Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:22:21.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A dual quadratic transformation associated with the Hessian conics of a pencil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

T. Scott
Affiliation:
Dumfries Academy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The invariants and covariants of a system of two conics have been much studied2 but little has been said about those of three conies. Three conics have a symmetrical invariant Ω123, or in symbolical notation (a b c)2. According to Ciamberlini3 the vanishing of this invariant signifies that the Φ conic of any two of f1, f2, f3 is inpolar with respect to the third; and in a previous paper4 I have derived by symbolical methods a more symmetrical result, viz., if Ω123 vanishes, then u being any line in the plane, u1, u2, u3 are concurrent, where ui is the polar with respect to fi of the pole of u with respect to Φjk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1940

References

1 The integral is a case in point.

2 See Salmon Conic Sections, Ch. xviii, or Sommerville, Analytical Conies, Ch. xx. Taking point-coordinates x, y, z with corresponding line-coordinates l, m, n, a conic has a tangential equation . Then the vanishing of the invariant of the conics implies that there are triangles circumscribed to f 1 which are self-polar for f 2, and f 1 is said to be inpolar to f 2. The contravariant conic Φ12 is the envelope of a line whose intersections with f 1 harmonically separate its intersections with f 2.

3 Giorn. di Mat., Napoli, 32 (1886), 141.Google Scholar

4 Proc. Ed. Math. Soc, 2 iv (1935) 258.Google Scholar

1 Sommerville, loc. cit., p. 278Google Scholar; for a fuller discussion of mutual apolarity, see Strazzeri, , Rend. Circ. Mat. di Palermo, 32 (1937), 100.Google Scholar