Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:33:19.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXXIV.—On the Structure and Affinities of a Lepidodendroid Stem from the Calciferous Sandstone of Dalmeny, Scotland, possibly identical with Lepidophloios Harcourtii (Witham)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

A. C. Seward
Affiliation:
University Lecturer in Botany
A. W. Hill
Affiliation:
University Demonstrator in Botany, Cambridge

Extract

The unusually fine stem which forms the subject of this paper was found by Mr T. Kerr, of Edinburgh, in rocks of Calciferous sandstone age exposed in a railway cutting at Dalmeny, Linlithgowshire. Mr James Bennie, of the Geological Survey of Scotland, called the attention of Mr Kidston to the fossil, and the latter very generously placed part of the specimen in the hands of one of us for investigation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1900

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertrand, C. (91), “Remarques sur le Lepidodendron Harcourtii de Witham,” Travaux et Mémoires des Faculté de Lille, Mem. No. 6, Lille, 1891.Google Scholar
Binney, E. W. (62), “On some Plants showing Structure from the Lower Coal-Measures of Lancashire,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xviii. p. 106, 1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binney, E. W. (71), “Observations on the Structure of Fossil Plants found in the Carboniferous Strata. Pt. II. Lepidostrobus and some allied ConesPalœont. Soc., London, 1871.Google Scholar
Binney, E. W. (72), Palœont. Soc. Pt. III. Lepidodendron, 1872.Google Scholar
Bower, F. O. (93), “On the Structure of the Axis of Lepidostrobus Brownii, Schmp.,” Annals Bot., vol. vii. p. 329, 1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brongniart, A. (37), “Histoire des Végétaux Fossiles,” vol. ii., Paris, 1837.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A. (39), “Observations sur la structure intérieure du Sigillaria elegans,” Arch. Mus. d'hist. Nat., vol. i. p. 405, 1839.Google Scholar
Carruthers, W. (69), “On the Structure of the Stems of the Arborescent Lycopodiacese of the Coal-Measures,” Monthly Mier. Journ., p. 177, 1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, W. (69), “On the Plant Remains from the Brazilian Coal-Beds, with remarks on the Genus Flemingites,” Geol. Mag., vol. vi. p. 5, 1869.Google Scholar
Corda, A. J. (45), “Beiträge Zur. Flora der Vorwelt,” Prag., 1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flot, L. (93), “Recherches sur la zone périmédullaire de la tige,” Ann. Sci. Nat. [7], vol. xxviii. p. 37.Google Scholar
Grand'Eury, C.Vide Renault.Google Scholar
Haberlandt, G. (96), “Physiologische Pflanzenanatomie,” Leipzig, 1896.Google Scholar
Hill, A. W.Vide Seward.Google Scholar
Hovelacque, M. (92), “Recherches sur le Lepidodendron selaginoides, Sternb.,” Mem. Soc. Linn. Normandie, vol. xvii. p. 5, 1892.Google Scholar
Kidston, R. (86), “Catalogue of the Palæozoic Plants in the Department of Geology and Palæontology, British Museum,” London, 1886.Google Scholar
Kidston, R. (93), “On Lepidophloios, and on the British Species of the Genus,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxvii. Pt. III. p. 529, 1893.Google Scholar
Kidston, R. (97), “On the Fossil Flora of the Yorkshire Coalfield” (Second Paper), Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxix. Pt. I. p. 33, 1897.Google Scholar
Lindley, J., and Hutton, W. (33), “The Fossil Flora of Great Britain,” London, vol. ii., 1833-1835.Google Scholar
Lybll, C. (78), “Elements of Geology,” London, 1878 (edit. 3).Google Scholar
Markfeldt, O., “Ueber das Verhalten der Blattspurstränge immergrüner Pflanzen beim Dicken-wachstum des Stammes oder Zweiges,” Flora, 1885, p. 33.Google Scholar
Renault, B., and Grand'Eury, C. (75), “Étude du Sigillaria spinulosa,” Mém. prés. div. sav. Acad. Sci. France, vol. xxii. p. 1, 1878.Google Scholar
Renault, B. (79), “Structure comparée de quelques tiges de la Flore Carbonifère,” Nouv. Arch. Mus. Paris, vol. ii., 1879 [2], p. 213.Google Scholar
Renault, B. (82), “Cours de Botanique fossile,” vol. ii., Paris, 1882.Google Scholar
Renault, B. (96), “Bassin Houiller et Permien d'Autun et d'Epinac,” Paris, 1896 (text); atlas, 1893. Études gítes Min. France, fasc. iv.Google Scholar
Renault, B., and Roche, A. (97), “Sur une nouvelle diploxyléeBull. Soc. d'hist. nat. d'Autun., vol. xi., 1897.Google Scholar
Scott, D. H.Vide Williamson.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. (98), “Fossil Plants,” vol. i., Cambridge, 1898.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., and Hill, A. W. (99), “On Lepidodendron from the Calciferous Sandstone of Scotland,” Proc. Phil: Soc. Cambridge, vol. x. Pt. I. p. 38, 1899.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C. (99), “Notes on the Binney Collection of Coal-Measure Plants. Pt. I. Lepidophloios; Pt. II. Megaloxylon gen. nov.,” Proc. Phil. Soc. Cambridge, vol. x. p. 137, 1899.Google Scholar
Solms-Laubach, Graf Zu (84), “Die Coniferenformen des deutschen Kupferschiefers und Zechsteins,” Pal. Abhand., Dames und Kayser, Bd. ii., 1884.Google Scholar
Solms-Laubach, Graf Zu (91), “Fossil Botany,” Oxford, 1891.Google Scholar
Solms-Laubach, Graf Zu (92), “Ueber die in den Kalksteinen des Kulm von Glätzisch-Falkenberg in Schlesien erhaltenen structurbietenden Pflanzenreste,” Bot. Zeit., p. 49, 1892.Google Scholar
Strasburger, E. (91), “Ueber den Bau und die Verrichtungen der Leitungsbahnen in den Pflanzen,” Hist. Beitr., Heft, iii., Jena, 1891.Google Scholar
Tschirch, A. (89), “Angewandte Pflanzenanatomie,” Wien and Leipzig, 1889.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (72), “On the Organisation of the Fossil Plants of the Coal-Measures. Pt. III. Lycopodicese,” Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. clxii. p. 283, 1872.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (80), Trans. Roy. Soc., Pt. X., Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. clxxi. p. 493, 1880.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (81), Trans. Roy. Soc., Pt. XI., Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. clxxii. p. 283, 1881.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (83), Trans. Roy. Soc., Pt. XII., Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. clxxiv. p. 459, 1883.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (87), “A Monograph on the Morphology and Histology of Stigmaria ficoides,” Palæont. Soc., London, 1887.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (87), “Note on Lepidodendron Harcourtii and L. fuliginosum (Will.),” Proc. R. Soc., vol. xlii. p. 6, 1887.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (89), “On the Organisation,” etc., Pt. XVI., Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. clxxx. p. 195, 1889.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (93), Trans. Roy. Soc., Pt. XIX., Trans. Roy. Soc., clxxxiv. p. 1, 1893.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (93), “General, Morphological, and Histological Index to the Author's Collective Memoirs on the Fossil Plants of the Coal-Measures,” Lit. and Phil. Soc. Manchester, vol. vii. [4], p. 1, 1893.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (95), “On the Light thrown upon the Question of the Growth and Development of the Carboniferous Arborescent Lepidodendron by a Study of the Details of their Organisation,” Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. ix. [4], p. 31, 1895.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C. (96), “Reminiscences of a Yorkshire Naturalist.” (Edited by Mrs Williamson, Crawford.) London, 1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, W. C., and Scott, D. H. (94), “Further Observations on the Organisation of the Fossil Plants of the Coal-Measures. Pt. I.,” Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. clxxxv. p. 863, 1894.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., and Scott, D. H. (95), Trans. Roy. Soc., Pt. III., Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. clxxxvi. p. 703, 1895.Google Scholar
Witham, H. (32), “On Lepidodendron Harcourtii,” Trans. Nat. Hist Soc. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 1832.Google Scholar
Witham, H. (33), “The Internal Structure of Fossil Vegetables,” Edinburgh, 1833.Google Scholar
Worsdell, W. C. (96), “The Anatomy of the Stem of Macrozamia compared with that of other Genera of Cycadeæ,” Annals Bot., vol. x. p. 601, 1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witham, H. (98), “The Comparative Anatomy of certain Genera of the Cycadaceæ,” Journ. Linn. Soc., vol. xxxiii. p. 437, 1898.Google Scholar
Wünsch, E. A. (67), “Discovery of Erect Stems of Fossil Trees in Trappean Ash in Arran,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. ii. p. 97, 1867.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. (80), “Ueber das Transfusionsgewebe,” Flora, p. 2, 1880.Google Scholar