Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T04:09:37.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXVIII.—The Stem-Endodermis in the Genus Piper*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

George Bond
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Botany, University of Glasgow.

Extract

The stem of the various species of Piper is characterised by its anomalous vascular structure. Medullary bundles are present throughout the genus, and there is, in addition, a modified type of secondary thickening. During an investigation of these features my attention was called by Professor Montagu Drummond to certain endodermal characters which appeared to be of considerable interest and which suggested that a more extended investigation was desirable.

Reference to the literature showed that the few earlier investigators of the genus had concerned themselves mainly with the peculiarities of the vascular system. J. E. Weiss (18) made some general observations on the occurrence of the endodermis in the genus, but no mention of the genus is made in the comprehensive monographs by Kroemer (8) and by Mylius (10) on the endodermis, or in the writings of Van Wisselingh. It would appear therefore that no detailed investigation of the endodermis in the genus has been carried out, in the past.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Barratt, Kate, “The Origin of the Endodermis in the Stem of Hippuris,” Ann. Bot., vol. xxx, pp. 9199, 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Bäsecke, P., “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der physiologischen Scheiden der Achsen und Wedel der Filicinen,” Bol. Zeil., vol. lxvi, 1908.Google Scholar
(3 Bond, G., “The Occurrence of Cell Division in the Endodermis,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. 1, pt. i, pp. 3850, 1930.Google Scholar
(4) Chamberlain, C. J., Methods in Plant Histology, University of Chicago Press, 1928.Google Scholar
(5) De Bary, , Comp. Anat. Phan. and Ferns. Transln., 1884.Google Scholar
(6) Haberlandt, , Physiological Plant Anatomy. Transln., 1914.Google Scholar
(7) Hosbach, O., “Beitäage zur Frage nach der Durchlässigkeit der Endodermiszellen,” Beiträge zur Biol. der Pjlanzn, Bd. xvi, Hft. 1, pp. 81127, 1928.Google Scholar
(8) Kroemer, K., “Wurzelhaut, Hypodernmis und Endodermis der Angiospermenwurzel,Bibl. Bot., Bd. xii, Hft. 59, 1903.Google Scholar
(9) Mager, H., “Beiträge zur Anatomie der physiologischen Scheiden der Pteridophyten,’ Bibl. Bot., Bd. xiv, Hft. 66, 1907.Google Scholar
(10) Mylius, G., “Das Polyderm,” Bibt. Bot., Bd. xviii, Hft. 79, 1913.Google Scholar
(11) Plaut, M., “Die physiologischen Scheiden der Gymnospermen, Equisetaccen, und Bryophyten.” Dissertation, Marburg, 1909.Google Scholar
(12) Priestley, J. H., “Light and Growth, II,” New Phyt., vol. xxv, pp. 145170, 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Priestley, J. H., and North, Edith E., “Physiological Studies in Plant Anatomy, III,” New Phyl., vol. xxi, pp. 113139, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14) Priestley, J. H., and Swingle, , “Vegetative Propagation from the Standpoint of Plant Anatomy,” U.S. Dept. Agric, Washington, Tech. Bull. 151, 1929.Google Scholar
(15) Priestley, J. H., and Woffenden, Lettice M., “Physiological Studies in Plant Anatomy, V,” New Phyl., vol. xxi, pp. 252268, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) Rimbach, A., “Ueber die Ursache dcr Zellhautwelling in der Endodermis der Wurzeln,” Ber. der D. Bot. Ges., Bd. xi, pp. 94113, 1893.Google Scholar
(17) Rumpf, G., “Rhizodermis, Hypodermis, und Endodermis der Farnwurzel,” Bibl. Bot., Bd. xiii, Hft. 62, pp. 145, 1904.Google Scholar
(18) Weiss, J. E., “Wachsthumsverhältnisse und Gefässbündelverlauf der Piperaceen,” Flora, 34 (N.R.), 1876.Google Scholar