Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T05:30:41.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2017

Extract

In the outset of the Inquiry, it was observed, that the Greek language is a language of regular structure, forming its roots within itself. Following out this idea, I have, in different parts of the investigation, had recourse to the line of cognates and derivatives, as the surest aids for conducting us to the radical sense of a word, where the immediate root appeared to have fallen into difuse, or the signification had diverged considerably from the primitive idea. The grounds upon which I have thus proceeded, may require elucidation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1805

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* I Do not here enter at all into the dispute about the origin of the Greek language from the Hebrew, through the medium of the old Pelasgic. In saft, such a derivation does not affect the structure of the language as complete within itfelf; for this derivation, if real, was not partial, but total: it was not the engrasting of parts upon a language already formed, but a transplantation of the whole, in its native form; fo that not only the branches, but the roots, with all their natural ramifications, were carried to, and established in, a new and somewhat different foil. In reasoning, therefore, on the structure of the language, the Greek may justly be reckoned an original language, forming its roots within itself; and the other words from thefe roots, by a regular progression.