Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:19:55.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Public Health Preparedness Capacity Measurement: Development of the Local Health Department Preparedness Capacities Assessment Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2013

Mary V. Davis ,
Glen P. Mays ,
James Bellamy ,
Christine A. Bevc  and
Cammie Marti
Mary V. Davis*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, North Carolina Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Glen P. Mays
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Public Health, Little Rock, Arkansas
James Bellamy
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Public Health, Little Rock, Arkansas
Christine A. Bevc
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, North Carolina Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Cammie Marti
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Public Health, Little Rock, Arkansas
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mary V. Davis, DrPH, MSPH, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, North Carolina Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Center, Campus Box 8165, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (e-mail Mary_Davis@unc.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To address limitations in measuring the preparedness capacities of health departments, we developed and tested the Local Health Department Preparedness Capacities Assessment Survey (PCAS).

Methods

Preexisting instruments and a modified 4-cycle Delphi panel process were used to select instrument items. Pilot test data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. Kappa statistics were calculated to examine rater agreement within items. The final instrument was fielded with 85 North Carolina health departments and a national matched comparison group of 248 health departments.

Results

Factor analysis identified 8 initial domains: communications, surveillance and investigation, plans and protocols, workforce and volunteers, legal infrastructure, incident command, exercises and events, and corrective action. Kappa statistics and z scores indicated substantial to moderate agreement among respondents in 7 domains. Cronbach α coefficients ranged from 0.605 for legal infrastructure to 0.929 for corrective action. Mean scores and standard deviations were also calculated for each domain and ranged from 0.41 to 0.72, indicating sufficient variation in the sample to detect changes over time.

Conclusion

The PCAS is a useful tool to determine how well health departments are performing on preparedness measures and identify opportunities for future preparedness improvements. Future survey implementation will incorporate recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2013;7:578–584)

Keywords

preparedness measurementinstrument development
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 7 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 578 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Scutchfield, FD, Knight, EA, Kelly, AV, Bhandari, MW, Vasilescu, IP. Local public health agency capacity and its relationship to public health system performance. J Public Health Manag Practice. 2004;10(3):204-215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Nelson, C, Lurie, N, Wasserman, J, Zakowski, S. Conceptualizing and defining public health emergency preparedness. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(suppl 1):S9-S11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Asch, SM, Stoto, M, Mendes, M, Valdez, R, etal. A review of instruments assessing public health preparedness. Public Health Rep. 2005;120(5):532-542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Levi, J, Vitner, S, Segal, LM. Ready Or Not?: Protecting the Public's Health from Diseases, Disasters, and Bioterrorism, 2009. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; December 9, 2009.Google Scholar
5. Handler, A, Issel, M, Turnock, B. A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(8):1235-1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Mays, GP, Halverson, PK. Conceptual and methodological issues in public health performance measurement: results from a computer-assisted expert panel process. J Public Health Manag Practice. 2000;6(5):59-65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Roper, WL, Mays, GP. Performance measurement in public health: conceptual and methodological issues in building the science base. J Public Health Manag Practice. 2000;6(5):66-77.Google Scholar
8. Schuh, RG, Tony Eichelberger, R, Stebbins, S, etal. Developing a measure of local agency adaptation to emergencies: a metric. Eval Program Plan. 2012;35(4):473-480.Google Scholar
9. Donabedian, A. Evaluating the quality of medical care, 1966. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729.Google Scholar
10. Costich, JF, Scutchfield, FD. Public health preparedness and response capacity inventory validity study. J Public Health Manag Practice. 2004;10(3):225-233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Lovelace, K, Bibeau, D, Gansneder, B, Hernandez, E, Cline, JS. All-hazards preparedness in an era of bioterrorism funding. J Public Health Manag Practice. 2007;13(5):465-468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Beaulieu, J, Scutchfield, FD. Assessment of validity of the national public health performance standards: the local public health performance assessment instrument. Public Health Rep. 2002;117:28-36.Google Scholar
13. Beaulieu, J, Scutchfield, FD, Kelly, A. Content and criterion validity evaluation of National Public Health Performance Standards measurement instruments. Public Health Rep. 2003;118(6):508-517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Mays, GP, Halverson, PK, Baker, EL, Stevens, R, Vann, JJ. Availability and perceived effectiveness of public health activities in the nation's most populous communities. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(6):1019-1026.Google Scholar
15. Bhandari, MW, Scutchfield, FD, Charnigo, R, Riddell, MC, Mays, GP. New data, same story? Revisiting studies on the relationship of local public health systems characteristics to public health performance. J Public Health Manag Practice. 2010;16(2):110-117.Google Scholar
16. Savoia, E, Testa, MA, Biddinger, PD, etal. Assessing Public Health Capabilities during emergency preparedness tabletop exercises: reliability and validity of a measurement tool. Public Health Rep. 2009;124:138-148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Dorn, BC, Savoia, E, Testa, MA, Stoto, MA, Marcus, LJ. Development of a survey instrument to measure connectivity to evaluate national public health preparedness and response performance. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(3):329-338.Google Scholar
18. Hall, JN, Moore, S, Shiell, A. Assessing the congruence between perceived connectivity and network centrality measures specific to pandemic influenza preparedness in Alberta. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:124.Google Scholar
19. Hall, JN, Moore, S, Shiell, A. The influence of organizational jurisdiction, organizational attributes, and training measures on perceptions of public health preparedness in Alberta. Int J Public Health. 2012;57:159-166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Keeney, S, Hasson, F, McKenna, HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38(2):195-200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Mays, GP, Wayne, JB, Davis, MV, etal. Variation in local public health response to the 2009 H1N1 outbreak: comparative analyses from North Carolina. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association 2009 Annual Meeting; November 7-11, 2009; Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
22. Mays, GP, McHugh, MC, Shim, K, etal. Institutional and economic determinants of public health system performance. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):523-531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Austin, PC, Grootendorst, P, Anderson, GM. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2006;26(4):734-753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. McShane, LM, Midthune, DN, Dorgan, JF, Freedman, LS, Carroll, RJ. Covariate measurement error adjustment for matched case-control studies. Biometrics. 2001;57(1):62-73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Viera, AJ, Garrett, JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360-363.Google Scholar
26. Harris, JK, Beatty, K, Barbero, C, etal. Methods in public health services and systems research: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5 suppl 1):S42-S57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Stoto, M. Measuring and assessing public health emergency preparedness. J Public Health Manag Prac. 2013;19(suppl 2):S16-S21.Google Scholar
28. Lurie, N, Wasserman, J, Stoto, M, etal. Local variation in public health preparedness: lessons from California. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(4):291-291.Google Scholar
29. Duncan, W, Ginter, PM, Rucks, AC, etal. Organizing emergency preparedness within United States public health departments. Public Health. 2007;121(4):241-250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Green, LW. Public health asks of systems science: to advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):406-409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Scutchfield, FD, Marks, JS, Perez, DJ, Mays, GP. Public health services and systems research. Am J Prevent Med. 2007;33(2):169-171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Brownson, RC, Boehmer, TK, Haire-Joshu, D, Dreisinger, ML. Patterns of childhood obesity prevention legislation in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007;4(3):1-11.Google Scholar
33. Brownson, RC, Ballew, P, Dieffenderfer, B, etal. Evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity, what contributes to dissemination by state health departments. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(1):66-78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Brownson, RC, Ballew, P, Brown, KL, etal. The effect of disseminating evidence-based interventions that promote physical activity to health departments. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1900-1907.Google Scholar
35. Nanney, MS, Haire-Joshu, D, Brownson, RC, Kostelc, J, Stephen, M, Elliott, M. Awareness and adoption of a nationally disseminated dietary curriculum. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(1):64-73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Davis, MV, Bevc, CA, Mays, GP. P-CAS: a preliminary metric and baseline for preparedness capacity and capabilities. Presentation at the Public Health Preparedness Summit; February 21-24, 2012; Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar