Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T15:17:14.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—The Atrioventricular Pathway for Conduction of the Impulse for Cardiac Contraction in the Dog

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Francis Davies
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, University of Sheffield.
E. T. B. Francis
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, University of Sheffield.
D. R. Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Sheffield.
E. A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Sheffield.

Synopsis

It is generally believed that in mammals the impulse for cardiac contraction is conveyed from the atria to the ventricles by the atrioventricular bundle and its branches. This belief is mainly based on the A-V. dissociation which is found to follow experimental injury of the bundle. Since the bundle contains nerves, as well as specialized muscular elements, these experiments do not conclusively prove which structures, nerves or muscle, actually conduct the impulse. In the dog it has been previously shown that the right limb of the bundle is not usually accompanied by nerves, and in the present work the attempt was made by means of very small incisions to cut the muscle (Purkinje) fibres of the limb without damaging nerves in the ventricular septum, the effect on the electrocardiogram being noted. In 5 out of 38 perfused hearts of dogs the experiment was successful, and resulted in a significant delay in the contraction of the right ventricle relative to that of the left. The experiments also revealed that very considerable damage can be inflicted on the nerves in the ventricular septum without altering the electrocardiogram, so long as the limb itself is not injured. The results are regarded as providing direct evidence that the cardiac impulse in the dog is transmitted to the right ventricle by the muscular elements of the right limb of the bundle, and it is submitted that there would seem to be no valid reason for supposing that conduction throughout the A-V. bundle and its limbs is other than myogenic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Birchell, H. B., Essex, H. E., and Pruitt, R. D., 1952. “Studies on the spread of excitation through the ventricular myocardium. II. The ventricular septum”, Circulation, 6, 161171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, A. E., and Trendelenburg, W., 1910. “Untersuchungen zur Physiologie des Übergangbündels am Säugetierherzen, nebst mikroskopischen Nachprüfungen”, Pflug. Arch. ges. Physiol., 131, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, F., and Francis, E. T. B., 1946. “The conducting system of the vertebrate heart”, Bid. Rev., 21, 173188.Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, F., and Francis, E. T. B., 1952. “The conduction of the impulse for cardiac contraction”, J. Anat. Lond., 86, 302309.Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, F., Francis, E. T. B., and King, T. S., 1952. “Neurological studies of the cardiac ventricles of mammals”, J. Anat. Lond., 86, 130143.Google ScholarPubMed
Eppinger, H., and Rothberger, C. J., 1910. “Ueber die Folgen der Durchschneidung der Tawaraschen Schenkel des Reizleitungssystems”, Z. f. klin. Med., 70, 120.Google Scholar
Field, E. J., 1951. “The nervous component of the atrioventricular bundle”, J. Anat. Lond., 85, 105112.Google ScholarPubMed
Glomset, D. J., and Birge, R. F., 1945. “A morphologic study of the cardiac conduction system. Part IV. The anatomy of the upper part of the ventricular septum in man”, Amer. Heart J., 29, 526538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glomset, D. J., and Birge, R. F., 1948. “A morphologic study of the cardiac conduction system. Part V. The pathogenesis of heart block and bundle branch block”, Arch. Path. Lab. Med., 45, 135170.Google Scholar
Glomset, D. J., and Glomset, A. T. A., 1940. “A morphologic study of the cardiac conduction system in ungulates, dog and man. Part II. The Purkinje system”, Amer. Heart J., 20, 677701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hering, H. E., 1909. “Ueber den Beginn der Papillarimiskeläction und seine Beziehung zum Atrioventrikular-bündel”, Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol., 126, 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
His, W. Jr, 1893. “Die Tätigkeit des embryonalen Herzens und seine Bedeutung für die Lehre der Herzbewegung beim Erwachsenen”, Arb. med. Klin. Lpz., 1449.Google Scholar
Lewis, T., 1916. “The spread of the excitatory process in the vertebrate heart. Part III. The dog's ventricle”, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 207, 247283.Google Scholar
Lewis, T., and Rothschild, M. A., 1915. “The excitatory process in the dog's heart. Part II. The ventricles”, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, 206, 181226.Google Scholar
Rothberger, C. J., and Winterberg, H., 1913. “Zur Diagnose der einseitigen Blockierung der Reizleitung in den Tawara'schen Schenkeln”, Zbl. Herz-u. Gefässkr., 5, 206208.Google Scholar
Samuel, E. P., 1953 a. ”Towards controllable silver staining”, Anat. Rec., 116, 511520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuel, E. P., 1953 b.Impregnation and development in silver staining”, J. Anat. Lond., 87, 268277.Google ScholarPubMed
Samuel, E. P., 1953 c. “The mechanism of silver staining”, J. Anat. Lond., 87, 278287.Google ScholarPubMed