Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T00:35:01.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SUMS OF EXPONENTIALS OF RANDOM WALKS WITH DRIFT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2012

Abstract

For many time series in empirical macro and finance, it is assumed that the logarithm of the series is a unit root process. Since we may want to assume a stable growth rate for the macroeconomics time series, it seems natural to potentially model such a series as a unit root process with drift. This assumption implies that the level of such a time series is the exponential of a unit root process with drift and therefore, it is of substantial interest to investigate analytically the behavior of the exponential of a unit root process with drift. This paper shows that the sum of the exponential of a random walk with drift converges in distribution, after rescaling by the exponential of the maximum value of the random walk process. A similar result was established in earlier work for unit root processes without drift. The results derived here suggest the conjecture that also in the case when the Dickey-Fuller test or the KPSS statistic is applied to the exponential of a unit root process with drift, these tests will asymptotically indicate stationarity.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borodin, A.N. & Ibragimov, I.A. (1995) Limit theorems for functionals of random walks. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics 195(2).Google Scholar
Breitung, J. & Gourieroux, C. (1997) Rank tests for unit roots. Journal of Econometrics 81, 727.10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00031-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burridge, P. & Guerre, E. (1996) The limit distribution of level crossings of a random walk, and a simple unit root test. Econometric Theory 12, 705723.10.1017/S026646660000699XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corradi, V. (1995) Nonlinear transformation of integrated time series: A reconsideration? Journal of Time Series Analysis 16, 539549.10.1111/j.1467-9892.1995.tb00253.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P.L. & Krämer, W. (2003) The Dickey-Fuller test for exponential random walks. Econometric Theory 19, 865877.10.1017/S0266466603195072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, R. (2010) Exponentials of Unit Root Processes. Working paper, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ermini, L. & Granger, C.W.J. (1993) Some generalizations on the algebra of I(1) processes. Journal of Econometrics 58, 369384.10.1016/0304-4076(93)90050-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermini, L. & Hendry, D.F. (2008) Log income vs. linear income: An application of the encompassing principle. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70, 807827.10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00531.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1968) An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Application, vol. 2. Wiley.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. & Hallmann, J. (1991) Nonlinear transformations of the integrated time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 12, 207224.10.1111/j.1467-9892.1991.tb00078.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerre, E. & Jouneau, F. (1998) Geometric versus arithmetic random walk: The case of trended variables. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 68, 203220.10.1016/S0378-3758(97)00142-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J.Y. & Phillips, P.C.B. (1999) Asymptotics for nonlinear transformations of integrated time series. Econometric Theory 15, 269298.10.1017/S0266466699153015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, G.A. (1981) Growth of random walks conditioned to stay positive. Annals of Probability 9, 699704.10.1214/aop/1176994378CrossRefGoogle Scholar