholar
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. 2021. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/. doi: 10.25921/stkw-7w73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. National response framework. 4th ed. October 28, 2019. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/NRF_FINALApproved_2011028.pdf Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, KM, Willis, DE, Spialek, ML, et al. Food insecurity in the post-hurricane Harvey setting: risks and resources in the midst of uncertainty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):8424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiva-Bianchi, M, Mena, C, Ormazábal, Y, et al. Changes in geographic clustering of post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic growth seven years after an earthquake in Cauquenes, Chile. Geospat Health. 2020;15(2).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, DJ, Rosenblum, AJ, Strauss-Riggs, K, et al. Readying for a post–COVID-19 world: the case for concurrent pandemic disaster response and recovery efforts in public health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020;26(4):310-313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. National Disaster Recovery Framework. 2nd ed. June 2016. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-06/national_disaster_recovery_framework_2nd.pdf Google Scholar
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Build back better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. 2017. https://www.unisdr.org/files/53213_bbb.pdf Google Scholar
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Recovery. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/recovery Google Scholar
Ferris, E, Petz, D, Stark, C. The year of recurring disasters: a review of natural disasters in 2012. Brookings Institution; March 2013. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Brookings_Review_Natural_Disasters_2012.pdf Google Scholar
Yu, M, Yang, C, Li, Y. Big data in natural disaster management: a review. Geosciences. 2018;8(5):165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elichai, A. How big data can help in disaster response. Scientific American. Published December 13, 2018. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/how-big-data-can-help-in-disaster-response/ Google Scholar
Wamba, SF, Akter, S, Edwards, A, et al. How ‘big data’ can make big impact: findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. Int J Prod Econ. 2015;165:234-246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. Big data what it is and why it matters. Web site. Accessed October 28, 2020. https://www.sas.com/en_us/insights/big-data/what-is-big-data.html.Google Scholar
Vollmer, MA, Glampson, B, Mellan, T, et al. A unified machine learning approach to time series forecasting applied to demand at emergency departments. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21(1):1-14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asadzadeh, A, Pakkhoo, S, Saeidabad, MM, et al. Information technology in emergency management of COVID-19 outbreak. Inform Med Unlocked. 2020:100475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoyama, K, Cui, Q, Hanashima, M, et al. Emergency flood detection using multiple information sources: integrated analysis of natural hazard monitoring and social media data. Sci Total Environ. 2020:144371.Google ScholarPubMed
Yeo, J, Knox, CC, Hu, Q. Disaster recovery communication in the digital era: social media and the 2016 southern Louisiana flood. [Epub ahead of print, 2020 December 12]. Risk Anal. 2020. doi:10.1111/risa.13652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, JD, Blacker, B, Hatt, G, et al. Use of big data and information and communications technology in disasters: an integrative review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019;13(2):353-367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flavelle, C. AI startups promise to help disaster relief and evacuation. Bloomberg Businessweek Web site. Updated 2020. Accessed October 28, 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-16/ai-startups-promise-to-help-disaster-relief-and-evacuation.Google Scholar
Schwab, K. Disaster relief is dangerously broken. Can AI fix it? Fast Company Web site. Updated 2018. Accessed October 28, 2020. https://www.fastcompany.com/90232955/disaster-relief-is-dangerously-broken-can-ai-fix-it Google Scholar
Torraco, RJ. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2005;4(3):356-367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandomi, A, Haider, M. Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. Int J Inf Manage. 2015;35(2):137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akter, S, Wamba, SF. Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research. Ann Oper Res. 2017;283(1-2):939-959. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2584-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydinoglu, AC, Bilgin, MS. Developing an open geographic data model and analysis tools for disaster management: landslide case. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2015;15(2):335-347. doi: 10.5194/nhess-15-335-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulianne, S, Minaker, J, Haney, TJ. Does compassion go viral? social media, caring, and the fort McMurray wildfire. Inf Commun Soc. 2018;21(5):697-711. doi: 10.1080/1369118x.2018.1428651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, HM, Turner-McGrievy, G, Friedman, DB, et al. Examining the role of twitter in response and recovery during and after historic flooding in South Carolina. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019;25(5):E6-E12. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000841 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzzelli, MM, Morgan, P, Muschek, AG, et al. Information and communication technology: connecting the public and first responders during disasters. J Emerg Manag. 2014;12(6):441-447. doi: 10.5055/jem.2014.0207 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, JW, Mitomo, H, Otsuka, T, et al. Cultivation effects of mass and social media on perceptions and behavioural intentions in post-disaster recovery – the case of the 2011 great East Japan earthquake. Telemat Inform. 2016;33(3):753-772. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, D, Blaschke, T, Kienberger, S, et al. Spatial connectivity as a recovery process indicator: the L’aquila earthquake. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2013;80(9):1782-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, A, Duval-Diop, D, Novak, J. Identifying spatial patterns of recovery and abandonment in the post-Katrina holy cross neighborhood of New Orleans. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci. 2010;37(1):45-56. doi: 10.1559/152304010790588043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, JR, Pais, J. When nature pushes back: environmental impact and the spatial redistribution of socially vulnerable populations. Soc Sci Q. 2010;91(5):1187-1202. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00727.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fordis, M, Alexander, JD, McKellar, J. Role of a database-driven web site in the immediate disaster response and recovery of an academic health center: the Katrina experience. Acad Med. 2007;82(8):769-772. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180cc2b5c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruebner, O, Lowe, SR, Sykora, M, et al. A novel surveillance approach for disaster mental health. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0181233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181233 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Q, Xiao, Y. Geographic situational awareness: mining tweets for disaster preparedness, emergency response, impact, and recovery. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 2015;4(3):1549-1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, R, Inoguchi, M, Tamura, K, et al. Comparison between the life recovery processes after the mid-Niigata earthquake and the Chuetsu-Oki earthquake – results of a random sampled social survey using the life recovery calendar and GIS-based spatiotemporal analysis. J Disaster Res. 2015;10(2):196-203. doi: 10.20965/jdr.2015.p0196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nejat, A, Moradi, S, Ghosh, S. Anchors of social network awareness index: a key to modeling postdisaster housing recovery. J Infrastruct Sys. 2019;25(2):4019004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragini, JR, Anand, PMR, Bhaskar, V. Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. Int J Inf Manag. 2018;42:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebek, K, Jacobson, L, Wang, J, et al. Assessing capacity and disease burden in a virtual network of New York City primary care providers following hurricane Sandy. J Urban Health. 2014;91(4):615-622. doi: 10.1007/s11524-014-9874-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibuya, Y, Tanaka, H. A statistical analysis between consumer behavior and a social network service: a case study of used-car demand following the great east Japan earthquake and tsunami of 2011. Rev Socio Netw Strat. 2018;12(2):205-236. doi: 10.1007/s12626-018-0025-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, X, Lin, Y. Sensing distress following a terrorist event. In: Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. Springer International Publishing; 2016:377-388. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39931-7_36 Google Scholar
Vigilante, K, Escaravage, S, McConnell, M. Big data and the intelligence community—lessons for health care. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1888-1890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, N, Rex, S, Barnett, D, et al. Digital strategies for food security in disasters: a scoping review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. Published online October 11, 2021. doi:10.1017/dmp.2021.281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotnick, L, Hiltz, SR. Barriers to use of social media by emergency managers. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2016;13(2):247-277. doi: 10.1515/JHSEM-2015-0068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. Digital workplaces: vision and reality. Bus Inf Rev. 2012;29(4):205-214. doi: 10.1177/0266382112470412 Google Scholar
Jackson, LE. Frequency and magnitude of events. In: Bobrowsky PT, ed. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Springer; 2013:359-363.Google Scholar
HHS Protect Public Data Hub. About HHS protect. Accessed March 2, 2021. https://protect-public.hhs.gov/pages/about Google Scholar
Simunaci, L. Technology, expertise help determine vaccine distribution. Defense News. November 12, 2020. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2410195/technology-expertise-help-determine-vaccine-distribution/ Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rosenblum et al. supplementary material

Rosenblum et al. supplementary material

Download Rosenblum et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.4 KB