No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
XV.—The Life-history and Ecology of the Salmon Gill-Maggot Salmincola salmonea (Copepod Crustacean)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2017
Extract
This study was begun in 1936 primarily as an attempt to work out the life-history of the Salmon gill-maggot Salmincola salmonea (L.), a common and widespread copepod parasite of the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). At that time the adult female stage only was known, although this had been reported in Scotland as early as 1766 on a kelt salmon and had been included by Linnæus among his Vermes. It was not, however, until 1939, after three years of field work, that a complete series of the stages in the life-history of the parasite had been collected and the story began to take shape. During this time not only were parasites collected, but a quantity of statistical and observational data was accumulated bearing both on the parasite. and its host. Much of this referred to conditions in the estuary, a part of the common background of the two animals which was soon recognised to be a critical region for both. Consequently special attention was given to parasitised fish from this region, and this led to a widening of the scope of the investigation to include a consideration of the habitats and interrelations of gill-maggot and fish, indicated by the term “ecology” in the title.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , 1915 , pp. 503 - 541
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1942
References
REFERENCES TO LITERATURE
Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A., and Bassindale, R., 1935. “Survey of the River Tees,” Dept. Sci. and Ind. Res., Water Pollution Res., Tech. Paper 5.Google Scholar
Calderwood, W. L., 1904. “The Bull Trout of the Tay and of Tweed,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxv, p. 27.Google Scholar
Crichton, M. I., 1935. “Scale Absorption in Salmon and Sea Trout,” Fisheries, Scotland, Salmon Fish., no. 4.Google Scholar
Fasten, N., 1912. “The Brook Trout Disease in Wisconsin Waters,” Rept. Wis. Fish Com., 1911–12.Google Scholar
Fasten, N., 1913. “The Behaviour of a Parasitic Copepod. Lernœopoda edwardsii Olsson,” Journ. Animal Behav., vol. iii, p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasten, N., 1914. “Fertilisation in the Parasitic Copepod. Lernœopoda edwardsii Olsson,” Biol. Bull., vol. xxvii, p. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasten, N., 1916. “The Eye of the Parasitic Copepod. Salmincola edwardsii Olsson,” Biol. Bull., vol. xxxi, p. 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasten, N., 1918. “Morphology and Attached Stages of First Copepodid Larva of Salmincola edwardsii (Olsson) Wilson,” Pubns. Pug. Sound. Biol. St., vol. ii, p. 153.Google Scholar
Fasten, N., 1921 a. “Studies on Parasitic Copepods of the Genus Salmincola,” Amer. Nat., vol. lv, p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasten, N., 1921 b. “Another Male Copepod of the Genus Salmincola from the Gills of the Chinook Salmon,” Biol. Bull., vol. xli, p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, C. W., 1910. “The Speed of Migration of Salmon,” Journ. Exper. Zool., vol. lx, p. 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R., 1933. “British Fresh-water Copepoda,” Ray. Soc., London, vol. iii, p. 344.Google Scholar
Jarvi, T. H., and Menzies, W. J. M., 1936. “The Interpretation of the Zones on Scales of Salmon, Sea Trout and Brown Trout,” Rapp. Cons. Explor. Mer., vol. xcvii.Google Scholar
Kurz, W., 1877. “Studien uber die Familie der Lernaeopodiden,” Zeits. wiss. Zool., vol. xxix, p. 380.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, P. R. C., 1934. “Salmon of the River Tay, 1930,” Fisheries, Scotland, Salmon Fish., no. 5.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, P. R. C., 1935. “Salmon of the River Tay, 1934,” Fisheries, Scotland, Salmon Fish., no. 5.Google Scholar
Malloch, P. D., 1910. Life History and Habits of the Salmon, Sea Trout, etc. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Menzies, W. J. M., 1937. “The Movements of Salmon marked in the Sea,” Fisheries, Scotland, Salmon Fish., no. 1.Google Scholar
Menzies, W. J. M., 1938. “Some Preliminary Observations on the Migrations of Salmon on the Coasts of Scotland,” Rapp. Cons. Explor. Mer., vol. cviii, p. 17.Google Scholar
Mioulicich, M., 1905. “Zur Kenntniss der Gattung Brachiella Cuv. und der Organisation der Lernaeopodiden,” Zool. Am., vol. xxviii, p. 599.Google Scholar
Pryce-Tannatt, T. E., 1936. Initialled review of Crichton, 1935, Journ. Cons. Perm. Explor. Mer., vol. xi, p. 381.Google Scholar
Rutter, C., 1902. “Natural History of the Quinnat Salmon,” Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., vol. xxii, p. 67.Google Scholar
Van, Someren V. D., 1937. “A Preliminary Investigation into the Causes of Scale Absorption in Salmon,” Fisheries, Scotland, Salmon Fish., no. 2.Google Scholar
Vejdovsky, F., 1877. “Untersuchungen uber die Anatomie und Metamorphose von Tracheliastes polycolpus Nordm.,” Zeits. wiss. Zool., vol. xxix, p. 15.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B., 1930. “Some Responses of Sockeye Salmon to Environmental Influence during Fresh-water Migration,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 10, vol. vi, p. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B., 1933. “The Physiology of the Cuticle and of Ecdysis in Rhodnius prolixus,” Q.J.M.S., vol. lxxvi, p. 270.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. B., 1910. “The Development of Achtheres amploplitis Kellicott,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. xxxix, p. 189.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. B., 1915. “North American Parasitic Copepods belonging to the Lernæopodidæ, with a Revision of the entire Family,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. xlvii, p. 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1932. “On the Nature and Permeability of Chitin, I,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cxi, p. 298.Google Scholar