Alger, Dan. 1984. “Equilibria in the Laboratory: Experiments with Oligopoly Markets where Goods are Made-to-Order.” Working paper no. 121, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission.Google Scholar

Berg, Joyce E., Daley, Lane A., Dickhaut, John W., and O'Brien, John R.. Forthcoming. “Controlling Preferences for Lotteries on Units of Experimental Exchange.” Quarterly Journal of Economics.Google Scholar

Bewley, Truman. Forthcoming. Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, Ken, Rubinstein, Ariel, and Wollinsky, Asher. 1985. “The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling.” Theoretical Economics Discussion Paper Series, London School of Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, Ken, Shaked, Avner, and Sutton, John. 1985. “Testing Noncooperative Bargaining Theory: A Preliminary Study.” American Economic Review 75:1178–80.Google Scholar

Binmore, Ken, Shaked, Avner, and Sutton, John. 1986. “An Outside Option Experiment.” Mimeo, London School of Economics.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Kalyan. 1985. “Disagreement in Bargaining: Models with Incomplete Information.” In Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, edited by Roth, A. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ferber, Robert, and Hirsch, Werner Z.. 1982. Social Experimentation and Economic Policy (Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fouraker, Lawrence E., and Siegel, Sidney. 1963. Bargaining Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Grether, David M., and Plott, Charles R.. 1984. “The Effects of Market Practices in Oligopolistic Markets: An Experimental Examination of the Ethyl Case.” Economic Inquiry 22:479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausmann, Jerry A., and Wise, David A. (editors). 1985. Social Experimentation. National Bureau of Economic Research: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, Charles A., Langan, Loren, and Villamil, Anne P.. 1984. “Market Power in Oral Double Auctions: Convergence to Competitive Equilibrium Prices Reconsidered.” Working paper.Google Scholar

Holt, Charles A., and Scheffman, David T.. 1985. “The Effects of Advance Notice and Best-Price Policies: Theory, with Applications to Ethyl.” Working paper (10).Google Scholar

Holt, Charles A., and Villamil, Anne P.. 1984. “The Effect of Market Power on the Direction of Convergence in Oral Double Auctions.” Working paper (12), University of Virginia, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Hong, James T., and Plott, Charles R.. 1982. “Rate Filing Policies for Inland Water Transportation: An Experimental Approach.” Bell Journal of Economics 13:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagel, John H. Forthcoming. “Economics According to the Rats (and Pigeons Too): What Have We Learned, and What Can We Hope to Learn.” In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, edited by Roth, Alvin E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kagel, John H., Battalio, Raymond C., and Green, Leonard. 1981. “Income-Leisure Tradeoffs of Animal Workers.” American Economic Review 71:621–32.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39:341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalai, Ehud, and Smorodinsky, Meir. 1975. “Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 43:513–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ketcham, J., Smith, V. L., and Williams, A.. 1984. “A Comparison of Posted-Offer and Double-Auction Pricing Institutions.” Review of Economic Studies 51:595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kihlstrom, R., Roth, A. E., and Schmeidler, D.. 1981. “Risk Aversion and Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problems.” In Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, edited by Moeschlin, O. and Pallaschke, D.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 65–71.Google Scholar

Knez, Mark, and Smith, Vernon L.. Forthcoming. “Hypothetical Evaluations and Preference Reversals in the Context of Asset Trading.” In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, edited by Roth, Alvin E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Machina, Mark J. 1983. “The Economic Theory of Individual Behavior Toward Risk: Theory, Evidence, and New Directions.” Technical Report #433, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Murnighan, J. Keith, Roth, Alvin E., and Schoumaker, Françoise. 1985. “Risk Aversion in Bargaining: An Experimental Study.” Working paper.Google Scholar

Nash, John. 1950. “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 28:155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perles, M. A., and Maschler, M.. 1981. “The Super-Additive Solution for the Nash Bargaining Game.” International Journal of Game Theory 10:163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, Charles R. 1982. “Industrial Organization Theory and Experimental Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 20:1485–1527.Google Scholar

Plott, Charles R. Forthcoming. “Dimensions of Parallelism: Some Policy Applications of Experimental Methods.” In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, edited by Roth, Alvin E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Plott, Charles R. 1985. “Laboratory Experiments in Economics: The Implications of Posted Price Institutions.” Mimeo, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Plott, Charles R., and Smith, Vernon L.. 1978. “An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions.” Review of Economic Studies 45:133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E. 1979. Axiomatic Models of Bargaining. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E. 1983. “Toward a Theory of Bargaining: An Experimental Study in Economics.” Science 220: 687–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E., (editor). 1985a. Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E. 1985b. “A Note on Risk Aversion in a Perfect Equilibrium Model of Bargaining.” Econometrica 53:207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E. Forthcoming. “Bargaining Phenomena and Bargaining Theory.” In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, edited by Roth, Alvin E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roth, Alvin E., (editor). Forthcoming. Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roth, Alvin E., and Malouf, Michael W. K.. 1979. “Game-Theoretic Models and the Role of Information in Bargaining.” Psychological Review 86:574–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E., Malouf, Michale W. K., and Murnighan, J. Keith. 1981. “Sociological Versus Strategic Factors in Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2:153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E., and Murnighan, J. Keith. 1982. “The Role of Information in Bargaining: An Experimental Study.” Econometrica 50:1123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E., and Rothblum, Uriel G.. 1982. “Risk Aversion and Nash's Solution for Bargaining Games with Risky Outcomes.” Econometrica 50:639–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Alvin E., and Schoumaker, Françoise. 1983. “Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental Study.” American Economic Review 73:362–72.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 50:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubinstein, Ariel. 1985. “Choice of Conjectures in a Bargaining Game with Incomplete Information.” In Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, edited by Roth, A. E., pp. 99–114. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubinstein, Ariel. Forthcoming. “A Sequential Theory of Bargaining.” In Advances in Economic Theory, edited by Bewley, Truman. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Selten, Reinhard. 1972. “Equal Share Analysis of Characteristic Function Experiments.” In Contributions to Experimental Economics III, edited by Sauermann, H.. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mahr, pp. 130–65.Google Scholar

Selten, Reinhard. 1982. “Equal Division Payoff Bounds for 3-Person Characteristic Function Experiments.” In Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making, edited by Tietz, R.. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 265–75.Google Scholar

Selten, Reinhard. Forthcoming. “Equity and Coalition Bargaining in Experimental 3-Person Games.” In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, edited by Roth, Alvin E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Selten, Reinhard, and Krischker, Wilhelm. 1982. “Comparison of Two Theories for Characteristic Function Experiments.” In Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making, edited by Tietz, R.. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 259–64.Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 1964. “Effect of Market Organization on Competitive Equilibrium.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 78:181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 1976. “Bidding and Auctioning Institutions: Experimental Results.” In Bidding and Auctioning for Procurement and Allocation, edited by Amihud, Y.. New York: New York University Press, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 1981. “An Empirical Study of Decentralized Institutions of Monopoly Restraint.” In Essays in Contemporary Fields of Economics, edited by Horwich, G. and Quirk, J., Lafayette, W.: Purdue University, 83–106.Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 1982a. “Markets as Economizers of Information: Experimental Examination of the ‘Hayek Hypothesis.’” Economic Inquiry 20:165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 1982b. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.” American Economic Review 72:923–55.Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon L., and Williams, Arlington W.. 1981. “The Boundaries of Competitive Price Theory: Convergence, Expectations and Transaction Cost.” Paper presented at the Public Choice Society Meetings, New Orleans, 03 13–15.Google Scholar

Thaler, Richard. Forthcoming. “The Psychology of Choice and the Assumptions of Economics.” In Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, edited by Roth, Alvin E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211:453–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, Robert B. Forthcoming. “Game Theoretic Analysis of Trading Processes.” In Advances in Economic Theory, edited by Bewley, Truman. Fifth World Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar