Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T21:45:53.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots: A Bayesian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Harald Uhlig
Harald Uhlig
Affiliation:
Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper summarizes recent Bayesian research on unit roots for the applied macroeconomist in the way Campbell and Perron [8] summarized the classical unit roots perspective. The appropriate choice of a prior is discussed. In recognizing a consensus distaste for explosive roots, I find the popular Normal-Wishart priors centered at the unit root to be reasonable provided they are modified by concentrating the prior mass for the time trend coefficient toward zero as the largest root approaches unit from below. I discuss that the tails of the predictive density can be sensitive to the prior treatment of explosive roots. Because the focus of an investigation often is on a particular persistence property or medium-term forecasting property of the data, I conclude that Bayesian methods often deliver natural answers to macroeconomic questions.

Type
Articles
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 10 , Issue 3-4 , August 1994 , pp. 645 - 671
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Andrews, D.W.K.Exactly unbiased estimation of first order autoregressive/unit root models. Econometrica 61 (1993): 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Box, G.E.P. & Tiao, G.C.. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1973.Google Scholar
3.Berger, J.O.Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, 2nd ed.New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Berger, J.O. & Wolpert, R.L.. The Likelihood Principle. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Broemeling, L.D.Bayesian Analysis of Linear Models. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1985.Google Scholar
6.Broemeling, L.D. & Tsurumi, H.. Econometrics and Structural Change. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1987.Google Scholar
7.Campbell, J.Y. & Mankiw, N.G.. Are output fluctuations transitory? Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (1987): 857–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Campbell, J.Y. & Perron, P.. Pitfalls and opportunities: What macroeconomists should know about unit roots. In Blanchard, O. J. & Fisher, S. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
9.Canova, F.Vector Autoregressive Models: Specification, Estimation, Inference and Forecasting. Department of Economics, European University Institute, 1991.Google Scholar
10.Chow, G.C.Multiperiod predictions from stochastic difference equations by Bayesian methods. Econometrica 41 (1973): 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Christiano, L.J. & Eichenbaum, M.. Unit roots in GNP: Do we know, and do we care? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 32 (1990): 7–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Cochrane, J.H.How big is the random walk in GNP? Journal of Political Economy 96 (1988): 893–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Cochrane, J.H.A critique of the application of unit root tests. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15 (1991): 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Cochrane, J.H. Comment. In Blanchard, O.J. & Fisher, S. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
15.DeJong, D.N.Co-integration and trend-stationarity in macroeconomic time series: Evidence from the likelihood function. Journal of Econometrics 52 (1992): 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.DeJong, D.N. & Whiteman, C.H.. The temporal stability of dividends and stock prices: Evidence from the likelihood function. American Economic Review, 81 (1991): 600–617.Google Scholar
17.DeJong, D.N. & Whiteman, C.H.. The case for trend-stationarity is stronger than we thought. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 6 (1991): 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.DeJong, D.N. & Whiteman, C.H.. Reconsidering trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 28 (1991): 221–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.DeJong, D.N., Nankervis, J.C.Savin, N.E. & Whiteman, C.H.. Integration versus trend stationarity in time series. Econometrica 60 (1992): 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.DeJong, D.N. & Whiteman, C.H.. Modeling stock prices without pretending to know how to induce stationarity. Econometric Theory 10 (1994): 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.DeJong, D.N. & Whiteman, C.H.. The Forecasting Attributes of Trend-and Difference-Stationary Representations for Macroeconomic Time Series. University of Pittsburgh, 1993.Google Scholar
22.Doan, T., Litterman, R. & Sims, C.. Forecasting and conditional projection using realistic prior distributions. Econometric Reviews 3 (1984): 1–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Doan, T.RATS Manual. Evanston, IL: VAR Econometrics, 1990.Google Scholar
24.Durlauf, S.N.Output persistence, economic structure, and the choice of stabilization policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (1989): 69–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Elliot, G. & Stock, J.H.. Inference in Time Series Regressions When There Is Uncertainty about Whether a Regressor Contains a Unit Root. Harvard University, 1992.Google Scholar
26.Fair, R.C.Estimating Event Probabilities from Macroeconometric Models Using Stochastic Simulation. NBER technical working paper #111, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Geweke, J.Antithetic acceleration of Monte Carlo integration in Bayesian inference. Journal of Econometrics 38 (1988): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Geweke, J.Comment of Poirier: Operational Bayesian methods in econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (1988): 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Geweke, J.Bayesian inference in econometric models using Monte Carlo integration. Econometrica 57 (1989): 1317–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Geweke, J.Evaluating the Accuracy of Sampling-Based Approaches to the Calculation of Posterior Moments. Research Department Staff Report 148, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Geweke, J.Priors for macroeconomic time series and their application. Econometric Theory 10 (1994): 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Hendry, D.F. & Richard, J.-F.. On the formulation of empirical models in dynamic econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 20 (1982): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Hendry, D.F. Econometric methodology: A personal perspective. In Bewley, T. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, vol. 2, pp. 29–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Highfield, R.A. Forecasting with Bayesian State Space Models. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
35.Jeffreys, H.An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 186 (1946): 453–461.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Jeffreys, H.Theory of Probability, 3rd ed.London: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
37.Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C., Lütkepohl, H. & Lee, T.-C.. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
38.Kim, I.-M. & Maddala, G.S.. Flat priors vs. ignorance priors in the analysis of the AR(1) model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Kim, J.-Y.A Limited Information Bayesian Procedure: I. Theoretical Investigation. University of Minnesota, 1991.Google Scholar
40.Kim, J.-Y.Large Sample Properties of Posterior Densities in a Unit-Root Time Series Model. University of Minnesota, 1991.Google Scholar
41.Kleibergen, F. & van Dijk, H.K.. On the shape of the likelihood/posterior in cointegration models. Econometric Theory 10 (1994): 514–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Kloek, T. & van Dijk, H.K.. Bayesian estimates of equation system parameters: An application of integration by Monte Carlo. Econometrica 46 (1978): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Koop, G. & Steel, M.F.J.. A comment on “To criticize the critics: An objective Bayesian analysis of stochastic trends,” by P.C.B. Phillips. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Koop, G. & Steel, M.F.J.. A Decision Theoretic Analysis of the Unit Root Hypothesis Using Mixtures of Elliptical Models. Discussion paper 9150, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, 1991.Google Scholar
45.Koop, G.Objective Bayesian unit root tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7 (1992): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Koop, G.Aggregate shocks and macroeconomic fluctuations: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7 (1992): 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Koop, G., Osiewalski, J. & Steel, M.F.J.. Bayesian Long-Run Prediction in Time-Series Models. Boston University, 1992.Google Scholar
48.Koop, G., Osiewalski, J. & Steel, M.F.J.. Posterior Inference on Long-Run Impulse Responses. Working paper 92–29, División de Economí'a, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 1992.Google Scholar
49.Kwan, Y.-K.Bayesian Analysis with an Unknown Likelihood Function– A Limited Information Approach. University of Chicago, 1990.Google Scholar
50.Kydland, F.E. & Prescott, E.C.. The Econometrics of the General Equilibrium Approach to Business Cycles. Staff Report 130, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51.Learner, E.E.Specification Searches. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
52.Learner, E.E.Let's take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review 73 (1983): 31–43.Google Scholar
53.Learner, E.E.Sensitivity analysis would help. American Economic Review 75 (1983): 308–313.Google Scholar
54.Learner, E.E. Econometric metaphors. In Bewley, T. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, vol. 2, pp. 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
55.Learner, E.E.Comment on “To criticize the critics.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 371–374.Google Scholar
56.Litterman, R.Techniques of Forecasting Using Vector Autoregressions. Working paper 115, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57.Litterman, R.A Bayesian Procedure for Forecasting with Vector Autoregressions. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1980.Google Scholar
58.Litterman, R.Forecasting and policy analysis with Bayesian vector autoregression models. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review (1984): 30–41.Google Scholar
59.Litterman, R.Specifying Vector Autoregressions for Macroeconomic Forecasting. Staff Report 92, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Litterman, R.Forecasting with Bayesian vector autoregressions—Five years of experience. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 4 (1986): 25–38.Google Scholar
61.Lubrano, M.Testing for Unit Roots and Cointegration in a Bayesian Framework. CREQE, Marseille, 1991.Google Scholar
62.Lütkepohl, H.Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
63.McCulloch, R.E. & Tsay, R.S.. Bayesian inference of trend- and difference-stationarity. Econometric Theory 10 (1994): 596–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64.Muirhead, R.J.Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65.Naylor, J.C. & Smith, A.F.M.. Econometric illustrations of novel numerical integration strategies for Bayesian inference. Journal of Econometrics 38 (1988): 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66.Pagan, A.Three econometric methodologies: A critical appraisal. Journal of Econometric Surveys 1 (1987): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67.Pagan, A.Comment on Poirier: Dogma or doubt? Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (1988): 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68.Pagan, A.R. & Wickens, M.R.. A survey of some recent econometric methods. Economic Journal 99 (1989): 962–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69.Phillips, P.C.B.Reflections on econometric methodology. Economic Record 64 (1988): 544–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70.Phillips, P.C.B.To criticize the critics: An objective Bayesian analysis of stochastic trends. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 333–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71.Phillips, P.C.B.Bayesian routes and unit roots: De rebus prioribus semper est disputandum. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 3435–3474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72.Phillips, P.C.B. & Ploberger, W.. Time Series Modeling with a Bayesian Frame of Reference: I. Concepts and Illustrations. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, 1991.Google Scholar
73.Phillips, P.C.B. & Ploberger, W.. Posterior odds testing for a unit root with data-based model selection. Econometric Theory 10 (1994): 774–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74.Phillips, P.C.B.Bayes Models and Forecasts of Australian Macroeconomic Time Series. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, 1992.Google Scholar
75.Phillips, P.C.B.Bayesian Model Selection and Prediction with Empirical Applications. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, 1992.Google Scholar
76.Phillips, P.C.B.Bayes Methods for Trending Multiple Time Series with an Empirical Application to the U.S. Economy. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, 1992.Google Scholar
77.Poirier, D.J.Frequentist and subjectivist perspectives on the problems of model building in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (1988): 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78.Poirier, D.J.The subjectivist response. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (1988): 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79.Poirier, D.J.A comment on “To criticize the critics: An objective Bayesian analysis of stochastic trends.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80.Quah, D.The relative importance of permanent and transitory components: Identification and some theoretical bounds. Econometrica 60 (1992): 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81.Rust, J.Comment on Poirier: The subjective perspective of a “Spiritual Bayesian.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (1988): 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82.Sampson, M.The effect of parameter uncertainty on forecast variances and confidence intervals for unit root and trend stationary time-series models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83.Schotman, P.C. & van Dijk, H.K.. A Bayesian analysis of the unit root in real exchange rates. Journal of Econometrics 49 (1991): 195–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84.Schotman, P.C. & van Dijk, H.K.. Posterior Analysis of Possibly Integrated Time Series with an Application to Real GNP. Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, 1990.Google Scholar
85.Schotman, P.C. & van Dijk, H.K.. On Bayesian routes to unit roots. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86.Schotman, P.C.When Unit Roots Matter: Excess Volatility and Excess Smoothness of Long Term Interest Rates. Discussion paper 44, Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1991 (rev. 1992).Google Scholar
87.Schotman, P.C.Objective Information and Ignorance: Notes on Some Priors in the Bayesian Analysis of the AR(1) Model. University of Limburg, 1992.Google Scholar
88.Schotman, P.C.Jeffreys' Prior in Continuous Time. Princeton University, 1992.Google Scholar
89.Shannon, C.E.The mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
90.Sims, C.A.The role of approximate prior restrictions in distributed lag estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67 (1972): 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91.Sims, C.A.Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review (1986): 2–15.Google Scholar
92.Sims, C.A. Making economics credible. In Bewley, T. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, vol. 2, pp. 49–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
93.Sims, C.A.Identifying Policy Effects. Working paper 351, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
94.Sims, C.A.Bayesian skepticism on unit root econometrics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12 (1988): 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95.Sims, C.A.A Nine Variable Probabilistic Macroeconomic Forecasting Model. Discussion paper 14, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96.Sims, C.A.Modelling Trends. Discussion paper, Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1990.Google Scholar
97.Sims, C.A. & Uhlig, H.. Understanding unit rooters: A helicopter tour. Econometrica 59 (1991): 1591–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98.Sims, C.A.Comment by Christopher A. Sims on “To criticize the critics: An objective Bayesian analysis of stochastic trends,” by P.C.B. Phillips. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99.Stock, J.H.Bayesian approaches to the “unit root” problem: A comment. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6 (1991): 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
100.Thornber, H.Finite sample Monte Carlo studies: An autoregressive illustration. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62 (1967): 801–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101.Tsurumi, H. & Wago, H.. Bayesian Inference of Unit Root Under an Unknown Order of an ARM(p.q) Error Process and an Application to the Yen Foreign Exchange Rate. Rutgers University, 1992.Google Scholar
102.Uhlig, H.Bayesian Vectorautoregressions with Stochastic Volatility. Princeton University, 1991.Google Scholar
103.Uhlig, H.On Jeffreys prior when using the exact likelihood function. Econometric Theory 10 (1994): 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
104.Watson, M.W.Univariate detrending methods with stochastic trends. Journal of Monetary Economics 18 (1986): 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
105.West, M. & Harrison, J.. Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
106.Zellner, A.An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.Google Scholar
107.Zellner, A. Maximal data information prior distributions. In Aykac, A. & Brumat, C. (eds.), New Developments in the Applications of Bayesian Methods, pp. 211–232. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977.Google Scholar
108.Zellner, A.Bayesian analysis in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 37 (1988): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
109.Zellner, A., Hong, C. & Gulati, G.M.. Turning points in economic time series, loss structures and Bayesian forecasting. In Geisser, S., Hodges, J.S., Press, S.J. & Zellner, A. (eds.), Bayesian and Likelihood Methods in Statistics and Econometrics, pp. 371–393. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.Google Scholar
110.Zellner, A. Bayesian methods and entropy in economics and econometrics. In Grandy, W.T. Jr. & Schick, L.H. (eds.), Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, pp. 17–31. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
111.Zellner, A.Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Econometric Modeling: The Structural Econometric Modeling, Time Series Analysis (SEMTSA) Approach. University of Chicago, 1991.Google Scholar
112.Zellner, A. & Min, C.. Bayesian Analysis, Model Selection and Prediction. University of Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
113.Zivot, E. & Phillips, P.C.B.. A Bayesian Analysis of Trend Determination in Economic Time Series. Discussion paper 1002, Cowles Foundation, Yale University, 1991.Google Scholar
114.Zivot, E.A Bayesian analysis of the unit root hypothesis within an unobserved components model. Econometric Theory 10 (1994): 552–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar