Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T12:19:03.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIV.—The Muscular and Reproductive Systems of Atomaria ruficornis (Marsham) (Coleoptera, Cryptophagidæ.)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2017

M. E. G. Evans
M. E. G. Evans*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This is a study of the functional morphology of the muscular and reproductive systems of the adult beetle, Atomaria ruficornis (Marsham) made by means of serial sections and dissections. An account is given of the skeleto-muscular system of the head, thorax and abdomen with reference to previous work in this sphere. Wherever possible, the muscles described have been homologized with those of other Coleoptera. In a small number of cases, it has been found necessary to use new names for muscles. The probable mode of action of the mouth-parts and foregut during feeding is described. An account is given of the reproductive organs and genitalia of both male and female beetles; the muscular system of the genitalia in both sexes is described fully, and the functioning of the genitalia is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 64 , Issue 14: 1960-1961 The Muscular and Reproductive Systems of “Atomaria Ruficornis” (Marsham) (Coleoptera, Cryptophagid Æ) , 1961 , pp. 297 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Part of a thesis accepted for the degree of Ph.D. by the University of London.

References

References to Literature

Agarwal, N. S., 1955. “Genitalia and Reproductive Organs of Oryzœphilus surinamensis (Linn.). (Cucujidæ, Col.)”, Indian J. Ent., 17, 373–375.Google Scholar
Bauer, A., 1910. “Die Muskulatur von Dytiscus marginalia L. Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie des Insektenkorpers”, Z. Wiss. Zool., 95, 593–646.Google Scholar
Berlese, A., 1909. Gli insetti. Vol. I. Milan.Google Scholar
Bordas, L., 1900. “Recherches sur les organes réproducteurs mâles des Coléoptères (Anatomie comparée, histologic, matière fécondante)”, Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool, 11, 283–448.Google Scholar
Boyle, W. W., 1956. “A Revision of the Erotylidse of America North of Mexico”, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 110, 61–172.Google Scholar
Boettiger, E. G., and Furshpan, E., 1952. “The Mechanics of Flight Movements in Diptera”, Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 102, 200–211.Google Scholar
Campau, E. J., 1940. “The Morphology of Chauliognalhus pennsylvanicus (De Geer) (Coleoptera: Cantharidæ)”, Microentomology, 5, 57–85.Google Scholar
Coombs, C. W., and Woodroffe, G. E., 1955. “A Revision of the British Species of Cryptophagus (Herbst.) (Coleoptera: Cryptophagidæ)”, Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. Land., 106, 237–282.Google Scholar
Crowson, E. A., 1938. “The Mctendostermte in Coleoptera: a Comparative Study”, Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond., 87, 397–416.Google Scholar
Crowson, E. A., 1955. The Natural Classification of the Families of Coleoptera. N. Lloyd & Co., London.Google Scholar
Das, G. M., 1937. “The Musculature of the Mouth Parts of Insect Larvæ”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 80, 39–80.Google Scholar
Davey, K. G., 1958. “The Migration of Spermatozoa in the Female of Rhodnius prolixus Stal”, J. Exp. Biol., 35, 694–701.Google Scholar
Demandt, C., 1912. “Der Geschlechtsapparat von Dytiscus marginalis L. Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie des Insektenkorpers”, Z. Wiss. Zool., 103, 171–299.Google Scholar
Dennell, R., 1942. “The Structure and Function of the Mouth Parts, Rostrum and Fore-gut of the Weevil Calandra granaria L.”, Phil. Trans. B, 231, 247–291.Google Scholar
Donges, J., 1954. “Der Kopf von Cionus scrophidariœ L. (Curculionidæ)”, Zool. Jahrb., Anat., 74, 1–76.Google Scholar
Dorsey, C. K., 1943. “The Musculature of the Labrum, Labium and Pharyngeal Eegion of Adult and Immature Coleoptera”, Smithson. Misc. Coll., 103, No. 7, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Dutt, N., 1958. “Observations on the Genital System and Alimentary Canal of a Lamiid Beetle, Nupserha bicolor ”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 99, 393–399.Google Scholar
Eidt, D. C., 1958. “Anatomy and Histology of the Full-grown Larva of Cienicera œripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridæ)”, Canad. J. Zool, 36, 317–361.Google Scholar
Escherich, K., 1894. “Anatomische Studien über das männliche Genital svstem der Coleopteren”, Z. Wiss. Zool, 57, 620–641.Google Scholar
Evans, M. E. G., 1960. Some Aspects of the Morphology and Ecology of Atomaria sp. (Coleoptera). Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Evans, M. E. G., 1961a. “The Life History of Atomaria ruficornis (Marsh.) (Col. Cryptophagidæ)”, Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent., 14. [In the press.]Google Scholar
Evans, M. E. G., 1961b. “The Alimentary Canal of Atomaria ruficornis (Marsham) (Col. Cryptophagidæ)”, Entomologist, 94. [In the press.]Google Scholar
Evans, M. E. G., 1962. “The Fronto-clypeal Eegion and the Stomodeum in Coleoptera”, Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond., A. [In the press.]Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F., 1935. “The Prothoracic Pleurites of Coleoptera”, Ent. News, 46, 63–68; 93-95.Google Scholar
Ferris, G. F., 1940. “The Myth of the Thoracic Sternites of Insects”, Microentomology, 5, 87–90.Google Scholar
Forbes, W. T. M., 1922. “The Wing Venation of Coleoptera”, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 15, 328–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, W. T. M., 1926. “The Wing Folding Patterns of the Coleoptera”, J. N. Y. Ent. Soc., 34, 42–68; 91-139.Google Scholar
Ford, N., 1923. “A Comparative Study of the Abdominal Musculature of Orthopteroid Insects”, Trans. Roy. Canad. Inst., 14, 207–319.Google Scholar
Fowler, W. W., 1887-1891. The Coleoptera of the British Islands, Vols. I-V. Lovell Eeeve & Co., London.Google Scholar
Hamnett, G. G., 1944. “An Investigation into the Life-history and Morphology of the Mustard Beetle, Phœdon cochleariœ F., on watercress”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 114, 368–381.Google Scholar
Harnisch, W., 1915. “Über den männlichen Begattungsapparat einiger Chrysomeliden. Ein Beitrag zur Philogenie des Copulationsapparates der Käfer”, Z. Wiss. Zool, 114, 1–94.Google Scholar
Herbst, H. G., 1952. “Studien über die Flügeldecke der Eutelinen und Cetoniinen (Col. Scarab.). Das Elytralgelenk”, Zool. Jahrb., Anat., 72, 1–66.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1939. “An Inquiry into the Natural Classification of the Dryopoidea, based partly on a Study of their Internal Anatomy (Col.)”, Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond., 89, 133–184.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1950. “A Trichopterous Larva with a Chelate Front Leg”, Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond., A, 25, 62–65.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E., 1955. “On the Structure, Function and Distribution of the Prolegs of the Panorpoidea, with a Criticism of the Berlese-Imms Theory”, Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond., 106, 455–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H. E., and Stephens, F. L., 1941. “Notes on the Biology and Immature Stages of Cryptophagus acutangulus Gyll. (Col., Cryptophagidœ)”, Bull. Ent. Res., 32, 135–143.Google Scholar
Hiznay, P. A., and Krause, J. B., 1955. “The Structure and Musculature of the Larval Head and Mouth-parts of the Horned Passalus Beetle, Popilius disjunctus Illiger”, J. Morph., 97, 55–76.Google Scholar
Holdhaus, K., 1903. “Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Koleopterengattung Atomaria Steph”, Munch. Koleopt. Z., 1, 350–382.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D., 1939. “On the Anteunal Musculature in Insects and other Arthropods”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 81, 273–320.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J., 1933. “Observations on the Flight Muscles of Sitona Weevils”, Ann. Appl. Biol., 20, 731–770.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J., 1952. “Observations on the Capacity for Flight of Water Beetles”, Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond., A, 27, 57–70.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J., 1956. “Observations on Flying and Flightless Water Beetles”, J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 43, 18–42.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R., and Paulian, R., 1944. “Morphologie abdominale des Coléoptères et systématique de l'ordre”, Rev. Franc. Ent., 11, 66–110.Google Scholar
Jeannel, R., and Paulian, R., 1949. “Coleoptera” in Traité de Zoologie, Tome IX (Ed. Grassé). Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Josting, E. A., 1942. “Die Innervierung des Skelettmuskel-systems des Mehlwurms (Tenebrio molitor L., Larve)”, Zool. Jahrb., Anat., 67, 381–460.Google Scholar
Korschelt, E., 1923-24. (Editor). Bearbeilung Einheimischer Tiere. Dytiscus marginalis L. 2 vols. W. Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kramer, S., 1955. “The Musculature of the Head of the Corydalis larva (Neuroptera, Sialidæ) ”, J. Morph., 96, 1–30.Google Scholar
Krautwig, M., 1930. “Untersuchungen am Kornkafer (Calandra granaria L.). Der Bau der Goschlechtsorgane mid ihre gegenseitigen Korrelationen”, Zool. Jahrb., Anat., 52, 539–596.Google Scholar
Larsen, O., 1954. “Die Flugorgane der Gyriniden (Col.)”, Opusc. Ent., 19, 5–17.Google Scholar
Lindroth, C. H., 1957. “The Principal Terms used for Male and Female Genitalia in Coleoptera”, Opusc. Ent., 22, 241–256.Google Scholar
Maki, T., 1938. “Studies on the Thoracic Musculature of Insects”, Mem. Fac. Sci. Agric. Taihoku, 24, 343 pp.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1958a. The Evolution of Arthropodan Locomotory Mechanisms. Part 6. Habits and Evolution of the Lysiopetaloidea (Diplopoda), some Principles of Leg Design in Diplopoda and Chilopoda, and Limb Structure of Diplopoda”, J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 43, 487–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1958b. “Hydrostatic Pressure and Leg Extension in Arthropods, with Special Reference to Arachnids”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1, 161–182, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Marsham, T., 1802. Entomologia Britannica. I. Coleoptera. London.Google Scholar
Menon, K. R., and Joshi, N. K., 1957. “On the Flight Muscles and Associated Skeletal Parts of Sternocerca chrysis var. chrysidoides (Buprestidee, Col.)”, J. Anim, Morph. Physiol., 4, 69–80.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. E., 1932. “The Structure and Development of the Reproductive System in Coleoptera, with Notes on its Homologies”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 75, 49–129.Google Scholar
Muir, F., 1918. “Notes on the Ontogeny and Morphology of the Male Genital Tube in Coleoptera”, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1918, 223–229.Google Scholar
Muir, F., 1919. “On the Mechanism of the Male Genital Tube in Coleoptera”, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond,, 1919, 404–414.Google Scholar
Mukerji, D., and Bhuya, A. H., 1937. “Reproductive System of the Bruchid Beetles Bruchus quadrimaculatus Fabr., and Bruchus (Callosobruchus) chinensis L. (Bruchidæ-Coleoptera)”, J. Morph., 61, 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, F. V., and Tiegs, O. W., 1935. “The Metamorphosis of Calandra oryzae ”, Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 77, 406–495.Google Scholar
Newton, H. C. F., 1932. “On Atomaria linearis Stephens (Coleoptera, Cryptophagidse) and its Larval Stages”, Ann. Appl. Biol., 19, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1948. Notes on Microscopical Technique for Zoologists. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Popham, E. J., 1960 “The Anatomy in Relation to Feeding Habits of Forficula auricularia L. and other Dermaptera”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 133, 251–300.Google Scholar
Pradhan, S., 1935. “The Genitalia and their Role in Copulation in Epilachna indica (Coccinellidae, Col.) with a Discussion of the Morphology of the Genitalia in that Family”, Proc. Acad. Sci. Unit. Prov., 5, 250–263.Google Scholar
Pradhan, S., 1938. “Neuro-muscular Study of the Mouth-parts of Coccinella septempunctata, with a Comparison of the Mouth-parts in Carnivorous and Herbivorous Coccinellids”, Rec. Indian Mus., 40, 341–358.Google Scholar
Pradhan, S., 1939. “Glands in the Head Capsule of Coccinellid Beetles, with a Discussion on some Aspects of Gnathal Glands”, J. Morph., 64, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, J. W. S., 1957. Insect Flight. (Cambridge Monographs in Experimental Biology, No. 9.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reitter, E., 1908-1916. Fauna Gennanica. Die Kafer des Deutschen Reiches. Vols. I–V. K. G. Lutz, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W., 1920. “The Structure, Bionomics and Economic Importance of Saperda carcharias Linn., ‘The Large Poplar Longhorn’”, Ann, Appl. Biol., 7, 299–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruschkamp, P. F., 1927. “Der Flugapparat der Käfer. Vorbedingung Ursache und Verlauf seiner Ruckbildung”, Zoologica, Stuttgart, 75, 88 pp.Google Scholar
Saxena, O. N., 1953. “Musculature of Mylabris pustulata Thunb. (Coleoptera)”, Agra Univ. J. Res. (Sci.), 2, 285–307.Google Scholar
Sharp, D., And Muir, F., 1912. “The Comparative Anatomy of the Male Genital Tube in Coleoptera”, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 1912, 477–642.Google Scholar
Sing-Pruthi, H., 1924a. “On the Post-embryonic Development and Homologies of the Male Genital Organs of Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera)”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1924, 857–868.Google Scholar
Sing-Pruthi, H., 1924b. “On the Development of the Ovipositor and the Efferent Genital Ducts of Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera), with Remarks on the Comparison of the Latter Organs in the Two Sexes”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1924, 869–883.Google Scholar
Sinha, R. N., 1953. “Sectioning Insects with Sclerotized Cuticle”, Stain Tech., 28, 249–253.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, O., 1947. “Die Ergebnisse einer Genitaluntersuchung der nordischen Arten der Gattung Atomaria Steph. (Col. Cryptophagidæ)”, Ent. Tidskr., 68, 91–119.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E., 1908. “A Comparative Study of the Thorax in Orthoptera, Euplexoptera and Coleoptera”, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash., 9, 95–108.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E., 1935. Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., London.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E., 1947. “The Insect Cranium and the ‘Epicranial Suture’”, Smithson. Misc. Coll., 107, No. 7, 52 pp.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E., 1957. “A Revised Interpretation of the External Reproductive Organs of Male Insects”, Smithson. Misc. Coll., 135, No. 6, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Srivastava, U. S., 1959. “The Maxillary Glands of Some Coleoptera”, Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. Lond., A, 34, 57–62.Google Scholar
Stellwaag, F., 1914. “Der Flugapparat der Lamellicornier”, Z. Wiss. Zool., 108, 359–429.Google Scholar
Stickney, F. S., 1923. “The Head Capsule of Coleoptera”, Illinois Biol. Monogr., 8, 104 pp.Google Scholar
Straus-Durckheim, H. E., 1828. Considerations generales sur l'anatomie comparée des animaux articulés, auxquelles on a joint l'anatomie descriptive du Hanneton vulgaré. Paris.Google Scholar
Tanner, V. M., 1927. “A Preliminary Study of the Genitalia of Female Coleoptera”, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., 53, 5–50.Google Scholar
Verhoeff, K. W., 1895. “Vergleichende-morphologie Untersuchungen über das Abdomen der Endomychiden, Erotyliden und Languriiden (im alter Sinne) und über die Muskulatur des Copulationsapparates von Triplax ”, Arch. Naturgesch., 61, 213–287.Google Scholar
Verma, K. K., 1958. “Torsion of the Male Genitalia of Galerucella birmanica Jac. (Coleoptera, Phytophaga, Chrysomelidæ)”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1, 793–794.Google Scholar
Weber, H., 1933. Lehrbuch der Entomologie. G. Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. W., 1930. “The Genitalia and Wing Venation of the Cucujidæ and Related Families”, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 23, 305–358.Google Scholar
Wollaston, T. V., 1857. “A Revision of the British Atomariee; with Observations on the Genus”, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., 4, 64–82.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R. Y., 1958a. “Structures and Functions of the Reproductive Systems of the Prairie Grain Wireworm, Ctenicera mripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridæ)”, Canad. J. Zool., 36, 725–751.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R. Y., 1958b. “Postembryonic Development of the Reproductive Systems of the Prairie Grain Wireworm, Ctenicera œripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridæ)” Canad. J. Zool., 37, 753–777.Google Scholar