Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T22:04:23.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A remark about canonical forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Hazel Perfect
Affiliation:
University College, Swansea.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A comparison of the rational and classical canonical forms of a square matrix reveals that for a nilpotent matrix the two are identical. In this note I describe how we may utilise this fact in solving the problem of reducing a given matrix to classical canonical form. I believe that the point which I try to make in what follows is one which is not always explicitly remarked upon in the literature, and it has therefore seemed to me to be worth while to stress it here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1956

References

REFERENCE

1Todd, J. A., Projective and Analytical Geometry (London, 1947), pp. 163–4.Google Scholar