Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T01:47:20.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lower Carboniferous pteridosperm cupules and the origin of angiosperms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Albert G. Long
Albert G. Long
Affiliation:
Hancock Museum, Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Four new petrified specimens of cupules assigned to Hydrasperma cf. tenuis Long are described from the Cementstone Group of Oxroad Bay, East Lothian. In one of these specimens four ovules are present. Three of the specimens are interpreted as representing a pair of cupules derived from a single megasporophyll showing dichotomy so that each cupule is termed a hemi-cupule and has two lobed halves which represent quarters of the entire megasporophyll. In the fourth specimen five cupules are present, each possessing two lobed halves not sub-divided into quarters. Hydrasperma is thus interpreted as showing two kinds of cupules designated mega-cupules and paired hemi-cupules. The theory is developed that angiosperm carpels have evolved from the two kinds of pteridosperm cupules.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 70 , Issue 1-3 , 1977 , pp. 13 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, H. N., 1974. 25 years of botany. Paleobotany 1947–1972. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gdn, 61, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, E. A. N., 1905. On some new species of Lagenostoma, a type of Pteridospermous seed from the Coal Measures. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B76, 245–259.Google Scholar
Beck, C. B. (Editor), 1976. Origin and early Evolution of Angiosperms. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Blanc-Louvel, C., 1966. Étude anatomique comparée des tiges et des pétioles d'une Pteridospermée du Carbonifère dugenre Lyginopteris Potonié. Mém. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. Paris, C18, 103 pp., 158 Pl.Google Scholar
Boeswinkel, F. D. and Bouman, F., 1967. Integument initiation in Juglans and Pterocarya. Acta Bot. Neerl., 16, 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, F. O., 1923. The Ferns, 1, p. 219. Cambridge: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brenchley, W. E., 1913. On branching specimens of Lyginodendron oldhamium Will. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.)., 41, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canright, J. E., 1960. The comparative morphology and relationships of the Magnoliaceae. III. Carpels. Am. J. Bot., 47, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. J. H., 1949. The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Ann. Bot., 13, 367–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. J. H., 1953–1954. The durian theory extended, Pts 1, II, III. Phytomorphology, 3, 465–476. 4, 152–165; 263–274.Google Scholar
Corner, E. J. H., 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons. 2 vols. Cambridge: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Eames, A. J., 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. New York: McGraw Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaussen, H., 1946. Les Gymnospermes, Actuelles et Fossiles. Trav. Lab. For Toulouse, 2, sect. 1.Google Scholar
Heel, W. A. Van, 1967. Anatomical and ontogenetic investigations on the morphology of the flowers and the fruit of Scyphostegia borneensis Stapf (Scyphostegiaceae). Blumea, 15, 107–125.Google Scholar
Heel, W. A. Van, 1970. Distally lobed integuments in some Angiosperm ovules. Blumea, 18, 67–70.Google Scholar
Heel, W. A. Van, 1971. The distally lobed inner integument of Hernandia peltata Meissn.in DC (Hernandiaceae). Blumea, 19, 147–148.Google Scholar
Hjelmquist, H., 1948. Studies on the floral morphology and phylogeny of the Amentiferae. Botaniska Not. (Supp.), 2, 177 pp.Google Scholar
Hughes, N. F., 1976. Palaeobiology of Angiosperm Origins. Cambridge: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1924. Fossil plants of the Carboniferous Rocks of Great Britain, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K., 2, 418 pp. and Pl. CVIII.Google Scholar
Krassilov, V. 1973. Mesozoic plants and the problem of angiosperm ancestry. Lethaia, 6, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, J. F., 1955. Étude sur les Juglandaceae. Mem. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. Paris, B6, 1–246.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1960. Stamnostoma huttonense gen. et sp. nov.—a Pteridosperm seed and cupule from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1961. Some Pteridosperm seeds from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Berwickshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 64, 401–419.Google Scholar
Long, A. G., 1965. On the cupule structure of Eurystoma angulare. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 66, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1966. Some Lower Carboniferous fructifications from Berwickshire together with a theoretical account of the evolution of ovules, cupules and carpels. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 66, 345–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1969. Eurystoma trigona sp. nov., a Pteridosperm ovule borne on a frond of Alcicornopteris Kidston. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 68, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1975. Further observations on some Lower Carboniferous seeds and cupules. Trans Roy. Soc. Edinb., 69, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. G., 1977. Some Lower Carboniferous Pteridosperm cupules bearing ovules and microsporangia. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 70, 1–11.Google Scholar
Louvel, C., 1960. Ramification d'une tige principale de Lyginopteris oldhamia Binney, Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr., 2, 666–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maheshwari, P., 1950. An Introduction to the Embryology of the Angiosperms. New York: McGraw Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matten, L. C., Lacey, W. S. and Edwards, D., 1975. Discovery of one of the oldest Gymnosperm floras containing cupulate seeds. Phytologia, 32, 299–303.Google Scholar
Oliver, F. W., 1909. On Physostoma elegans Will. Ann. Bot., 23, 73–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, F. W. and Scott, D. H., 1904. On the structure of the Palaeozoic seed Lagenostoma Lomaxi, with a statement of the evidence upon which it is referred to Lyginodendron. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B197, 193–247.Google Scholar
Pettitt, J. M. and Beck, C. B., 1968. Archaeosperma arnoldii—a cupulate seed from the Upper Devonian of North America. Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich., 22, 139–154.Google Scholar
Renault, B., 1885. Cours de botanique fossile, 4. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Rendle, A. B., 1952. The Classification of Flowering Plants, II. Dicotyledons. Cambridge: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rothwell, G. W., 1975. The Callistophytaceae (Pteridospermopsida): 1. Vegetative Structures. Palaeontographica, B151, 171–196.Google Scholar
Scott, D. H., 1923. Studies in Fossil Botany, 3rd Edn. II, 36–40. London: Black.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1917. Fossil Plants, 3. Cambridge: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sporne, K. R., 1971. The mysterious origin of flowering Plants. Oxford Biology Readers, 3.Google Scholar
Sporne, K. R., 1974. The Morphology of Angiosperms, p. 122. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L., 1974. Flowering Plants, Ch. 10, 198–245. London: Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T. N. and Stockey, R. A., 1976. Studies of Paleozoic seed ferns: anatomy and morphology of Microspermopteris aphyllum. Am. J. Bot., 63, 1302–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepfer, S. S., 1953. Floral anatomy and ontogeny in Aquilegia formosa var. truncata and Ranunculus repens. Univ. Calif. Publs. Bot, 25, 513–648.Google Scholar
Tucker, S. C. and Gifford, E. M., 1966. Carpel development in Drimys lanceolata. Am. J. Bot., 53, 671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl, N. W. and Moore, H. E., 1971. The palm Gynoecium. Am. J. Bot., 58, 945–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, J., 1949. A petrified example of Alcicornopteris (A. Hallei sp. nov.) from the Lower Carboniferous of Dunbarton-shire. Ann. Bot., 13, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warming, E., 1878. De l'Ovule. Annls Sci. Nat. (Bot.), 5, 177–266.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. and Scott, D. H., 1896. Further observations on the organisation of the fossil plants of the Coal-Measures. Pt. III. Lyginodendron and Heterangium. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B186, 703–779.Google Scholar