Article contents
Rejoinder
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0266267100001127/resource/name/firstPage-S0266267100001127a.jpg)
- Type
- Discussions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988
References
REFERENCES
Hammond, P. J. 1988. “Orderly Decision Theory: A Comment on Professor Seidenfeld.” Economics and Philosophy 4:292–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, E. F. 1988. “Ordering and Independence: A Comment on Professor Seidenfeld.” Economics and Philosophy 4:298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenfeld, T. 1985. Invited discussion of “Probability, Evidence, and Judgment,” by Dempster, A. P.. In Bayesian Statistics 2: Proceedings of the Second Valencia International Meeting, 1983, edited by J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley, and A. F. M. Smith, pp. 127–31. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Seidenfeld, T. 1988. “Decision Theory without ‘Independence’ or without ‘Ordering’: What Is the Difference?” Economics and Philosophy 4:267–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1977. “Social Choice Theory: A Re-examination.” Econometrica 45:53–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6
- Cited by