Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:52:02.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXVII.—On the Fossil Osmundaceæ.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

R. Kidston  and
D. T. Gwynne-Vaughan
R. Kidston
Affiliation:
Foreign Mem. K. Mineral. Gesell, zu St Petersburg
D. T. Gwynne-Vaughan
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Botany atQueen Margaret College, Glasgow University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The two new species of Osmundites described in this paper are based upon two fossils from the Jurassic rocks near Gore, Otago district, New Zealand. The one was discovered by Mr Robert Dunlop, and the other by Mr Robert Gibb. Both specimens eventually came into the possession of Mr Dunlop, who generously handed them over to the authors for investigation, with full permission to have them cut for microscopical examination, and to whom we take this opportunity of expressing our indebtedness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , 1907 , pp. 759 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Penhallow, , “Osmundites Skidegatensis, n.sp.,” Trans. Roy. Soc. of Canada, ser. 2, vol. viii., sec. iv., p. 3, fig. 6, 1902.Google Scholar
2.Pettko, , “Tubicaulis von Ilia bei Schenmitz,” Naturwissenschaftliche Abhandlungen von W. Haidinger, Bd. iii. p. 163, 1850.Google Scholar
3.Unger, , “Ein fossiles Farnkraut aus der Ordnung Osmundaceen, etc.,” Denkschriften der k. Acad. der Wissensch. im Wein, Bd. vi. p. 137, 1854.Google Scholar
4.Carruthers, , “On the Structure of a Fern Stem from the Lower Eocene of Herne Bay, etc.,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. xxvi. p. 349, 1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Penhallow, , l.c., and also “Notes on Cretaceous and Tertiary Plants of Canada,” in the same volume, p. 31.Google Scholar
6.Seward, and Ford, , “The Anatomy of Todea, etc.,” Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., ser. 2, vol. vi. p. 254, 1902.Google Scholar
7.Zenetti, , “Leitungssystem im Stamm von Osmunda regalis und dessen Uebergang in den Blattsteil,” Bot. Zeit., vol. liii. p. 53, 1895.Google Scholar
8.Jeffrey, , “The Structure and Development of the Stem in the Pteridophyta and Gymnosperms,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., vol. cxcv. p. 127, 1902.Google Scholar
9.Faull, , “The Anatomy of the Osmundaceæ,” Botanical Gazette, vol. xxxii, p. 418, 1901.Google Scholar
10.Boodle, , “Further Observations on Schizæa,” Annals of Botany, vol. xvii., No. 67, p. 513, 1903.Google Scholar
11.Chandler, , “On the Arrangement of the Vascular Strands in the ‘Seedlings’ of certain Leptosporangiate Ferns,” Annals of Botany, vol. xix., No. 75, p 406, 1905.Google Scholar
12.De Bary, , Comparative Anatomy, p. 280, Eng. ed.Google Scholar
13.Lachmann, , Contributions à l'histoire naturelle de la ravine des fougères, p. 110, Lyons, 1889.Google Scholar
14.Renault, , “Note sur la famille des Botryoptéridées,” Bull. Soc. d'Hist. Nat. d'Autun, vol. iv. p. 362, Pl. X. figs. 11–12, 1891. Also Bassin houillier et Permien d'Autun et d'Epinac, fasc. iv., “Flore fossile, deuxième partie,” p. 46 (1896); Atlas, Plate XXX. figs. 9 and 10; Plate XXXI. figs. 1 and 1bis (1893).Google Scholar