Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:46:24.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X.—The Influence of the Ratio of Width to Thickness upon the Apparent Strength and Ductility of Flat Test-bars of Mild Steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering inLeith Technical College
G. H. Gulliver
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Engineering in theUniversity of Edinburgh

Extract

In a large class of engineering structures it is essential that the materials employed should be both strong and ductile, so that not only shall the structure be able to resist heavy loads, but that if by any chance it is overloaded it shall not collapse suddenly. In order to ascertain whether a metal is suitable for a particular structure, its strength and ductility are determined experimentally. The test most commonly in use consists in applying a gradually increasing pull to a bar of the metal until fracture takes place. The maximum load supported per unit of the original cross-sectional area of the bar is called the tensile strength or tenacity of the metal, and the elongation of an initial measured length, expressed as a proportion of that length, is called the extension, and is used as an index of the ductility of the metal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Publications of the Engineering Standards Committee, No. 18, Crosby Lockwood, London, June 1907.Google Scholar
(2) Barba, , Commission des Méthodes d'Essai des Matériaux de Construction, Rothschild, Paris, 1895, III., A, 5.Google Scholar
(3) Appleby, , Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 1894, cxviii., 395.Google Scholar
(4) Unwin, , Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 1903, clv., 170.Google Scholar
(5) Gulliver, , Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 1905, 141Google Scholar
Gulliver, , Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 1907, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar